Fish distributions reveal discrepancies between zonal attachment and quota allocations

PF and NF were funded by the Horizon 2020 European research project ClimeFish (grant No. 677039). PF also received a small grant from the Scottish Fishermen's Federation. Data are freely available at https://datras.ices.dk/Data_products/Download/Download_Data_public.aspx. EEZs shapefiles came from www.marineregions.org and bathymetry from www.bodc.ac.uk. Analysis code is available at the GitHub repository: https://github.com/niafall/zonal-attachment.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Too Much Data? Never Enough! Cost-Efficient Collections Acquisitions Decision Making Through Data Analysis

Libraries are increasingly called upon to efficiently use collection dollars in creative ways. Content needs are ever increasing, and, with the growing range of format and delivery options, finding means to identify resources that provide unique, or added, value is essential. Libraries regularly receive offers of sale pricing, or reduced pricing, for the subscription or purchase of multititle collections. Most often, these packages are for online content that the library may, or may not, have already acquired in one of the multiple formats available. In an environment of multiple formats, ISBNs and/or ISSNs per title, variable titles, and alternate imprint or copublishing, identifying the unique or duplicated holdings of library collections becomes a major challenge. The knowledge bases supporting booksellers, serials agents, and discovery tool providers strive to do a good job of linking content available in different formats and on different platforms. Although these vendors robustly provide alternate format, title, provider, and imprint data on a title-by-title basis, none of their administrative tools provide the library customer with the ability to easily compare aggregate data held in the knowledge base with data extracted from a title package list. This paper presents a description of library data needs and bookseller data provision goals, followed by a review of the power and functional limitations of current marketplace tools. Practical examples are provided of how these tools may be used to guide collection development and make wise acquisitions decisions

Four Regional Marine Biodiversity Studies: Approaches and Contributions to Ecosystem-Based Management

We compare objectives and approaches of four regional studies of marine biodiversity: Gulf of Maine Area Census of Marine Life, Baltic Sea History of Marine Animal Populations, Great Barrier Reef Seabed Biodiversity Project, and Gulf of Mexico Biodiversity Project. Each program was designed as an "ecosystem" scale but was created independently and executed differently. Each lasted 8 to 10 years, including several years to refine program objectives, raise funding, and develop research networks. All resulted in improved baseline data and in new, or revised, data systems. Each contributed to the creation or evolution of interdisciplinary teams, and to regional, national, or international science-management linkages. To date, there have been differing extents of delivery and use of scientific information to and by management, with greatest integration by the program designed around specific management questions. We evaluate each research program's relative emphasis on three principal elements of biodiversity organization: composition, structure, and function. This approach is used to analyze existing ecosystem-wide biodiversity knowledge and to assess what is known and where gaps exist. In all four of these systems and studies, there is a relative paucity of investigation on functional elements of biodiversity, when compared with compositional and structural elements. This is symptomatic of the current state of the science. Substantial investment in understanding one or more biodiversity element(s) will allow issues to be addressed in a timely and more integrative fashion. Evaluating research needs and possible approaches across specific elements of biodiversity organization can facilitate planning of future studies and lead to more effective communication between scientists, managers, and stakeholders. Building a general approach that captures how various studies have focused on different biodiversity elements can also contribute to meta-analyses of worldwide experience in scientific research to support ecosystem-based management

The Horror of the Real: Filmic Form, The Century, and Fritz Lang's M

It is not surprising that film became the dominant art form of the twentieth century. The promise of a medium that could capture life in motion proved exciting, though soon after its conception, debates cropped up pitting the merits of realism against those of expressionism. Should a medium predicated on recording life adopt expressionistic sensibilities? Writing on the burgeoning cinema, Walter Benjamin seemed to imply that film carried with it a distinctly political responsibility to show life as it really is. In attempting to rethink this argument, I argue for the political potential of an expressionistic cinema, as understood by considering the theoretical underpinnings of Alain Badiou’s The Century (2008) when read in relation to Fritz Lang’s M (1931)—a film that embodies Badiou’s musings on the twentieth century’s aesthetic ideals and violent tendencies. Badiou writes that “the torment of contemporary art” is that it is situated at a crossroads between “romantic pathos, on the one hand, and a nihilistic iconoclasm” on the other: a knowing admission that the Real can never be truly represented, and an oppositional desire to convey it anyways. M knowingly exposes these aesthetic contradictions at the heart of the filmic medium by leaning into its own artificiality, and, in doing so, it prophetically exposes the thinking behind a growingly fascist German state in the 1930s. By the end of my paper, I arrive at the conclusion that the violence found in both twentieth century aesthetics and politics came about as the result of a similarly idealistic principle