A Phenomenological Approach to Understanding the S.T.R.O.N.G. MENtoring Program: An African-American Male Retention Program at a Midsize Predominantly White Institution

Using phenomenological inquiry, the purpose of this present research was to explore the phenomena of the African-American undergraduate male experience in a retention program at a Midsize Midwestern predominantly White institution. Through data analysis the principle researcher examined the perceptions of the participants to understand the impact of the program. The participants accounted for their shared experiences as being a part of the S.T.R.O.N.G. MENtoring program during the 2011-2012 academic school year. Collectively the participants articulated a greater sense of awareness to their self-perception due their socialization at the site location. The participants also warranted feelings of confirmation biases, an increased obligation to the program, and the need for counter space. The principle researcher addresses the themes emerged from data analysis and provides implications for the future direction and guidance for the S.T.R.O.N.G. MENtoring program

Evaluation of thiobencarb runoff from rice farming practices in a California watershed using an integrated RiceWQ-AnnAGNPS system

The development of modeling technology to adequately simulate water and pesticide movement within the rice paddy environment faces several challenges. These include: (1) adequately representing ponded conditions; (2) the collection/implementation of temporal/spatial pesticide application data at field scales; (3) the integration of various mixed-landuses simulation schemes. Currently available models do not fully consider these challenges and results may not be sufficiently accurate to represent fate and transport of rice pesticides at watershed scales. Therefore, in this study, an integrated simulation system, "RiceWQ-AnnAGNPS", was developed to fully address these challenges and is illustrated in a California watershed with rice farming practices. The integrated system successfully extends field level simulations to watershed scales while considering the impact of mixed landuses on downstream loadings. Moreover, the system maintains the application information at fine spatial scales and handles varying treated paddy areas via the "split and adjust" approach. The new system was evaluated by investigating the fate and transport of thiobencarb residues in the Colusa Basin, California as a case study. Thiobencarb concentrations in both water and sediment phases were accurately captured by the calibrated RiceWQ model at the edge of field. After spatial upscaling, the integrated system successfully reflected both the seasonal pattern of surface runoff and the timing of monthly thiobencarb loadings. Incorporating future enhancements can further improve model performance by including more detailed water drainage schedules and management practices, improving the accuracy of summer runoff estimations, and incorporating a more sophisticated in-stream process module. This integrated system provides a framework for evaluating rice pesticide impacts as part of a basin level management approach to improve water quality, which can be extended to other rice agrochemicals, or other areas with fine-scale spatial information of pesticide applications

White House publicity operations during the Korean War, June 1950 – June 1951

Truman was the first modern president to face the challenge of selling a limited war. Based on a wide range of primary sources, this article explores the impact that the Korean War had on Truman’s publicity operations. Whereas all wars place important new demands on presidents to speak out more frequently and forcefully, limited wars place significant constraints on what presidents can say and do. During the Korean War, Truman refused to go public at key moments, often employed rhetoric that was more restrained than at earlier moments of the Cold War, and shied away from creating new structures to coordinate the official message. Such actions also had important consequences. In 1950-51, they hampered the task of effective presidential communication, and contributed to the war’s growing unpopularity. For the longer term, they demonstrated the difficulties of selling a limited war, and hence place into sharper context the problems that beset Truman’s successors during the subsequent conflict in Vietnam