14 research outputs found

    Phylogenomics of DNA topoisomerases: their origin and putative roles in the emergence of modern organisms.

    Get PDF
    International audienceTopoisomerases are essential enzymes that solve topological problems arising from the double-helical structure of DNA. As a consequence, one should have naively expected to find homologous topoisomerases in all cellular organisms, dating back to their last common ancestor. However, as observed for other enzymes working with DNA, this is not the case. Phylogenomics analyses indicate that different sets of topoisomerases were present in the most recent common ancestors of each of the three cellular domains of life (some of them being common to two or three domains), whereas other topoisomerases families or subfamilies were acquired in a particular domain, or even a particular lineage, by horizontal gene transfers. Interestingly, two groups of viruses encode topoisomerases that are only distantly related to their cellular counterparts. To explain these observations, we suggest that topoisomerases originated in an ancestral virosphere, and that various subfamilies were later on transferred independently to different ancient cellular lineages. We also proposed that topoisomerases have played a critical role in the origin of modern genomes and in the emergence of the three cellular domains

    Origin and evolution of DNA topoisomerases.

    No full text
    The DNA topoisomerases are essential for DNA replication, transcription, recombination, as well as for chromosome compaction and segregation. They may have appeared early during the formation of the modern DNA world. Several families and subfamilies of the two types of DNA topoisomerases (I and II) have been described in the three cellular domains of life (Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya), as well as in viruses infecting eukaryotes or bacteria. The main families of DNA topoisomerases, Topo IA, Topo IB, Topo IC (Topo V), Topo IIA and Topo IIB (Topo VI) are not homologous, indicating that they originated independently. However, some of them share homologous modules or subunits that were probably recruited independently to produce different topoisomerase activities. The puzzling phylogenetic distribution of the various DNA topoisomerase families and subfamilies cannot be easily reconciled with the classical models of early evolution describing the relationships between the three cellular domains. A possible scenario is based on a Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) with a RNA genome (i.e. without the need for DNA topoisomerases). Different families of DNA topoisomerases (some of them possibly of viral origin) would then have been independently introduced in the different cellular domains. We review here the main characteristics of the different families and subfamilies of DNA topoisomerases in a historical and evolutionary perspective, with the hope to stimulate further works and discussions on the origin and evolution of these fascinating enzymes

    Lokiarchaea are close relatives of Euryarchaeota, not bridging the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes

    No full text
    International audienceThe eocyte hypothesis, in which Eukarya emerged from within Archaea, has been boosted by the description of a new candidate archaeal phylum, “Lokiarchaeota”, from metagenomic data. Eukarya branch within Lokiarchaeota in a tree reconstructed from the concatenation of 36 universal proteins. However, individual phylogenies revealed that lokiarchaeal proteins sequences have different evolutionary histories. The individual markers phylogenies revealed at least two subsets of proteins, either supporting the Woese or the Eocyte tree of life. Strikingly, removal of a single protein, the elongation factor EF2, is sufficient to break the Eukaryotes-Lokiarchaea affiliation. Our analysis suggests that the three lokiarchaeal EF2 proteins have a chimeric organization that could be due to contamination and/or homologous recombination with patches of eukaryotic sequences. A robust phylogenetic analysis of RNA polymerases with a new dataset indicates that Lokiarchaeota and related phyla of the Asgard superphylum are sister group to Euryarchaeota, not to Eukarya, and supports the monophyly of Archaea with their rooting in the branch leading to Thaumarchaeota. © 2017 Da Cunha et al

    Expanding the type IIB DNA topoisomerase family: identification of new topoisomerase and topoisomerase-like proteins in mobile genetic elements

    No full text
    International audienceThe control of DNA topology by DNA topoisomerases is essential for virtually all DNA transactions in the cell. These enzymes, present in every organism, exist as several non-homologous families. We previously identified a small group of atypical type IIB topoiso-merases, called Topo VIII, mainly encoded by plas-mids. Here, taking advantage of the rapid expansion of sequence databases, we identified new putative Topo VIII homologs. Our analyses confirm the exclu-sivity of the corresponding genes to mobile genetic elements (MGE) and extend their distribution to nine different bacterial phyla and one archaeal superphy-lum. Notably, we discovered another subfamily of topoisomerases, dubbed 'Mini-A', including distant homologs of type IIB topoisomerases and encoded by extrachromosomal and integrated bacterial and archaeal viruses. Interestingly, a short, functionally uncharacterized motif at the C-terminal extremity of type IIB topoisomerases appears sufficient to discriminate between Mini-A, Topo VI and Topo VIII sub-families. This motif could be a key element for understanding the differences between the three sub-families. Collectively, this work leads to an updated model for the origin and evolution of the type IIB topoisomerase family and raises questions regarding the role of topoisomerases during replication of MGE in bacteria and archaea

    Crystal structure of an intact type II DNA topoisomerase: insights into DNA transfer mechanisms.

    No full text
    DNA topoisomerases resolve DNA topological problems created during transcription, replication, and recombination. These ubiquitous enzymes are essential for cell viability and are highly potent targets for the development of antibacterial and antitumoral drugs. Type II enzymes catalyze the transfer of a DNA duplex through another one in an ATP-dependent mechanism. Because of its small size and sensitivity to antitumoral drugs, the archaeal DNA topoisomerase VI, a type II enzyme, is an excellent model for gaining further understanding of the organization and mechanism of these enzymes. We present the crystal structure of intact DNA topoisomerase VI bound to radicicol, an inhibitor of human topo II, and compare it to the conformation of the apo-protein as determined by small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. This structure, combined with a wealth of experimental data gathered on these enzymes, allows us to propose a structural model for the two-gate DNA transfer mechanism

    Topoisomerase I (TOP1) dynamics: conformational transition from open to closed states

    No full text
    Eukaryotic topoisomerases I (TOP1) are ubiquitous enzymes removing DNA torsional stress. However, there is little data concerning the three-dimensional structure of TOP1 in the absence of DNA, nor how the DNA molecule can enter/exit its closed conformation. Here, we solved the structure of thermostable archaeal Caldiarchaeum subterraneum CsTOP1 in an apo-form. The enzyme displays an open conformation resulting from one substantial rotation between the capping (CAP) and the catalytic (CAT) modules. The junction between these two modules is a five-residue loop, the hinge, whose flexibility permits the opening/closing of the enzyme and the entry of DNA. We identified a highly conserved tyrosine near the hinge as mediating the transition from the open to closed conformation upon DNA binding. Directed mutagenesis confirmed the importance of the hinge flexibility, and linked the enzyme dynamics with sensitivity to camptothecin, a TOP1 inhibitor targeting the TOP1 enzyme catalytic site in the closed conformatio

    Dimer formation.

    No full text
    <p>Supercoiled (SC) plasmids pUC18 and pJO322 carrying the Leu2-88 fragment (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006847#pgen.1006847.s008" target="_blank">S5A Fig</a>) were incubated with Int<sup>pTN3</sup> in a standard reaction (see <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006847#sec014" target="_blank">Materials and methods</a>) and compared with linearized pJO322 by agarose gel electrophoresis. The integrase has no effect on pUC18 with the exception of the production of a faint linear species (indicated by an arrow). The integrase increases considerably the formation of plasmid pJO322 dimers and to a lower extent that of multimers. No increase in the formation of open circular (OC) form was observed.</p

    An archaeal orthologue of the universal protein Kae1 is an iron metalloprotein which exhibits atypical DNA-binding properties and apurinic-endonuclease activity in vitro.

    Get PDF
    The Kae1 (Kinase-associated endopeptidase 1) protein is a member of the recently identified transcription complex EKC and telomeres maintenance complex KEOPS in yeast. Kae1 homologues are encoded by all sequenced genomes in the three domains of life. Although annotated as putative endopeptidases, the actual functions of these universal proteins are unknown. Here we show that the purified Kae1 protein (Pa-Kae1) from Pyrococcus abyssi is an iron-protein with a novel type of ATP-binding site. Surprisingly, this protein did not exhibit endopeptidase activity in vitro but binds cooperatively to single and double-stranded DNA and induces unusual DNA conformational change. Furthermore, Pa-Kae1 exhibits a class I apurinic (AP)-endonuclease activity (AP-lyase). Both DNA binding and AP-endonuclease activity are inhibited by ATP. Kae1 is thus a novel and atypical universal DNA interacting protein whose importance could rival those of RecA (RadA/Rad51) in the maintenance of genome integrity in all living cells
    corecore