Postdischarge assessment after a heart failure hospitalization: the next step forward.

Heart failure (HF) is the most frequent cause of hospitalization for patients >65 years of age. Mortality during the initial hospitalization ranges from 6% to 7% in Europe to 3% to 4% in the United States, depending on the length of hospital stay. Poor outcomes have universally been shown after discharge, with 60- to 90-day mortality rates of 5% to 15% and hospital readmission rates of 30%. Whereas the prognosis of patients with chronic HF has improved in recent years, there has been no change in the high risk of death or rehospitalization after an HF hospitalization. In addition to the lack of new therapies, incomplete relief from fluid overload, insufficient patient education, lack of implementation of evidence-based therapies, and poor postdischarge follow-up planning are among the main causes of these poor outcomes. A better assessment of the patient at the time of discharge and in the following weeks seems therefore as mandatory. This article outlines the main components of such a program. These include the personnel who should be involved, i.e. HF specialists and cardiologists versus non-specialists, the variables which should be assessed, i.e. those related with congestion and fluid overload, the times when they should be assessed, as the phase at highest risk is immediately after discharge from hospital, and, finally, the aims of such programs. We retain that an improvement of post-discharge follow-up will be able to significantly improve patients’ outcomes with a rate of success comparable, if not greater, to that which can be achieved by new therapies

Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of patients with congestive heart failure

All methods for estimating the severity of heart failure, such as clinical and radiographic examination, measures of ventricular performance, and exercise capacity, when used independently, have major limitations. Echocardiography can be used, not only to assess left-ventricular ejection fraction but also other determinants of prognosis (i.e., left-ventricular size and shape, estimation of left atrial and pulmonary artery pressures, right side involvement). The availability of continuous-wave Doppler has permitted us to evaluate pulmonary artery systolic pressure from tricuspid regurgitation, and this contributes to additional powerful data. In long-standing heart failure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure is a predictor of survival, and aggressive therapy to reduce wedge pressure improves survival. Noninvasive estimation of left-atrial pressure and left-ventricular filling pressure have been attempted by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography in patients with heart failure and mitral regurgitation and by tissue Doppler imaging at the mitral annulus level. A significant relation has been reported between profiles of pulmonary venous flow and left-atrial pressure, but pulmonary venous flow indexes can be better assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in terms of detection rate. It has recently been recognized that TEE can provide valuable information on intracardiac hemodynamics and ventricular function. Two-dimensional evaluation of ventricular function and pulsed- and continuous-wave Doppler recordings from the pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, and mitral inflow are combined to provide these data, which are both qualitative and quantitative, and permit estimation of ventricular ejection fraction, left-atrial pressure, and cardiac output. It would be important to be able to stratify patients with congestive heart failure according to groups with the highest risk for early death because heart transplantation or aggressive medical treatment could be specifically applied to this population. Serial echocardiographic evaluations of the classic variables of systolic left-ventricular function as well as Doppler transmitral flow may be useful in monitoring the progression of the disease and the effects of medical treatment. The degree of pulmonary hypertension is independently associated with the restrictive left-ventricular diastolic filling pattern and with the degree of functional mitral regurgitation. Future studies on the impact of these hemodynamic variables on the outcome of patients with left-ventricular dysfunction are desirable

Incremental Reduction in Risk of Death Associated with Use of Guideline-Recommended Therapies in Patients with Heart Failure: A Nested Case-Control Analysis of IMPROVE HF

Background: Several therapies are guideline-recommended to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but the incremental clinical effectiveness of these therapies has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the individual and incremental benefits of guideline-recommended HF therapies associated with 24-month survival. Methods and results: We performed a nested case-control study of HF patients enrolled in IMPROVE HF. Cases were patients who died within 24 months and controls were patients who survived to 24 months, propensity-matched 1:2 for multiple prognostic variables. Logistic regression was performed, and the attributable mortality risk from incomplete application of each evidence-based therapy among eligible patients was calculated. A total of 1376 cases and 2752 matched controls were identified. β-Blocker and cardiac resynchronization therapy were associated with the greatest 24-month survival benefit (adjusted odds ratio for death 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–0.52; and 0.44, 95% CI, 0.29–0.67, respectively). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, and HF education were also associated with benefit, whereas aldosterone antagonist use was not. Incremental benefits were observed with each successive therapy, plateauing once any 4 to 5 therapies were provided (adjusted odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI, 0.23–0.42 for 5 or more versus 0/1, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Individual, with a single exception, and incremental use of guideline-recommended therapies was associated with survival benefit, with a potential plateau at 4 to 5 therapies. These data provide further rationale to implement guideline-recommended HF therapies in the absence of contraindications to patients with HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Water and Sodium in Heart Failure: A Spotlight on Congestion.

Despite all available therapies, the rates of hospitalization and death from heart failure (HF) remain unacceptably high. The most common reasons for hospital admission are symptoms related to congestion. During hospitalization, most patients respond well to standard therapy and are discharged with significantly improved symptoms. Post-discharge, many patients receive diligent and frequent follow-up. However, rehospitalization rates remain high. One potential explanation is a persistent failure by clinicians to adequately manage congestion in the outpatient setting. The failure to successfully manage these patients post-discharge may represent an unmet need to improve the way congestion is both recognized and treated. A primary aim of future HF management may be to improve clinical surveillance to prevent and manage chronic fluid overload while simultaneously maximizing the use of evidence-based therapies with proven long-term benefit. Improvement in cardiac function is the ultimate goal and maintenance of a ‘‘dry’’ clinical profile is important to prevent hospital admission and improve prognosis. This paper focuses on methods for monitoring congestion, and strategies for water and sodium management in the context of the complex interplay between the cardiac and renal systems. A rationale for improving recognition and treatment of congestion is also proposed

Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology and endorsed by the European society of intensive care medicine

Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) require urgent in-hospital treatment for relief of symptoms. The main reason for hospitalization is congestion, rather than low cardiac output. Although congestion is associated with a poor prognosis, many patients are discharged with persistent signs and symptoms of congestion and/or a high left ventricular filling pressure. Available data suggest that a pre-discharge clinical assessment of congestion is often not performed, and even when it is performed, it is not done systematically because no method to assess congestion prior to discharge has been validated. Grading congestion would be helpful for initiating and following response to therapy. We have reviewed a variety of strategies to assess congestion which should be considered in the care of patients admitted with HF. We propose a combination of available measurements of congestion. Key elements in the measurement of congestion include bedside assessment, laboratory analysis, and dynamic manoeuvres. These strategies expand by suggesting a routine assessment of congestion and a pre-discharge scoring system. A point system is used to quantify the degree of congestion. This score offers a new instrument to direct both current and investigational therapies designed to optimize volume status during and after hospitalization. In conclusion, this document reviews the available methods of evaluating congestion, provides suggestions on how to properly perform these measurements, and proposes a method to quantify the amount of congestion presen

455 Length of stay for heart failure hospitalization in the eplerenone post‐acute myocardial infarction heart failure efficacy and survival study (EPHESUS)

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106768/1/ehfs90327-x.pd

Hyponatremia in acute heart failure syndromes: a potential therapeutic target

Mild hyponatremia is common in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure, and it is a major predictor of post-discharge mortality and morbidity irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent data also suggest that standard therapy for heart failure does not improve or normalize serum sodium concentration during hospitalization. There are conclusive data that vasopressin antagonists improve or normalize serum sodium in this patient population. However, it is not known if this improvement or normalization in serum sodium is associated with an improvement in post-discharge outcomes. Future trials with vasopressin antagonists in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure and hyponatremia are in order

Overview of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure resulting in hospitalization.

Patients with worsening heart failure (HF) requiring hospitalization commonly have a history of progressive fluid retention, decreased renal function, and hyponatremia. For these patients, diuretics have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment, but they are associated with electrolyte abnormalities and impaired renal function. Previous studies have shown that levels of the endogenous arginine vasopressin (AVP) hormone are elevated in patients with HF and may be the contributing factor to fluid retention and hyponatremia, and probably progression of HF. Vasopressin antagonists represent a unique class of therapeutic agents because of their potential role in both the short- and long-term treatment of patients hospitalized with worsening HF. As "aquaretics," AVP antagonists offer the possibility of added efficacy in relieving congestion and improving symptoms with minimal adverse effects in combination with standard medical therapy. Some AVP receptor antagonists have shown promising results in animal studies and small-scale clinical trials. The purpose of this review was to update the current status of studies with the available AVP antagonists

Erratum to: Epidemiology and outcome of the cardio-renal syndrome

n/