Thymoglobulin Induction Dosing Strategies in a Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Population: Three or Four Days?

The optimal dose and duration of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction has not been defined. Methods. We compared the safety and efficacy of 2 dosing strategies, rATG 1.5 mg/kg for 4 days (n = 59) versus 2 mg/kg for 3 days (n = 59), in a retrospective, cohort study. Results. Two-year rejection-free survival was 95% in each group (P = .983). Renal function and infection rates were similar. The incidence of leucopenia was similar, although the 2 mg/kg group was more likely to be thrombocytopenic on day 2 (4% versus 28%, P = .04). Length of stay tended to be longer for the 1.5 mg/kg group (6.0 ± 3.7 versus 5.1 ± 1.9 days P = .104). A cost savings of $920 per patient for rATG were seen in the 2 mg/kg group (P = .122). Conclusions. Shorter, more intense dosing of rATG is safe and effective. The 3-day dose strategy resulted in a clinically shorter length of stay and may result in cost savings

Impact of hepatitis C virus status in pancreas transplantation: a case controlled study

Available data suggest that hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) renal transplant patients may be at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared with HCV- patients. Limited data are available regarding the impact of HCV status in pancreas transplant patients. We compared the outcomes of 10 HCV+ patients undergoing pancreas transplantation (seven simultaneous kidney-pancreas, one pancreas after kidney, two pancreas alone) between 1/96 and 10/99 with 20 HCV- recipients that were matched for age, race, gender, timing of transplant, type of pancreas transplant, and surgical technique. Length of follow-up was not significantly different between the HCV+ group compared with the HCV- group (24 +/- 14 vs. 20 +/- 13 months; p=0.45). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of all cause mortality in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 30 vs. 10%, respectively (p=0.17). Additionally, the HCV+ recipients had a trend toward a higher incidence of sepsis-related mortality compared with HCV- recipients, 20 vs. 5%, respectively (p=0.19). Renal allograft survival was 50% in the HCV+ group compared with 94% in the HCV- group (p=0.02). Pancreas allograft survival was not significantly different between the groups, 60 vs. 80%, respectively (p=0.24). At 3, 6, 12 months, and end of follow-up, there were no differences in serum creatinine, amylase, C-peptide, or fasting glucose levels. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of proteinuria at last follow-up in the HCV+ recipients with a renal allograft when compared with HCV- recipients, 50 vs. 12.5%, respectively (p=0.05). In order to maintain comparable glycemic control between the groups, there was a significant increase in oral hypoglycemic requirement in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 33 vs. 0%, respectively (p=0.01). These data suggest that HCV+ pancreas transplant patients may be at an increased risk of graft dysfunction and morbidity. Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to fully define the impact of HCV status on pancreas graft survival and function