Structural Properties, Order-Disorder Phenomena and Phase Stability of Orotic Acid Crystal Forms

Orotic acid (OTA) is reported to exist in the anhydrous (AH), monohydrate (Hy1) and dimethylsulfoxide monosolvate (SDMSO) forms. In this study we investigate the (de)hydration/desolvation behavior, aiming at an understanding of the elusive structural features of anhydrous OTA by a combination of experimental and computational techniques, namely, thermal analytical methods, gravimetric moisture (de)sorption studies, water activity measurements, X-ray powder diffraction, spectroscopy (vibrational, solid-state NMR), crystal energy landscape and chemical shift calculations. The Hy1 is a highly stable hydrate, which dissociates above 135°C and loses only a small part of the water when stored over desiccants (25°C) for more than one year. In Hy1, orotic acid and water molecules are linked by strong hydrogen bonds in nearly perfectly planar arranged stacked layers. The layers are spaced by 3.1 Å and not linked via hydrogen-bonds. Upon dehydration the X-ray powder diffraction and solid-state NMR peaks become broader indicating some disorder in the anhydrous form. The Hy1 stacking reflection (122) is maintained, suggesting that the OTA molecules are still arranged in stacked layers in the dehydration product. Desolvation of SDMSO, a non-layer structure, results in the same AH phase as observed upon dehydrating Hy1. Depending on the desolvation conditions different levels of order-disorder of layers present in anhydrous OTA are observed, which is also suggested by the computed low energy crystal structures. These structures provide models for stacking faults as intergrowth of different layers is possible. The variability in anhydrate crystals is of practical concern as it affects the moisture dependent stability of AH with respect to hydration

Extensive sequential polymorphic interconversion in the solid-state: Two hydrates and ten anhydrous phases of hexamidine diisethionate

Crystal polymorphism and solvent inclusion is a dominant research area in the pharmaceutical industry and continues to unveil complex systems. Here, we present the solid-state system of hexamidine diisethionate (HDI), an antiseptic drug compound forming a dimorphic dihydrate as well as ten anhydrous polymorphs. The X-ray and neutron crystal structures of the hydrated crystal forms and related interaction energies show no direct interaction between the cation and water but very strong interactions between cation and anion, and anion and water. This is observed macroscopically as high stability of the hydrate against dehydration by temperature and humidity. The anhydrous polymorphs reveal a rare case of sequential and reversible polymorphic transformations, which are characterized by thermal analysis and variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). While most transitions are accompanied by significant structural changes, the low-energy transitions can only be detected as slight changes in the reflection positions with temperature. HDI thus represents a model compound to investigate polymorphic transitions with small structural changes

Why Do Some Molecules Form Hydrates or Solvates?

The discovery of solvates (crystal structures where the solvent is incorporated into the lattice) dates back to the dawn of chemistry. The phenomenon is ubiquitous, with important applications ranging from the development of pharmaceuticals to the potential capture of CO2 from the atmosphere. Despite this interest, we still do not fully understand why some molecules form solvates. We have employed molecular simulations using simple models of solute and solvent molecules whose interaction parameters could be modulated at will to access a universe of molecules that do and do not form solvates. We investigated the phase behavior of these model solute–solvent systems as a function of solute–solvent affinity, molecule size ratio, and solute concentration. The simulations demonstrate that the primary criterion for solvate formation is that the solute–solvent affinity must be sufficient to overwhelm the solute–solute and solvent–solvent affinities. Strong solute–solvent affinity in itself is not a sufficient condition for solvate formation: in the absence of such strong affinity, a solvate may still form provided that the self-affinities of the solute and the solvent are weaker in relative terms. We show that even solvent-phobic molecules can be induced to form solvates by virtue of a pΔV potential arising either from a more efficient packing or because of high pressure overcoming the energy penalty

Study of the Recrystallization in Coated Pellets

Coated multiparticulate systems are increasingly popular on the market. Their manufacture in a fluid bed often requires polymer binders. [...