Work and information : which workplace models still work in modern digital workplaces?

Introduction. In this paper, we outline some theoretical background for workplace studies in LIS to facilitate an understanding of what is new in the phenomena and how early frameworks may inform us about the modern digital workplaces. Method. We first characterise modern workplaces and discuss why new digital workplaces raise important questions for in relation to information-related activities in workplace. We explore significant, earlier frameworks on workplace information issues to question their utility in researching digital workplaces. Analysis. Our approach is to analytically examine the major trends and themes in early frameworks to present a discussion of which features may still be relevant to studying modern workplaces. Results. We see the continuance of this broad understanding of workplace information as a fruitful base for present and future studies of digital workplace information. This richness of views on workplace information leads to different understandings of information-related activities, which can create deep understandings but also conceptual confusion. Conclusion. Our workplaces have changed radically since the early frameworks; whilst some aspects may provide the underpinning for research in modern workplaces there is a need for further conceptual analyses and clarifications to facilitate future research and compile their findings

Snabbhet, bredhet eller djup : hur personlighet och studieinställning påverkar studerandes informationssökning

Summary: Fast, broad or deep - how personality and study approaches influence students' informatuion-seekin

Serendipity as chaos or discovery - exploring the role of personality and sense of coherence

Introduction. Individual differences have long been said to influence serendipity. Empirically, however, robust evidence is lacking for this connection. This study addressed this research gap by linking serendipity to personality traits and sense of coherence. Method. Data from 140 respondents was collected by an online survey. The survey measured the five-factor model personality traits, sense of coherence and serendipitously found useful and interesting information. Analysis. The data was analysed by a general linear model regression analysis. Results. Only 7% of variance of serendipity/usefulness and 10% of serendipity/interest could be explained by personality and sense of coherence. Usefulness was linked to sense of coherence (low comprehensibility), while interest was linked to personality (extraversion, agreeableness and low negative emotionality). Conclusions. Individual differences in serendipity was found both related to a negative cognitive experience of information chaos and a positive affective-behavioural experience of discovery. Lack of control over the information flow could lead to a sense that acquisition of useful information is governed by chance rather than conscious efforts. Activity, social connectedness and positive emotionality, in turn, would increase the likelihood to discover interesting information.publishedVersionPeer reviewe

Avoiding negative information as a strategy for emotion regulation

publishedVersionPeer reviewe

Students´ engagement in collaborative knowledge construction in group assignments for information literacy

Journal has a creative commons license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0