Cellular distribution of cis-diaminedichloroplatinum (II)-DNA binding in rat dorsal root spinal ganglia: effect of the neuroprotecting peptide Org.2766

The in situ binding of the anticancer drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisDDP) to DNA was studied in the rat dorsal root spinal ganglion (DRG), using an antiserum against cisDDP-modified calfthymus DNA in a quantitative immunocytochemical assay. Rats received a dose of cisDDP (1 mg/kg), two times a week, up to a cumulative dose of 15 mg/kg (group I) or 34 mg/kg (group II). Rats of group III were given a single dose of 15 mg/kg. Rats were killed 48 hr (groups I and II) or 6 hr (group III) after the last injection. In groups I and II cisDDP-induced neurological damage was assessed by measuring both motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (MNCV and SNCV). Whereas the MNCV was not influenced by the treatment with cisDDP, the SNCV decreased significantly. The level of cisDDP-DNA binding in DRG satellite cells equalled that in liver cells, but binding could not be shown in DRG neuron nuclei. The level of cisDDP-DNA binding in spinal cord and brain was very low. The neuroprotecting peptide ORG.2766, an ACTH49 analog, was given sc (10 g/rat) four times a week concomitantly with cisDDP to some rats of groups I and II. ORG.2766 prevented the decrease of the SNCV, but did not change the extent of cisDDP-DNA binding in satellite or liver cells. It is concluded that the amelioration of cisDDP toxicity by ORG.2766 is not directly related to the cisDDP-DNA binding in satellite cells

Healthcare professionals' perspectives of barriers and facilitators in implementing physical activity programmes delivered to cancer survivors in a shared-care model: a qualitative study

Contains fulltext : 220436.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: The positive impact of physical activity programmes has been recognised, but the current uptake is low. Authorities believe delivering these programmes in a shared-care model is a future perspective. The present study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators affecting physical activity programme implementation in a shared-care model delivered with the cooperation of all the types of healthcare professionals involved. METHODS: Thirty-one individual interviews with primary healthcare professionals (PHPs) and four focus group interviews with 39 secondary healthcare professionals (SHPs) were undertaken. We used Grol and Flottorp's theoretical models to identify barriers and facilitators in six domains: (1) physical activity programmes, (2) patients, (3) healthcare professionals, (4) social setting, (5) organisation and (6) law and governance. RESULTS: In the domain of physical activity programmes, those physical activity programmes that were non-tailored to the patients' needs impeded successful implementation. In the domain of healthcare professionals, the knowledge and skills pertaining to physical activity programmes and non-commitment of healthcare professionals impeded implementation. HCPs expressed their concerns about the negative influence of the patient's social network. Most barriers occurred in the domain of organisation. The PHPs and SHPs raised concerns about ineffective collaboration and networks between hospitals. Only the PHPs raised concerns about poor communication, indeterminate roles, and lack of collaboration with SHPs. Insufficient and unclear insurance coverage of physical activity programmes was a barrier in the domain of law and governance. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the domain of organisation seems the most challenging because the collaboration, communication, networks, and interactive roles between the PHPs and SHPs are all inadequate. Survivor care plans, more use of health information technology, improved rehabilitation guidelines, and better networks might benefit implementing physical activity programmes