The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian

This paper reports the results of a production experiment that explores the prosodic realization of focus in Hungarian, a language that is characterized by obligatory syntactic focus marking. Our study investigates narrow focus in sentences in which focus is unambiguously marked by syntactic means, comparing it to broad focus sentences. Potential independent effects of the salience (textual givenness) of the background of the narrow focus and the contrastiveness of the focus are controlled for and are also examined.The results show that both continuous phonetic measures and categorical factors such as the distribution of contour types are affected by the focus-related factors, despite the presence of syntactic focus marking. The phonetic effects found are mostly parallel to those of typical prosodic focus marking languages like English. The prosodic prominence required of focus is realized through changes to the scaling and slope of F0 targets and contours. The asymmetric prominence relation between the focus and the background can be expressed not only by the phonetic marking of the prominence of the focused element, but also by the phonetic marking of the reduced prominence of the background. Furthermore, contrastiveness of focus and (textual) givenness of the background show independent phonetic effects, both of them affecting the realization of the background. These results are argued to shed light on alternative approaches to the information structural notion of contrastive focus and the relation between the notions of focus and givenness

Does Constitutive Expression of Defense-Related Genes and Salicylic Acid Concentrations Correlate with Field Resistance of Potato to Black Scurf Disease?

Black scurf disease on potato caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG3 occurs worldwide and is difficult to control. The use of potato cultivars resistant to black scurf disease could be part of an integrated control strategy. Currently, the degree of resistance is based on symptom assessment in the field, but molecular measures could provide a more efficient screening method. We hypothesized that the degree of field resistance to black scurf disease in potato cultivars is associated with defense-related gene expression levels and salicylic acid (SA) concentration. Cultivars with a moderate and severe appearance of disease symptoms on tubers were selected and cultivated in the same field. In addition, experiments were conducted under controlled conditions in an axenic in vitro culture and in a sand culture to analyze the constitutive expression of defense-related genes and SA concentration. The more resistant cultivars did not show significantly higher constitutive expression levels of defense-related genes. Moreover, the level of free SA was increased in the more resistant cultivars only in the roots of the plantlets grown in the sand culture. These results indicate that neither expression levels of defense-related genes nor the amount of SA in potato plants can be used as reliable predictors of the field resistance of potato genotypes to black scurf disease

Correction:How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the necessity of animal research (vol 30, pg R1014, 2020)

(Current Biology 30, R1014–R1018; September 21, 2020) As a result of an author oversight in the originally published version of this article, a number of errors were introduced in the author list and affiliations. First, the middle initials were omitted from the names of several authors. Second, the surname of Dr. van Dam was mistakenly written as “Dam.” Third, the first name of author Bernhard Englitz was misspelled as “Bernard” and the surname of author B.J.A. Pollux was misspelled as “Pullox.” Finally, Dr. Keijer's first name was abbreviated rather than written in full. These errors, as well as various errors in the author affiliations, have now been corrected online

Cohort profile:the MUNICH Preterm and Term Clinical study (MUNICH-PreTCl), a neonatal birth cohort with focus on prenatal and postnatal determinants of infant and childhood morbidity

Purpose The MUNICH Preterm and Term Clinical (MUNICH-PreTCl) birth cohort was established to uncover pathological processes contributing to infant/childhood morbidity and mortality. We collected comprehensive medical information of healthy and sick newborns and their families, together with infant blood samples for proteomic analysis. MUNICH-PreTCl aims to identify mechanism-based biomarkers in infant health and disease to deliver more precise diagnostic and predictive information for disease prevention. We particularly focused on risk factors for pregnancy complications, family history of genetically influenced health conditions such as diabetes and paediatric long-term health—all to be further monitored and correlated with proteomics data in the future.Participants Newborns and their parents were recruited from the Perinatal Center at the LMU University Hospital, Munich, between February 2017 and June 2019. Infants without congenital anomalies, delivered at 23–41 weeks of gestation, were eligible.Findings Findings to date concern the clinical data and extensive personal patient information. A total of 662 infants were recruited, 44% were female (36% in preterm, 46% in term). 90% of approached families agreed to participate. Neonates were grouped according to gestational age: extremely preterm (<28 weeks, N=28), very preterm (28 to <32 weeks, N=36), late preterm (32 to <37 weeks, N=97) and term infants (>37+0 weeks, N=501). We collected over 450 data points per child–parent set, (family history, demographics, pregnancy, birth and daily follow-ups throughout hospitalisation) and 841 blood samples longitudinally. The completion rates for medical examinations and blood samples were 100% and 95% for the questionnaire.Future plans The correlation of large clinical datasets with proteomic phenotypes, together with the use of medical registries, will enable future investigations aiming to decipher mechanisms of disorders in a systems biology perspective.Trial registration number DRKS (00024189); Pre-results

Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech

Speakers frequently have a choice among multiple ways of expressing one and the same thought. When choosing between syntactic constructions for expressing a given meaning, speakers are sensitive to probabilistic tenden-cies for syntactic, semantic or contextual properties of an utterance to favor one construction or another. Taken together, such tendencies may align to make one construction overwhelmingly more probable, marginally more probable, or no more probable than another. Here, we present evidence that acoustic features of spontaneous speech reflect these probabilities: when speakers choose a less probable construction, they are more likely to be disfluent, and their fluent words are likely to have a relatively longer du-ration. Conversely, words in more probable constructions are shorter and spoken more fluently. Our findings suggest that the di¤ering probabilities of a syntactic construction in context are not epiphenomenal, but reflect a part of a speakers ’ knowledge of their language