Effectiveness and meaningful use of paediatric surgical safety checklists and their implementation strategies: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

Objective: To examine the effectiveness and meaningful use of paediatric surgical safety checklists (SSCs) and their implementation strategies through a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Summary background data Since the launch of the WHO SSC, checklists have been integrated into surgical systems worldwide. Information is sparse on how SSCs have been integrated into the paediatric surgical environment. Methods: A broad search strategy was created using Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently, in duplicate for inclusion. Extracted study characteristic and outcomes generated themes explored through subgroup analyses and idea webbing. Results: 1826 of 1921 studies were excluded after title and abstract review (kappa 0.77) and 47 after full-text review (kappa 0.86). 20 studies were of sufficient quality for narrative synthesis. Clinical outcomes were not affected by SSC introduction in studies without implementation strategies. A comprehensive SSC implementation strategy in developing countries demonstrated improved outcomes in high-risk surgeries. Narrative synthesis suggests that meaningful compliance is inconsistently measured and rarely achieved. Strategies involving feedback improved compliance. Stakeholder-developed implementation strategies, including team-based education, achieved greater acceptance. Three studies suggest that parental involvement in the SSC is valued by parents, nurses and physicians and may improve patient safety. Conclusions: A SSC implementation strategy focused on paediatric patients and their families can achieve high acceptability and good compliance. SSCs’ role in improving measures of paediatric surgical outcome is not well established, but they may be effective when used within a comprehensive implementation strategy especially for high-risk patients in low-resource settings

Post-operative management of esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula and gastroesophageal reflux: A Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons annual meeting survey

Background: Esophageal atresia (EA), with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), is commonly associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after surgical repair. One risk factor for anastomotic stricture is post-operative GER. This survey assessed practice patterns among attendees at the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (CAPS) annual meeting with respect to management of GER post EA-TEF repair. Methods: A pre-piloted survey was handed out and collected at the 2012 CAPS annual meeting. Data were entered and coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: We distributed 70 surveys, and 57 (81.4%) surveys were returned. On average, the incidence of EA-TEF is 8-10 cases per institution, per year. Anti-reflux medication is started immediately post-operatively in 74% of patients at institution of feeds (11%), or if symptoms of reflux develop (14%). Proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists are used in approximately equal proportion. Patients are typically kept on antireflux medication for 3-6 months (37%) or 6-12 months (35%). Conclusions: Most CAPS attendees treat postoperative GER prophylactically. However, there is no consistency in management strategy regarding which anti-reflux agent to use or for how long. A multi-centered study is required to establish a standardized protocol for the post-operative management of EA-TEF to prevent reflux and its effect on anastomotic strictures

Pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation and prophylactic oral antibiotics for pediatric patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial

Abstract Background Infections after elective colorectal surgery remain a significant burden for patients and the healthcare system. Adult studies suggest that the combination of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation is effective at reducing infections after colorectal surgery. In children, there is limited evidence for either of these practices and the utility of combining oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation remains uncertain. Methods This study aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of oral antibiotics, with or without mechanical bowel preparation, in reducing the rates of post-operative infection in pediatric colorectal surgery. Participants aged 3 months to 18 years undergoing elective colorectal surgery will be randomized pre-operatively to one of three trial arms: (1) oral antibiotics; (2) oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation; or (3) standard care. Twelve patients will be included in each trial arm. Feasibility outcomes of interest include the rate of participant recruitment, post-randomization exclusions, protocol deviations, adverse events, and missed follow-up appointments. Secondary outcomes include the rate of post-operative surgical site infections, length of hospital stay, time to full enteral feeds, reoperation, readmission, and complications. Discussion If the results of this trial prove feasible, a multi-center trial will be completed with sufficient power to evaluate the optimal pre-operative bowel preperation for pediatric patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03593252

BMJOpen_SuppTable1

Pediatric surgery checklist studies and their characteristics identified by systematic searc

A study of safety & effectiveness of evicel fibrin sealant as an adjunctive hemostat in pediatric surgery

Introduction: data on the use of fibrin sealants to control intraoperative bleeding in children are scarce. Evicel Fibrin Sealant (Ethicon Inc., Raritan, New Jersey, United States) was found safe and effective in clinical trials of adults undergoing various surgery types. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Evicel versus Surgicel Absorbable Hemostat (Ethicon Inc.) as adjunctive topical hemostats for mild/moderate raw-surface bleeding in pediatric surgery.Methods: a phase III randomized clinical trial was designed as required by the European Medicines Agency's Evicel Pediatric Investigation Plan: 40 pediatric subjects undergoing abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic surgery were randomized to Evicel or Surgicel, to treat intraoperative mild-to-moderate bleeding. Descriptive analyses included time-to-hemostasis and rates of treatment success (4, 7, 10 minutes), intraoperative treatment failure, rebleeding, and thromboembolic events.Results: forty of 130 screened subjects aged 0.9 to 17 years were randomized 1:1 to Evicel or Surgicel. Surgeries were predominantly open abdominal procedures. The median bleeding area was 4.0 cm2 for Evicel and 1.0 cm2 for Surgicel. The median time-to-hemostasis was 4.0 minutes for both groups. The 4-, 7-, and 10-minute treatment success rates were 80.0% versus 65.0%, 100.0% versus 80.0%, and 95.0% versus 90.0%, whereas treatment failure rates were 5.0% versus 25.0%, for Evicel and Surgicel, respectively. No deaths or thrombotic events occurred. Re-bleeding occurred in 5.0% of Evicel and 10.0% of Surgicel subjects.Conclusions: in accordance with adult clinical trials, this randomized study supports the safety and efficacy of Evicel for controlling mild-to-moderate surgical bleeding in a broad range of pediatric surgical procedures.<br/

BMJOpen_SuppTable2

Educational strategies used in published studies describing pediatric surgery checklist implementatio

BMJOpen_SuppTable3

Attitudes across pediatric surgical teams in regards to the surgical safety checklis