4 research outputs found

    La chimie Ă  Lille (1823 - 1950)

    No full text
    LES DÉBUTS : KUHLMANN 1823-1854 On peut situer le début de l’enseignement supérieur de la chimie à Lille à l’année 1823, donc bien avant la création de la Faculté des Sciences (1854). En effet la municipalité lilloise, qui avait instauré, en 1817, sur ses propres ressources un cours de physique, décida l’ouverture d’un cours de « chimie appliquée aux arts industriels » et pour en assurer la qualité demanda à Vauquelin Professeur de Chimie au Muséum et à la Faculté de Médecine de Paris..

    Inclusion of ionization states of ligands in affinity calculations

    No full text
    When estimating binding affinities of a ligand, which can exists in multiple forms, for a target molecule, one must consider all possible competing equilibria. Here, a method is presented that estimates the contribution of the protonation equilibria of a ligand in solution to the measured or calculated binding affinity. The method yields a correction to binding constants that are based on the total concentration of inhibitor (the sum of all ionized forms of the inhibitor in solution) to account for the complexed form of the inhibitor only. The method is applied to the calculation of the difference in binding affinity of two inhibitors, 2-phosphoglycolate (PGA) and its phoshonate analog 3-phosphonopropionate (3PP), for the glycolytic enzyme triosephosphate isomerase. Both inhibitors have three titrating sites and exist in solution as a mixture of different forms. In this case the form that actually binds to the enzyme is present at relative low concentrations. The contributions of the alternative forms to the difference in binding energies is estimated by means of molecular dynamics simulations and corrections. The inhibitors undergo a pKa shift upon binding that is estimated by ab initio calculations. An interesting finding is that the affinity difference of the two inhibitors is not due to different interactions in the active site of the enzyme, but rather due to the difference in the solvation properties of the inhibitors. Protein 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc
    corecore