116 research outputs found

    Improving statistical power of glaucoma clinical trials using an ensemble of cyclical generative adversarial networks

    Get PDF
    Albeit spectral-domain OCT (SDOCT) is now in clinical use for glaucoma management, published clinical trials relied on time-domain OCT (TDOCT) which is characterized by low signal-to-noise ratio, leading to low statistical power. For this reason, such trials require large numbers of patients observed over long intervals and become more costly. We propose a probabilistic ensemble model and a cycle-consistent perceptual loss for improving the statistical power of trials utilizing TDOCT. TDOCT are converted to synthesized SDOCT and segmented via Bayesian fusion of an ensemble of GANs. The final retinal nerve fibre layer segmentation is obtained automatically on an averaged synthesized image using label fusion. We benchmark different networks using i) GAN, ii) Wasserstein GAN (WGAN) (iii) GAN + perceptual loss and iv) WGAN + perceptual loss. For training and validation, an independent dataset is used, while testing is performed on the UK Glaucoma Treatment Study (UKGTS), i.e. a TDOCT-based trial. We quantify the statistical power of the measurements obtained with our method, as compared with those derived from the original TDOCT. The results provide new insights into the UKGTS, showing a significantly better separation between treatment arms, while improving the statistical power of TDOCT on par with visual field measurements

    Efficacy of Repeat Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Medication-Naïve Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension during the LiGHT Trial

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in medication-naïve open angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients requiring repeat treatment for early to medium-term failure during the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) trial. // DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of SLT treatment arm of a multicentre prospective randomised-controlled-trial. // PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve OAG or OHT requiring repeat 360-degree SLT within 18 months. Re-treatment was triggered by pre-defined IOP and disease-progression criteria (using objective individualised target IOPs) // METHODS: After SLT at baseline, patients were followed for a minimum of 18 months after second (‘repeat’) SLT. A mixed model analysis was performed with the eye as the unit of analysis, with crossed random-effects to adjust for correlation between fellow eyes and repeated measures within eyes. Kaplan-Meier curves plot the duration of effect. // OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial (‘early’) IOP lowering at 2-months and duration of effect following initial and Repeat SLT. // RESULTS: 115 eyes of 90 patients received Repeat SLT during first 18 months of the trial. Pre-treatment IOP prior to Initial SLT was significantly higher than that prior to pre-retreatment IOP of Repeat SLT (mean difference: 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 4.3, mmHg; p<0.001). Absolute IOP reduction at 2-months was greater following Initial, compared to Repeat, SLT (mean difference: 1.0, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.8, mmHg; p=0.02). Adjusted absolute IOP reduction at 2-months (adjusting for IOP prior to initial or repeat laser) was greater following Repeat SLT (adjusted mean difference: -1.1, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.5, mmHg; p=0.001). 34 eyes were ‘early failures’ (retreated 2-months after Initial SLT) vs 81 ‘later failures’ (retreatment beyond 2-months following Initial SLT). No significant difference in early absolute IOP reduction at 2-months following Repeat SLT was noted between ‘early’ vs ‘later’ failures’ (mean difference: 0.3, 95% CI, -1.1 to 1.8,mmHg; p=0.655). Repeat SLT maintained drop-free IOP control in 67% of 115 eyes at 18 months, with no clinically-relevant adverse events. // CONCLUSION: These exploratory analyses demonstrate Repeat SLT can maintain IOP at or below Target IOP in medication-naive OAG and OHT eyes requiring retreatment with atleast an equivalent duration of effect to initial laser

    Estimating the Distribution of True Rates of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the distribution of the true rates of progression (RoP) of visual field (VF) loss. . Methods: We analyzed the progression of mean deviation over time in series of ≥ 10 tests from 3352 eyes (one per patient) from 5 glaucoma clinics, using a novel Bayesian hierarchical Linear Mixed Model (LMM); this modeled the random-effect distribution of RoPs as the sum of 2 independent processes following, respectively, a negative exponential distribution (the "true" distribution of RoPs) and a Gaussian distribution (the "noise"), resulting in a skewed exGaussian distribution. The exGaussian-LMM was compared to a standard Gaussian-LMM using the Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC). The random-effect distributions were compared to the empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) of linear regression RoPs using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results: The WAIC indicated a better fit with the exGaussian-LMM (estimate [standard error]: 192174.4 [721.2]) than with the Gaussian-LMM (192595 [697.4], with a difference of 157.2 [22.6]). There was a significant difference between the eCDF and the Gaussian-LMM distribution (P < 0.0001), but not with the exGaussian-LMM distribution (P = 0.108). The estimated mean (95% credible intervals, CIs) "true" RoP (-0.377, 95% CI = -0.396 to -0.359 dB/year) was more negative than the observed mean RoP (-0.283, 95% CI = -0.299 to -0.268 dB/year), indicating a bias likely due to learning in standard LMMs. Conclusions: The distribution of "true" RoPs can be estimated with an exGaussian-LMM, improving model accuracy. Translational Relevance: We used these results to develop a fast and accurate analytical approximation for sample-size calculations in clinical trials using standard LMMs, which was integrated in a freely available web application
    • …
    corecore