Alcohol consumption and body composition in a population-based sample of elderly Australian men

Background: Alcohol is calorie dense, and impacts&nbsp;activity, appetite and lipid processing. The aim of this&nbsp;study was to therefore investigate the association between&nbsp;alcohol consumption and components of body composition&nbsp;including bone, fat and lean tissue.Methods: Participants were recruited from a randomly&nbsp;selected, population-based sample of 534 men aged&nbsp;65 years and older enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis&nbsp;Study. Alcohol intake was ascertained using a food&nbsp;frequency questionnaire and the sample categorised as nondrinkers or alcohol users who consumed B2, 3&ndash;4 or C5&nbsp;standard drinks on a usual drinking day. Bone mineral&nbsp;density (BMD), lean body mass and body fat mass were&nbsp;measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; overall&nbsp;adiposity (%body fat), central adiposity (%truncal fat) and&nbsp;body mass index (BMI) were calculated. Bone quality was&nbsp;determined by quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS).Results: There were 90 current non-drinkers (16.9 %),&nbsp;266 (49.8 %) consumed 1&ndash;2 drinks/day, 104 (19.5 %) 3&ndash;4&nbsp;drinks/day and 74 (13.8 %) C5 drinks/day. Those consuming C5 drinks/day had greater BMI (?4.8 %), fat mass&nbsp;index (?20.1 %), waist circumference (?5.0 %), %body&nbsp;fat (?15.2 %) and proportion of trunk fat (?5.3 %) and&nbsp;lower lean mass (-5.0 %) than non-drinkers after adjustment for demographic and lifestyle factors. Furthermore,&nbsp;they were more likely to be obese than non-drinkers&nbsp;according to criteria based on BMI (OR = 2.83, 95 %CI&nbsp;1.10&ndash;7.29) or waist circumference (OR = 3.36, 95 %CI&nbsp;1.32&ndash;8.54). There was an inverse relationship between&nbsp;alcohol consumption and QUS parameters and BMD at the&nbsp;mid forearm site; no differences were detected for BMD at&nbsp;other skeletal sites.Conclusion:&nbsp;Higher alcohol intake was associated with&nbsp;greater total and central adiposity and reduced bone&nbsp;quality.<br /

Genome of the Avirulent Human-Infective Trypanosome—Trypanosoma rangeli

Background: Trypanosoma rangeli is a hemoflagellate protozoan parasite infecting humans and other wild and domestic mammals across Central and South America. It does not cause human disease, but it can be mistaken for the etiologic agent of Chagas disease, Trypanosoma cruzi. We have sequenced the T. rangeli genome to provide new tools for elucidating the distinct and intriguing biology of this species and the key pathways related to interaction with its arthropod and mammalian hosts.  Methodology/Principal Findings: The T. rangeli haploid genome is ,24 Mb in length, and is the smallest and least repetitive trypanosomatid genome sequenced thus far. This parasite genome has shorter subtelomeric sequences compared to those of T. cruzi and T. brucei; displays intraspecific karyotype variability and lacks minichromosomes. Of the predicted 7,613 protein coding sequences, functional annotations could be determined for 2,415, while 5,043 are hypothetical proteins, some with evidence of protein expression. 7,101 genes (93%) are shared with other trypanosomatids that infect humans. An ortholog of the dcl2 gene involved in the T. brucei RNAi pathway was found in T. rangeli, but the RNAi machinery is non-functional since the other genes in this pathway are pseudogenized. T. rangeli is highly susceptible to oxidative stress, a phenotype that may be explained by a smaller number of anti-oxidant defense enzymes and heatshock proteins.  Conclusions/Significance: Phylogenetic comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial genes indicates that T. rangeli and T. cruzi are equidistant from T. brucei. In addition to revealing new aspects of trypanosome co-evolution within the vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, comparative genomic analysis with pathogenic trypanosomatids provides valuable new information that can be further explored with the aim of developing better diagnostic tools and/or therapeutic targets

The Role of Body Mass Index, Insulin, and Adiponectin in the Relation Between Fat Distribution and Bone Mineral Density

Despite the positive association between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC), the role of fat distribution in BMD/BMC remains unclear. We examined relationships between BMD/BMC and various measurements of fat distribution and studied the role of BMI, insulin, and adiponectin in these relations. Using a cross-sectional investigation of 2631 participants from the Erasmus Rucphen Family study, we studied associations between BMD (using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA]) at the hip, lumbar spine, total body (BMD and BMC), and fat distribution by the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-thigh ratio (WTR), and DXA-based trunk-to-leg fat ratio and android-to-gynoid fat ratio. Analyses were stratified by gender and median age (48.0 years in women and 49.2 years in men) and were performed with and without adjustment for BMI, fasting insulin, and adiponectin. Using linear regression (adjusting for age, height, smoking, and use of alcohol), most relationships between fat distribution and BMD and BMC were positive, except for WTR. After BMI adjustment, most correlations were negative except for trunk-to-leg fat ratio in both genders. No consistent influence of age or menopausal status was found. Insulin and adiponectin levels did not explain either positive or negative associations. In conclusion, positive associations between android fat distribution and BMD/BMC are explained by higher BMI but not by higher insulin and/or lower adiponectin levels. Inverse associations after adjustment for BMI suggest that android fat deposition as measured by the WHR, WTR, and DXA-based android-to-gynoid fat ratio is not beneficial and possibly even deleterious for bone