12 research outputs found

    Quantitative fluid overload in severe aortic stenosis refines cardiac damage and associates with worse outcomes

    Get PDF
    Aims: Cardiac decompensation in aortic stenosis (AS) involves extra-valvular cardiac damage and progressive fluid overload (FO). FO can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of FO beyond established damage markers to guide risk stratification. Methods and results: Consecutive patients with severe AS scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) underwent prospective risk assessment with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and echocardiography. FO by BIS was defined as ≄1.0 L (0.0 L = euvolaemia). The extent of cardiac damage was assessed by echocardiography according to an established staging classification. Right-sided cardiac damage (rCD) was defined as pulmonary vasculature/tricuspid/right ventricular damage. Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and/or death served as primary endpoint. In total, 880 patients (81 ± 7 years, 47% female) undergoing TAVI were included and 360 (41%) had FO. Clinical examination in patients with FO was unremarkable for congestion signs in >50%. A quarter had FO but no rCD (FO+/rCD−). FO+/rCD+ had the highest damage markers, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. After 2.4 ± 1.0 years of follow-up, 236 patients (27%) had reached the primary endpoint (29 HHF, 194 deaths, 13 both). Quantitatively, every 1.0 L increase in bioimpedance was associated with a 13% increase in event hazard (adjusted hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.22, p < 0.001). FO provided incremental prognostic value to traditional risk markers (NT-proBNP, EuroSCORE II, damage on echocardiography). Stratification according to FO and rCD yielded worse outcomes for FO+/rCD+ and FO+/rCD−, but not FO−/rCD+, compared to FO−/rCD−. Conclusion: Quantitative FO in patients with severe AS improves risk prediction of worse post-interventional outcomes compared to traditional risk assessment

    Natural history of functional tricuspid regurgitation : implications of quantitative doppler assessment

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES This study sought to define the relationship between functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and to establish the prognostic value of quantitative measures of TR severity (i.e., effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] and regurgitant volume). BACKGROUND The significance of TR in chronic heart failure is controversial. Earlier studies have shown an independent impact of TR on mortality, whereas more recent evidence suggests myocardial impairment to be the driving force of mortality rather than TR itself. Earlier studies have used qualitative measures of TR severity, hence the prognostic value of more quantitative measures of TR severity (i.e., EROA and regurgitant volumes) remains unclear. METHODS We enrolled 382 patients with HFrEF on guideline-directed medical therapy and assessed TR EROA and regurgitant volume by Doppler/2-dimensional echocardiography. All-cause mortality was defined as the primary study endpoint. RESULTS TR severity was associated with the HFrEF phenotype with more symptoms (p = 0.004), higher neurohumoral activation (p = 0.2 cm(2), and the regurgitant volume >= 20 ml with sustained excess mortality thereafter. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale outcome study demonstrates the prognostic value of quantitative Doppler-echocardiographic measures of TR severity in HFrEF. The thresholds for EROA and TR regurgitant volume associated with mortality in our study fall within current ranges defining nonsevere TR. This may potentially impact therapeutic decision making, particularly timing of intervention. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

    An Integrated Imaging and Circulating Biomarker Approach for Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

    No full text
    Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) is frequent among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), however it confers considerable diagnostic challenges. The assessment of neurohumoral activation may constitute a valuable supplement to the current imaging-based diagnostic process. This study sought to investigate the expression of complementary biomarkers in sTR and to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating their assessment into the diagnostic process. We enrolled 576 HFrEF patients recording echocardiographic and biochemical measurements, i.e., N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-pro-ET1), and copeptin. Plasma levels of the aforementioned neurohormones were significantly elevated with increasing sTR severity (p &lt; 0.001 for all). CT-pro-ET1 and MR-proANP were the closest related to severe sTR (adj. OR 1.46; 95%CI 1.11&ndash;1.91, p = 0.006 and adj. OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.13&ndash;1.87, p = 0.004, respectively). In patients with moderate-to-severe sTR, adding selected biomarkers (i.e., CT-pro-ET1 and MR-proANP) resulted in a substantial improvement in the discriminatory power regarding long-term mortality (C-statistic: 0.54 vs. 0.65, p &lt; 0.001; continuous NRI 57%, p &lt; 0.001). Circulating biomarkers closely relate to sTR severity and correlate with hemodynamic and morphologic mechanisms of sTR. Specifically, MR-proANP and CT-pro-ET1 are closely linked to the presence of severe sTR, and a combined assessment with the guideline recommended echocardiographic grading significantly improves individual risk stratification

    Principal morphomic and functional components of secondary mitral regurgitation

    No full text
    Objectives: The aim of this work was to identify the key morphological and functional features in secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) and their prognostic impact on outcome. Background: Secondary sMR in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction typically results from distortion of the underlying cardiac architecture. The morphological components which may account for the clinical impact of sMR have not been systematically assessed or correlated with clinical outcomes. Methods: Morphomic and functional network profiling were performed on a cohort of patients with stable heart failure optimized on guideline-based medical therapy. Principal component (PC) analysis and subsequent cluster analysis were used to condense the morphomic and functional data first into PCs with varimax rotation (PCVmax) and second into homogeneous clusters. Clusters and PCs were tested for their correlations with clinical outcomes. Results: Morphomic and functional data from 383 patients were profiled and subsequently condensed into PCs. PCVmax 1 describes high loadings of left atrial morphological information, and PCVmax 2 describes high loadings of left ventricular (LV) topology. Based on these components, 4 homogeneous clusters were derived. sMR was most prominent in clusters 3 and 4, with the morphological difference being left ventricular size (median end-diastolic volume 188 mL [interquartile range: 160 mL-224 mL] vs 315 mL [264 mL-408 mL]; P &lt; 0.001). Clusters were associated with mortality (P &lt; 0.001), but sMR remained independently associated with mortality after adjusting for the clusters (adjusted HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.14–1.77; P &lt; 0.01). The detrimental association of sMR with mortality was mainly driven by cluster 3 (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.32-3.60; P = 0.002), the “small LV cavity” phenotype. Conclusions: These results challenge the current perceptions that sMR in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction results exclusively from global or local LV remodeling and are suggestive of a potential role of the left atrial component. The association of sMR with mortality cannot be purely attributed to cardiac morphology alone, supporting other complementary key aspects of mitral valve closure consistent with the force balance theory. Unsupervised clustering supports the association of sMR with mortality predominantly driven by the small LV cavity phenotype, as previously suggested by a conceptional framework and termed disproportionate sMR
    corecore