Gastric Cancer Surgery

Le cancer de l’estomac est l’une des principales causes de mortalité par cancer dans le monde. Même si des progrès dans les traitements non chirurgicaux ont été réalisés, avec l’avènement de la chimiothérapie périopératoire, la chirurgie reste au centre de la prise en charge de ces tumeurs, représentant la seule option curative à l’heure actuelle, si une résection complète dite « R0 » peut être obtenue. Des recommandations ont ainsi été émises par la Société Française de Chirurgie Digestive (SFCD) et l’Association de Chirurgie Hépato-Biliaire et Transplantation (ACHBT), recommandations labellisées par l’Institut National du Cancer (INCa). Le but de cet article est de discuter de l’étendue de la résection digestive et du curage ganglionnaire ainsi que de la technique de reconstruction digestive à effectuer, et de préciser la place de la chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale et de la chirurgie palliative dans la prise en charge des adénocarcinomes gastriques

Outcomes of a new slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh (Phasix (TM)) in potentially contaminated incisional hernias : a prospective, multi-center, single-arm trial

Background: Resorbable biomaterials have been developed to reduce the amount of foreign material remaining in the body after hernia repair over the long-term. However, on the short-term, these resorbable materials should render acceptable results with regard to complications, infections, and reoperations to be considered for repair. Additionally, the rate of resorption should not be any faster than collagen deposition and maturation; leading to early hernia recurrence. Therefore, the objective of this study was to collect data on the short-term performance of a new resorbable biosynthetic mesh (Phasix (TM)) in patients requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair. Materials and methods: A prospective, multi-center, single-arm trial was conducted at surgical departments in 15 hospitals across Europe. Patients aged >= 18, scheduled to undergo elective Ventral Hernia Working Group Grade 3 hernia repair of a hernia larger than 10 cm(2) were included. Hernia repair was performed with Phasix (TM) Mesh in sublay position when achievable. The primary outcome was the rate of surgical site occurrence (SSO), including infections, that required intervention until 3 months after repair. Results: In total, 84 patients were treated with Phasix (TM) Mesh. Twenty-two patients (26.2%) developed 32 surgical site occurrences. These included 11 surgical site infections, 9 wound dehiscences, 7 seromas, 2 hematomas, 2 skin necroses, and 1 fistula. No significant differences in surgical site occurrence development were found between groups repaired with or without component separation technique, and between clean-contaminated or contaminated wound sites. At three months, there were no hernia recurrences. Conclusion: Phasix (TM) Mesh demonstrated acceptable postoperative surgical site occurrence rates in patients with a Ventral Hernia Working Group Grade 3 hernia. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the recurrence rate and the effects on quality of life. This study is ongoing through 24 months of follow-up

Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma

PURPOSE: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158). RESULTS: IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P = .03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P &lt; .001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P = .27 (consistency P = .26, heterogeneity P = .0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P = .036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P = .003, .012, respectively). CONCLUSION:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.</p

Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Open transthoracic oesophagectomy is the standard treatment for infracarinal resectable oesophageal carcinomas, although it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates of 2 to 10% and 30 to 50%, respectively, for both the abdominal and thoracic approaches. The worldwide popularity of laparoscopic techniques is based on promising results, including lower postoperative morbidity rates, which are related to the reduced postoperative trauma. We hypothesise that the laparoscopic abdominal approach (laparoscopic gastric mobilisation) in oesophageal cancer surgery will decrease the major postoperative complication rate due to the reduced surgical trauma.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The MIRO trial is an open, controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre phase III trial. Patients in study arm A will receive laparoscopic-assisted oesophagectomy, i.e., a transthoracic oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilisation. Patients in study arm B will receive the same procedure, but with the conventional open abdominal approach. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the major postoperative 30-day morbidity. Secondary objectives are to assess the overall 30-day morbidity, 30-day mortality, 30-day pulmonary morbidity, disease-free survival, overall survival as well as quality of life and to perform medico-economic analysis. A total of 200 patients will be enrolled, and two safety analyses will be performed using 25 and 50 patients included in arm A.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Postoperative morbidity remains high after oesophageal cancer surgery, especially due to major pulmonary complications, which are responsible for 50% of the postoperative deaths. This study represents the first randomised controlled phase III trial to evaluate the benefits of the minimally invasive approach with respect to the postoperative course and oncological outcomes in oesophageal cancer surgery.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p><a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00937456">NCT00937456</a> (ClinicalTrials.gov)</p

Trials

BACKGROUND: Postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistula (PUGIF) is a devastating complication, leading to high mortality (reaching up to 80%), increased length of hospital stay, reduced health-related quality of life and increased health costs. Nutritional support is a key component of therapy in such cases, which is related to the high prevalence of malnutrition. In the prophylactic setting, enteral nutrition (EN) is associated with a shorter hospital stay, a lower incidence of severe infectious complications, lower severity of complications and decreased cost compared to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) following major upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. There is little evidence available for the curative setting after fistula occurrence. We hypothesize that EN increases the 30-day fistula closure rate in PUGIF, allowing better health-related quality of life without increasing the morbidity or mortality. METHODS/DESIGN: The NUTRILEAK trial is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase III trial to assess the efficacy of EN (the experimental group) compared with TPN (the control group) in patients with PUGIF. The primary objective of the study is to compare EN versus TPN in the treatment of PUGIF (after esophagogastric resection including bariatric surgery, duodenojejunal resection or pancreatic resection with digestive tract violation) in terms of the 30-day fistula closure rate. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the 6-month postrandomization fistula closure rate, time of first fistula closure (in days), the medical- and surgical treatment-related complication rate at 6 months after randomization, the fistula-related complication rate at 6 months after randomization, the type and severity of early (30 days after randomization) and late fistula-related complications (over 30 days after randomization), 30-day and 6-month postrandomization mortality rate, nutritional status at day 30, day 60, day 90 and day 180 postrandomization, the mean length of hospital stay, the patient's health-related quality of life (by self-assessment questionnaire), oral feeding time and direct costs of treatment. A total of 321 patients will be enrolled. DISCUSSION: The two nutritional supports are already used in daily practice, but most surgeons are reluctant to use the enteral route in case of PUGIF. This study will be the first randomized trial testing the role of EN versus TPN in PUGIF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03742752. Registered on 14 November 2018.This research program is funded by the French Ministry of Health through Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique 2016

Enucléation des tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales de l'oesophage (jusqu'où peut peut on aller sans compromettre le résultat oncologique)

But du travail : Les tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales oesophagiennes sont des tumeurs rares pour lesquelles l'oesophagectomie est actuellement la prise en charge chirurgicale recommandée. Le but de notre travail était d'évaluer la faisabilité de l énucléation pour une GIST oesophagienne et ses résultats oncologiques afin d essayer de mieux définir la place de cette technique dans la prise en charge de ces tumeurs rares. Patients et méthodes : Par le biais d'une large enquête nationale rétrospective, 19 patients pris en charge pour une GIST oesophagienne ont été identifiés entre 2001 et 2010. Les caractéristiques tumorales, périopératoires et les résultats oncologiques des patients ayant bénéficié d une énucléation ont été comparés à ceux ayant eu une oesophagectomie. Résultats : Sur les 19 patients inclus dans l'étude, 16 ont pu bénéficier d'une exerèse chirurgicale : 8 énucléations et 8 oesophagectomies. Dans le groupe énucléation, le diamètre tumoral médian était de 40mm [18-65], aucune ne présentait d ulcération muqueuse et il n y eut aucune rupture capsulaire ou de résection incomplète. Dans le groupe oesophagectomie, le diamètre tumoral médian était de 85 mm [55-250], avec une ulcération muqueuse chez 4 patients, un cas de brèche capsulaire peropératoire et aucun cas de résection incomplète. Les index mitotiques tumoraux étaient comparables entre les deux groupes (p=1,000). Le taux de complications sévère était de 50% dans le groupe oesophagectomie contre 25% dans le groupe énucléation (P=0,302) avec deux décès précoces dans le groupe oesophagectomie. Après un suivi médian de 6,4 ans similaire entre les deux groupes, aucun cas de récidive n était retrouvé dans le groupe énucléation contre deux dans le groupe oesophagectomie. L'énucléation après réalisation d'une biopsie préopératoire n'était pas associée à une surmorbidté ou à une augmentation du risque de récidive locale. Une ulcération muqueuse en endoscopie traduisait le caractère aggressif de la tumeur. Conclusion : l énucléation est faisable pour des GIST oesophagiennes de moins de 65mm. L oesophagectomie est à réserver aux tumeurs plus volumineuses, notamment en cas d'ulcération muqueuse.LILLE2-BU Santé-Recherche (593502101) / SudocSudocFranceF