17 research outputs found

    A model-integrated multipoint Bayesian analysis of hypertension in the Framingham Heart Study data finds little evidence of linkage

    Get PDF
    This Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 contribution presents a linkage analysis of hypertension in the Framingham data based on the posterior probability of linkage, or PPL. We dichotomized the phenotype, coding individuals who had been treated for hypertension at any time, as well as those with repeated high blood pressure measurements, as affected. Here we use a new variation on the multipoint PPL that incorporates integration over the genetic model. PPLs were computed for chromosomes 1 through 5, 11, 14, and 17 and remained below the 2% assumed prior probability of linkage for 73% of the locations examined. The maximum PPL of 4.5% was obtained on chromosome 1 at 178 cM. Although this is more than twice the assumed prior probability of linkage, it is well below a level at which we would recommend committing substantial additional resources to molecular follow-up. While the PPL analysis of this data remains inconclusive, Bayesian methodology gives us a clear mechanism for using the information gained here in further studies

    Posterior probability of linkage analysis of autism dataset identifies linkage to chromosome 16

    Get PDF
    To apply phenotypic and statistical methods designed to account for heterogeneity to linkage analyses of the autism Collaborative Linkage Study of Autism (CLSA) affected sibling pair families

    Effects of Updating Linkage Evidence across Subsets of Data: Reanalysis of the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange Data Set

    Get PDF
    Results of autism linkage studies have been difficult to interpret across research groups, prompting the use of ever-increasing sample sizes to increase power. However, increasing sample size by pooling disparate collections for a single analysis may, in fact, not increase power in the face of genetic heterogeneity. Here, we applied the posterior probability of linkage (PPL), a method designed specifically to analyze multiple heterogeneous data sets, to the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange collection of families by analyzing six clinically defined subsets of the data and updating the PPL sequentially over the subsets. Our results indicate a substantial probability of linkage to chromosome 1, which had been previously overlooked; our findings also provide a further characterization of the possible parent-of-origin effects at the 17q11 locus that were previously described in this sample. This analysis illustrates that the way in which heterogeneity is addressed in linkage analysis can dramatically affect the overall conclusions of a linkage study

    Mutation Screening of Candidate Genes in Patients with Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis

    No full text
    International audienceBackground-Craniosynostosis is a condition that includes the premature fusion of one or multiple cranial sutures. Among various craniosynostosis forms, midline sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (sNSC) is the most prevalent. Although different gene mutations have been identified in some craniosynostosis syndromes, the etiology of sNSC remains largely unknown.Methods: To screen for candidate genes for sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, the authors sequenced DNA of 93 sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients from a population-based study conducted in Iowa and New York states. FGFR1-3 mutational hotspots and the entire TWIST1, RAB23, and BMP2 coding regions were screened because of their known roles in human nonsyndromic or syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis, expression patterns, and/or animal model studies.Results: The authors identified two rare variants in their cohort. A FGFR1 insertion c.730_731insG, which led to a premature stop codon, was predicted to abolish the entire immunoglobulin-like III domain, including the ligand-binding region. A c.439C>G variant was observed in TWIST1 at its highly conserved loop domain in another patient. The patient’s mother harbored the same variant and was reported with jaw abnormalities. These two variants were not detected in 116 alleles from unaffected controls or seen in the several databases; however, TWIST1 variant was found in a low frequency of 0.000831 percent in Exome Aggregation Consortium database.Conclusions: The low mutation detection rate indicates that these genes account for only a small proportion of sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients. The authors’ results add to the perception that sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is a complex developmental defect with considerable genetic heterogeneity

    Cancer Risk in Children and Adolescents with Birth Defects: A Population-Based Cohort Study

    No full text
    <div><p>Objective</p><p>Birth defects are an increasing health priority worldwide, and the subject of a major 2010 World Health Assembly Resolution. Excess cancer risk may be an added burden in this vulnerable group of children, but studies to date have provided inconsistent findings. This study assessed the risk for cancer in children and young adolescents with major birth defects.</p><p>Methods and Findings</p><p>This retrospective, statewide, population-based, cohort study was conducted in three US states (Utah, Arizona, Iowa). A cohort of 44,151 children and young adolescents (0 through 14 years of age) with selected major, non-chromosomal birth defects or chromosomal anomalies was compared to a reference cohort of 147,940 children without birth defects randomly sampled from each state’s births and frequency matched by year of birth. The primary outcome was rate of cancer prior to age 15 years, by type of cancer and type of birth defect. The incidence of cancer was increased 2.9-fold (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.7) in children with birth defects (123 cases of cancer) compared to the reference cohort; the incidence rates were 33.8 and 11.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. However, the excess risk varied markedly by type of birth defect. Increased risks were seen in children with microcephaly, cleft palate, and selected eye, cardiac, and renal defects. Cancer risk was not increased with many common birth defects, including hypospadias, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, or hydrocephalus.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Children with some structural, non-chromosomal birth defects, but not others, have a moderately increased risk for childhood cancer. Information on such selective risk can promote more effective clinical evaluation, counseling, and research.</p></div

    Risk for specific types of cancer in children with Down syndrome (trisomy 21), UTAZIA study.

    No full text
    <p>UTAZIA: Utah, Arizona, Iowa.</p>*<p>Rates are per 100,000 Person Years.</p>†<p><i>P</i> < 0.05;</p>‡<p><i>P</i> < 0.01;</p>§<p><i>P</i> < 0.001 for incidence rate ratios vs. reference cohort.</p

    Risk for cancer by type of chromosomal anomaly and major birth defect, UTAZIA study.

    No full text
    <p>UTAZIA: Utah, Arizona, Iowa.</p>*<p>Rates are per 100,000 Person Years.</p>†<p><i>P</i> < 0.05 for incidence rate ratios (vs. reference cohort).</p><p>NOS, not otherwise specified; NEC, not elsewhere classified; TE fistula, tracheosophageal fistula.</p

    Cohorts, follow-up time, and surveillance programs, UTAZIA study.

    No full text
    <p>UTAZIA: Utah, Arizona, Iowa.</p>*<p>Follow-up was from birth up to but excluding the 15<sup>th</sup> birthday.</p>†<p>NPCR, National Program of Cancer Registries; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program.</p

    Risk for specific types of cancer in children with structural birth defects, UTAZIA study. Chromosomal conditions were excluded.

    No full text
    <p>UTAZIA: Utah, Arizona, Iowa.</p>*<p>Rates are per 100,000 Person Years.</p>†<p><i>P</i> < 0.05;</p>‡<p><i>P</i> < 0.01;</p>§<p><i>P</i> < 0.001 for incidence rate ratios vs. reference cohort.</p
    corecore