Weight gain and the risk of total hip replacement a population-based prospective cohort study of 265,725 individuals

SummaryObjectiveTo study the association between change in the body mass index (BMI) at different ages and the risk of a later total hip replacement (THR) due to primary osteoarthritis (OA).DesignA total of 265,725 individuals who had two repeated measurements of weight and height were included from national health screenings. These individuals were followed prospectively. The data were matched with the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and 4,442 of these individuals were identified as having received a THR for primary OA. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate sex-specific relative risks for having a THR according to age at screening and BMI change.ResultsMen and women aged 20 years or younger at the first screening in the quartile with the greatest BMI change per year had more than twice the risk of later having a THR compared with those in the quartile with the smallest BMI change per year. For men older than 30 years at the first screening, there was no relationship between BMI gain, or weight gain, and later risk of THR. For older women, BMI gain was associated with risk of THR, but to a lesser degree than in younger women.ConclusionThere was a clear relationship between change in BMI and the risk of later THR in young men and women, whereas the association was absent in older men and weaker in older women. It is important to focus on weight control to prevent future OA, and the preventive strategy should be focused on the young population

Total hip replacement. Results of a postal survey of current practice on the cement fixation of the acetabular cup in the UK

Previous finite element studies and laboratory investigations on reconstructed acetabulum joints show that long-term fixation of the acetabular cup in total hip replacements (THRs) is influenced by surgical fixation techniques. The aim of this study is to determine and understand the reasons of current practice in the cement fixation of the acetabular cup in THRs in the UK. Following a pilot study, a postal survey was carried out among 1350 orthopaedic consultants. Response rate was 40% and data obtained from the returned questionnaires provided information about the current practice of 431 consultants with an average of 16.5 years of experience and who perform an average of 55 cemented THR operations annually. The survey showed wide variations in the fixation methods of the acetabular component. 95% of the respondents use cement to fix the acetabular cup, 46% maintain the subchondral bone and 63 % use a flanged acetabular cup. The numbers of anchorage holes drilled vary from zero to thirty-six and drill diameters vary from 2 to 15 mm. Anchorage hole depths vary from 3 to 20 mm. Given the variability of surgical fixation methods, further studies need to be carried out to determine how fixation techniques could be improved to increase the longevity of the acetabular component in THRs. Further investigations could lead to a better understanding of the factors that contribute to the stability of THRs

A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years

PURPOSE: Acetabular deficiencies in young patients can be restored in several ways during total hip arthroplasty. Currently, cementless cups are most frequently used. Impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects is a more biological approach, but is it cost-effective in young patients on the long term? METHODS: We designed a decision model for a cost-utility analysis of a cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting versus an uncemented cup, in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for the young adult with acetabular bone deficiency, in need for a primary total hip arthroplasty. Outcome probabilities and effectiveness were derived from the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre and the Norwegian Hip Register. Multiple sensitivity analyses were used to assess the contribution of the included variables in the model's outcome. RESULTS: Cemented cups with impaction bone grafting were more cost-effective compared to the uncemented option in terms of costs per QALY. A scenario suggesting equal primary survival rates of both cemented and uncemented cups still showed an effect gain of the cemented cup with impaction bone grafting, but at higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this model, the first choice of treatment of the acetabular bone deficient osteoarthritic hip in a young patient is reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup

Substantial rise in the lifetime risk of primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis from 2003 to 2013: an international, population-level analysis

Abstract not availableI.N. Ackerman, M.A. Bohensky, R. de Steiger, C.A. Brand, A. Eskelinen, A.M. Fenstad, O. Furnes, G. Garellick, S.E. Graves, J. Haapakoski, L.I. Havelin, K.Mäkelä, F. Mehnert, A.B. Pedersen, O. Robertsso