A new prognostic algorithm based on stage of cirrhosis and HVPG to improve risk-stratification after variceal bleeding

Background & Aims: HVPG decrease ≥20% or ≤12mmHg (“responders”) indicates good prognosis during propranolol/nadolol treatment but requires two HVPG measurements. We aimed at simplifying risk‐stratification after variceal bleeding using clinical data and HVPG. Methods: 193 cirrhotic patients (62% with ascites and/or hepatic encephalopathy, HE) included within 7‐days of bleeding had HVPG measured before and at 1‐3 months of treatment with propranolol/nadolol plus endoscopic band ligation. End‐points: Rebleeding and rebleeding/transplantation‐free survival for 4‐years. Another cohort (n=231) served as validation set. Results: During follow‐up 45 patients had variceal bleeding and 61 died. HVPG‐responders (n=71) had lower rebleeding‐risk (10% vs 34%, p=0.001) and better survival than 122 non‐responders (61% vs 39%, p=0.001). Patients with/HE (n=120) had lower survival than patients without (40% vs 63%, p=0.005). Among patients with ascites/HE, those with baseline HVPG≤16mmHg (n=16) had low rebleeding‐risk (13%). By contrast, among patients with ascites/HE and baseline HVPG>16mmHg, only HVPG‐responders (n=32) had good prognosis, with lower rebleeding‐risk and better survival than non‐responders (n=72) (respective proportions: 7% vs 39%,p=0.018; 56% vs 30% p=0.010). These findings allowed developing a new algorithm for risk‐stratification in which HVPG‐response was only measured in patients with ascites and/or HE and baseline HVPG>16mmHg. This algorithm reduced the grey‐zone (high‐risk patients not dying on follow‐up) from 46% to 35% and decreased by 42% the HVPG measurements required. The validation cohort confirmed these results. Conclusion: Restricting HVPG measurements to patients with ascites/HE and measuring HVPG‐response only if baseline HVPG>16mmHg improves detection of high‐risk patients while markedly reducing the number of HVPG measurements required

Aphasia in a patient with acute hepatic encephalopathy associated with multifocal cortical brain lesions (Letter)

La encefalopatía hepática aguda (EHA) se caracteriza típicamente por una amplia gama de manifestaciones neuropsiquiátricas incluyendo alteraciones del comportamiento, estado de ánimo o cognitivas asociadas a asterixis y diferentes grados de alteración del nivel de consciencia que pueden progresar a estupor o coma en algunos casos1. Esta situación puede ser debida a una insuficiencia hepática aguda, cirrosis, hipertensión portal o la presencia de una derivación porto-sistémica2,3. La resonancia magnética (RM) cerebral en EHA puede mostrar alteraciones de se nal en diferentes áreas cerebrales debido a edema vasogénico y citotóxico relacionado con el efecto tóxico del amonio en el cerebro. Estas alteraciones pueden desaparecer después de la resolución de la encefalopatía o pueden progresar a necrosis laminar cortical en los casos con evolución desfavorable. Las presentaciones con manifestaciones focales son muy poco frecuentes en la EHA y pueden derivar en errores diagnósticos

Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (Abernethy malformation): An international observational study

Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) or Abernethy malformation is a rare condition in which splanchnic venous blood bypasses the liver draining directly into systemic circulation through a congenital shunt. Patients may develop hepatic encephalopathy (HE), pulmonary hypertension (PaHT), or liver tumors, among other complications. However, the actual incidence of such complications is unknown, mainly because of the lack of a protocolized approach to these patients. This study characterizes the clinical manifestations and outcome of a large cohort of CEPS patients with the aim of proposing a guide for their management. This is an observational, multicenter, international study. Sixty-six patients were included; median age at the end of follow-up was 30 years. Nineteen patients (28%) presented HE. Ten-, 20-, and 30-year HE incidence rates were 13%, 24%, and 28%, respectively. No clinical factors predicted HE. Twenty-five patients had benign nodular lesions. Ten patients developed adenomas (median age, 18 years), and another 8 developed HCC (median age, 39 years). Of 10 patients with dyspnea, PaHT was diagnosed in 8 and hepatopulmonary syndrome in 2. Pulmonary complications were only screened for in 19 asymptomatic patients, and PaHT was identified in 2. Six patients underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma or adenoma. Shunt closure was performed in 15 patients with improvement/stability/cure of CEPS manifestations. Conclusion: CEPS patients may develop severe complications. Screening for asymptomatic complications and close surveillance is needed. Shunt closure should be considered both as a therapeutic and prophylactic approach

Preemptive-TIPS improves outcome in high-risk variceal bleeding : An observational study

Objective Patients admitted with acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and Child Pugh C score (CP\u2010C) or Child Pugh B plus active bleeding at endoscopy (CP\u2010B+AB) are at high risk for treatment failure, rebleeding and mortality. Preemptive TIPS (p\u2010TIPS) has been shown to improve survival in these patients but its use in clinical practice has been challenged and not routinely incorporated. The present study aimed to further validate the role of preemptive TIPS in a large number of high\u2010risk patients. Design Multicenter, international, observational study including 671 patients from 34 centers admitted for AVB and high\u2010risk of treatment failure. Patients were managed according to current guidelines and use of drugs and endoscopic therapy (D+E) or preemptive TIPS (p\u2010TIPS) was based on individual center policy. Results p\u2010TIPS in the setting of AVB is associated with a lower mortality in Child C patients compared to D+E (1 year mortality 22% vs 47% in D+E group; P=0.002). Mortality rate in CP\u2010B+AB patients was low and p\u2010TIPS did not improve it. In CP\u2010C and CP\u2010B +AB patients, p\u2010TIPS reduces treatment failure and rebleeding (1 year CIF\u2010probability of remaining free of the composite endpoint: 92% vs 74% in the D+E group; P=0.017), development of \u201cde novo\u201d or worsening of previous ascites without increasing rates of hepatic encephalopathy. Conclusion p\u2010TIPS must be the treatment of choice in CP\u2010C patients with AVB. Due to the strong benefit in preventing further bleeding and ascites, p\u2010TIPS could be a good treatment strategy for CP\u2010B+AB patients

Çédille, revista de estudios franceses

Presentació

EFFECTS OF ENOXAPARIN ADMINISTRATION ON CCl4 CIRRHOTIC RATS WITH PORTAL HYPERTENSION

Portal Hypertensio

Acute propranolol administration effectively decreases portal pressure in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Background and aims: Up to 60% of patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) require angioplasty or restenting during the first year of follow up because of TIPS dysfunction (stenosis of the intrahepatic shunt increasing the portal pressure gradient above the 12 mm Hg threshold). We hypothesised that in patients with TIPS stenosis, propranolol administration, by decreasing portal inflow, would markedly decrease portal pressure. Patients and methods: Eighteen patients with TIPS dysfunction were investigated by measuring portal pressure gradient before and after acute propranolol administration (0.2 mg/kg intravenously; n=18). Results: Propranolol markedly reduced the portal pressure gradient (from 16.6 (3.5) to 11.9 (4.8) mm Hg; p16 mm Hg) (8/10 v 1/8; p=0.015). Conclusions: Propranolol therapy may delay the increase in portal pressure and reduce the need for reintervention in patients with TIPS dysfunction

Acute propranolol administration effectively decreases portal pressure in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Background and aims: Up to 60% of patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) require angioplasty or restenting during the first year of follow up because of TIPS dysfunction (stenosis of the intrahepatic shunt increasing the portal pressure gradient above the 12 mm Hg threshold). We hypothesised that in patients with TIPS stenosis, propranolol administration, by decreasing portal inflow, would markedly decrease portal pressure. Patients and methods: Eighteen patients with TIPS dysfunction were investigated by measuring portal pressure gradient before and after acute propranolol administration (0.2 mg/kg intravenously; n=18). Results: Propranolol markedly reduced the portal pressure gradient (from 16.6 (3.5) to 11.9 (4.8) mm Hg; p16 mm Hg) (8/10 v 1/8; p=0.015). Conclusions: Propranolol therapy may delay the increase in portal pressure and reduce the need for reintervention in patients with TIPS dysfunction