37 research outputs found

    Prognostic value of coronary calcification—I

    Get PDF

    Intermittent coronary sinus occlusion in dogs: Reduction of infarct size 10 days after reperfusion

    Get PDF
    Intermittent balloon occlusion of the coronary sinus was applied to 11 open chest dogs subjected to 3 hours of ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 8 to 12 days of reperfusion. Anticoagulants were not given during the reperfusion period. Risk region was assessed by planimetry of autoradiographs made from ventricular slices. Infarct size was equivalent when assessed by planimetry of ventricular slices before and after staining with triphenyltetrazolium chloride. In the seven survivors, 30 ± 8% of the risk region was in-farcted. Seven of 11 control dogs survived (p = NS); 75 ± 4% of the risk region was infarcted in the control animals (p < 0.01 versus treated survivors). Light microscopic inspection of specimens stained with hematox-ylin-eosin confirmed the border between necrotic and preserved myocardium. Thrombus was observed in the coronary sinus in all survivors in the treatment group.These findings confirm earlier short-term studies that demonstrated a potent anti-ischemic effect of intermittent coronary sinus occlusion. At the same time, coronary sinus thrombosis warrants caution in the application of this technique to myocardial ischemia in humans

    Comparison of electron beam computed tomography scanning and conventional risk factor assessment for the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjective. To determine whether electron beam computed tomography (CT) adds to conventional risk factor assessment in the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease.Background. Electron beam CT scanning can be used to predict the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, but whether it does so independently of conventional risk factors is unclear.Methods. Electron beam CT scans were performed and conventional risk factors were measured in 290 men and women undergoing coronary arteriography for clinical indications. The association of the electron beam CT-derived coronary artery calcium score and conventional risk factors with the presence and severity of angiographically defined coronary atherosclerosis was analyzed by logistic regression and receiver-operator characteristics analysis.Results. Age, the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and the coronary calcium score were significantly and independently associated with the presence of any coronary disease and obstructive coronary disease. In association with any coronary disease, odds ratios for age, the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol and calcium score, highest quartile vs. lowest quartile, were 6.01 (95% confidence interval 2.87 to 12.56), 3.14 (1.56 to 6.31) and 94.08 (21.06 to 420.12), respectively. For obstructive coronary disease, highest quartile vs. lowest quartile, the respective odds ratios for age, the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL and calcium score were 3.86 (1.86 to 8.00), 4.11 (1.98 to 8.52) and 34.12 (12.67 to 91.86). Male gender was also significantly associated with any coronary disease (odds ratio 2.19, p = 0.04) and obstructive coronary disease (odds ratio 2.07, p = 0.04). Cigarette smoking was significantly associated with any coronary disease (odds ratio = 2.74, p = 0.004), and diabetes was significantly associated with obstructive disease (odds ratio 3.16, p = 0.01). After adjustment for the coronary calcium score and other risk factors, it was determined that triglycerides, family history and hypertension were not significantly associated with any disease state. A coronary calcium score ≥80 (Agatston method) was associated with an increased likelihood of any coronary disease regardless of the number of risk factors, and a coronary calcium score ≥170 was associated with an increased likelihood of obstructive coronary disease regardless of the number of risk factors (p < 0.001).Conclusion. Electron beam CT scanning offers improved discrimination over conventional risk factors in the identification of persons with any angiographic coronary disease or angiographic obstructive coronary disease

    The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Reply

    No full text

    Coronary Calcification, Coronary Disease Risk Factors, C-Reactive Protein, and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events The St. Francis Heart Study

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic accuracy of electron beam computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the coronary arteries and the relationship of coronary calcification to standard coronary disease risk factors and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events in apparently healthy middle-age persons.BackgroundAs a screening test for coronary artery disease (CAD), electron beam CT scanning remains controversial.MethodsIn a prospective, population-based study, 4,903 asymptomatic persons age 50 to 70 years underwent electron beam CT scanning of the coronary arteries.ResultsAt 4.3 years, follow-up was available in 4,613 participants (94%), and 119 had sustained at least one ASCVD event. Subjects with ASCVD events had higher baseline coronary calcium scores (median [interquartile range], Agatston method) than those without events: 384 (127, 800) versus 10 (0, 86) (p < 0.0001). For coronary calcium score threshold ≥100 versus <100, relative risk (95% confidence interval) was 9.6 (6.7 to 13.9) for all ASCVD events, 11.1 (7.3 to 16.7) for all CAD events, and 9.2 (4.9 to 17.3) for non-fatal myocardial infarction and death. The coronary calcium score predicted CAD events independently of standard risk factors and CRP (p = 0.004), was superior to the Framingham risk index in the prediction of events (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.79 ± 0.03 vs. 0.69 ± 0.03, p = 0.0006), and enhanced stratification of those falling into the Framingham categories of low, intermediate, and high risk (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe electron beam CT coronary calcium score predicts CAD events independent of standard risk factors, more accurately than standard risk factors and CRP, and refines Framingham risk stratification
    corecore