Use of functional feeding strategies to protect Atlantic salmon from virally-induced inflammatory diseases- mechanistic insights revealed by transcriptomic analysis

Over the past few years one of the major concerns in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) farming industry has been the increasing incidence and severity of inflammatory viral diseases. Heart and skeletal muscle inflammation (HSMI) and cardiomyopathy syndrome (CMS) are currently two of the most prevalent viral diseases in commercial Atlantic salmon farms in Norway. Mortality levels in both diseases are generally low but morbidity can be very high with the associated chronic inflammatory response lasting for several months. The consequent reduced growth performance is causing considerable financial impact as HSMI has become increasingly widespread in recent years. The impact of CMS is further exacerbated as it generally affects large fish close to harvest. HSMI lesions occur in the atrium and ventricle in the heart including inflammation and necrosis in epi- endo- and myocardium along with myositis of red skeletal muscle. CMS lesions are commonly observed in the spongy myocardium in the atrium and ventricle of the heart with severe mononuclear inflammation and necrosis. Furthermore, circulatory disturbances associated with reduced cardiac function cause multifocal liver steatosis and necrosis in both diseases. Currently there are no vaccines or any other effective treatments for these diseases and so alternative therapies that could potentially modulate the intensity of the inflammatory response could be crucial to improve the clinical manifestation of the diseases. Therefore, the overall aim of the present study was to evaluate the concept of “clinical nutrition” to improve the clinical symptoms of both viral diseases, HSMI and CMS, through the use of functional feeds formulated with reduced lipid content and increased proportions of anti-inflammatory fatty acids to moderate the apparently uncontrolled inflammatory response in the heart tissue associated with both diseases and also alleviate the secondary hepatic lesions. The experimental work consisted of three major dietary trials in Atlantic salmon in seawater. Two large trials investigated the effects of functional feeds in Atlantic salmon challenged with Atlantic salmon piscine reovirus (ASRV) and piscine myocarditis virus (PMCV), the causal agents of HSMI and CMS, respectively. In both trials, heart transcriptome, heart and liver histopathology and tissue lipid and fatty acid compositions and metabolism were determined post-infection in fish fed with the functional feeds in comparison with fish fed with a standard commercial feed formulation considered as a reference diet. All the functional feeds were formulated to have reduced digestible energy through lower dietary lipid and higher protein contents, and increased levels and proportions of anti-inflammatory long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA), particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) compared with the reference diets. Histopathology, fatty acid composition and gene expression of heart were assessed over a long time-period of 16 weeks and 14 weeks post-challenge with ASRV and PMCV, respectively. Viral load in heart tissue, hepatic histopathology and fatty acid composition of liver and head kidney along with expression of the genes involved in the eicosanoid and LC-PUFA and eicosanoid biosynthesis pathways were also determined in the HSMI trial. The third trial was a nutritional trial evaluating the effects of dietary digestible energy content on lipid and fatty acid metabolism in salmon fed diets containing graded amounts of lipid. Fatty acid composition of liver and heart were assessed over 12 weeks, along with the hepatic expression of genes of lipid and fatty acid metabolism. The results of this research are presented in four chapters (Chapters 2-5) as four paper manuscripts. The manuscripts/Papers are either published (Chapter 2), in review (Chapter 3 and 4) or drafted for submission (Chapter 5) in appropriate peer-reviewed international journals. Chapter 2 and 3 correspond to the HSMI trial, Chapter 4 to the nutritional trial, and Chapter 5 to the CMS trial. Chapter 2 showed that viral load and histopathology scores were lower in fish fed the functional feeds, especially diet FF1, which displayed better performance. Diet strongly influenced the expression of genes related with the immune and inflammatory responses, with delayed expression in fish fed the functional feeds. Up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes was correlated with the higher viral load observed at early-mid stages of the disease in fish fed the reference diet (ST). Expression of genes related with the immune response at 16-weeks post challenge reflected the differences in immunomodulation between the functional feeds, with fish fed diet FF1 showing lower expression. Therefore, severity of the heart lesions was correlated with the intensity of the immune response and could be associated with tissue anti-inflammatory LC-PUFA levels. Chapter 3 was focused on liver histopathology, fatty acid composition and LC-PUFA biosynthesis, along with phospholipid fatty acid composition and eicosanoid production in head kidney and heart tissue at early and late stages of ASRV infection. Liver was severely affected by the virus at the beginning of the infection in fish fed the reference ST diet, but the level of lesions were similar in all dietary groups at the end of the trial. Hepatic expression of fatty acyl desaturases was significantly depressed in fish fed the ST diet compare with fish fed the functional feeds despite the lower levels of dietary LC-PUFA in that feed. Thus endogenous production and bioavailability of anti-inflammatory LC-PUFA was potentially enhanced in fish fed the functional feeds. Changes in tissue lipid content, mobilization of fatty acids involved in inflammatory responses and changes in expression of transcription factors and genes involved in eicosanoid biosynthesis were more prominent in head kidney, confirming the important role of this organ in dietary immunomodulation after viral infection. To a lesser extent similar changes were observed in heart tissue, suggesting in situ production of eicosanoids could also be important. The unexpected effects of diet on expression of genes of LC-PUFA biosynthesis were specifically investigated in the trial described in Chapter 4. One aim of this study was to clarify whether dietary lipid content or viral infection was the cause of altered expression of desaturase genes between the different diets. Hepatic expression of other genes of lipid and fatty acid metabolism were also determined to evaluate metabolic changes associated with dietary lipid/energy level. In general, reduction of dietary energy and lipid contents while maintaining similar proportions of dietary fatty acids, led to a general up-regulation of genes involved in lipid biosynthetic pathways. Thus salmon fed lower energy diet showed increased liver expression of fatty acyl desaturases in comparison with fish fed higher energy levels. Heart transcriptomic data in Chapter 5 showed a similar delay in the inflammatory response in fish fed the functional feeds after PCMV infection as observed in the HSMI study. Modulation of inflammatory responses, similar to that previously described after ASRV infection, was also observed in fish fed the functional feeds. However, the differences in the expression of immune related genes and the level of heart lesions were not as prominent at mid-late stages of the disease as in fish fed FF1 in the HSMI trial. The present study demonstrated the beneficial effects of a clinical nutrition approach via functional feeds in two viral inflammatory diseases, HSMI and CMS, currently affecting farmed Atlantic salmon. Dietary immunomodulation increased the availability of anti-inflammatory LC-PUFA and significantly influenced the expression of the genes related with the immune/inflammatory response reducing the level and severity of cardiac and liver lesions and therefore improving the performance of fish suffering the diseases

Addressing climate change with behavioral science:A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.</p

Addressing climate change with behavioral science:A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.</p

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors

Phylogenetic Diversity of Plant Metacommunity of the Dnieper River Arena Terrace Within the ‘Dnieper-Orilskiy ’ Nature Reserve

This article presents the features of the phylogenetic organization of the plant communities of the Dnieper River terrace within the ‘Dnieper-Orilskiy’ Nature Reserve and the patterns of its spatial variation involving remote sensing data of the Earth’s surface. The research materials were collected in the period 2012−2016 from within the nature reserve. The research polygon is within the first terrace (arena) of the Dnieper valley. Sandy steppe, meadow, forest and marsh communities within the Protoch river floodplain and the Orlova ravine, as well as artificial pine plantations were the habitats present within the research polygon. The vegetation description was carried out on 10×10 m (100 m2) plots. A total of 94 geobotanical descriptions were made. Data on plant phylogeny was obtained by the Phylomatic service. Phylogenetic diversity of the communities was assessed by the Faith, Simpson and Shannon indices. Phylogenetic analysis was performed by means of a double principal coordinate analysis (DPCoA). The vegetation cover within the investigated polygon was represented by 189 species. Abundance Phylogenetic Deviation (APD) for the investigated metacommunity was evaluated to −0.53, which is statistically significantly different from random alternatives (p = 0.001). The APD negative value indicates that phylogenetic organization of the investigated metacommunity is overdispersed. The permutation procedure allowed us to establish that the eigenvalues of the DPCoA-axes obtained as a result of the real phylogenetic tree were significantly higher than their own number for the random phylogenetic trees for the first seven axes. This indicates that the first seven axes are useful for additional information on the ordination structure of the metacommunity

Addressing climate change with behavioral science::A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

International audienceEffectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions’ effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior—several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people’s initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to motivate people to change their climate beliefs and behaviors. Here, we tested 11 expert-crowdsourced interventions on four climate mitigation outcomes: beliefs, policy support, information sharing intention, and an effortful tree-planting behavioral task. Across 59,440 participants from 63 countries, the interventions' effectiveness was small, largely limited to nonclimate skeptics, and differed across outcomes: Beliefs were strengthened mostly by decreasing psychological distance (by 2.3%), policy support by writing a letter to a future-generation member (2.6%), information sharing by negative emotion induction (12.1%), and no intervention increased the more effortful behavior-several interventions even reduced tree planting. Last, the effects of each intervention differed depending on people's initial climate beliefs. These findings suggest that the impact of behavioral climate interventions varies across audiences and target behaviors.</p