A collimation system for ELI-NP Gamma Beam System - design and simulation of performance

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and refine the design of the collimation system for the gamma radiation source (GBS) currently being realised at ELI-NP facility. The gamma beam, produced by inverse Compton scattering, will provide a tunable average energy in the range between 0.2 and 20 MeV, an energy bandwidth 0.5% and a flux of about 108 photons/s. As a result of the inverse Compton interaction, the energy of the emitted radiation is related to the emission angle, it is maximum in the backscattering direction and decreases as the angle increase [1,2]. Therefore, the required energy bandwidth can be obtained only by developing a specific collimation system of the gamma beam, i.e. filtering out the radiation emitted at larger angles. The angular acceptance of the collimation for ELI-NP-GBS must be continuously adjustable in a range from about 700 to 60 μrad, to obtain the required parameters in the entire energy range. The solution identified is a stack of adjustable slits, arranged with a relative rotation around the beam axis to obtain an hole with an approximately circular shape. In this contribution, the final collimation design and its performance evaluated by carrying out a series of detailed Geant4 simulations both of the high-energy and the low-energy beamline are presented

Gamma beam collimation and characterization system for ELI-NP-GBS

ELI-NP-GBS is a gamma source based on inverse Compton interaction that will provide photons with tunable average energy ranging from 0.2 to 19.5 MeV, energy bandwidth down to 0.5% and average flux of about 108 photons/s in ultra-short pulses. Given these challenging characteristics, dedicated devices and techniques were developed to measure and monitor the gamma beam parameters during the commissioning and the operational phase. Futhermore an adjustable collimation system was developed to fulfill the beam monochromaticity requirement. The gamma beam characterization and collimation apparatus, currently assembled and under test at INFN-Ferrara laboratories, is described in this work

Correction: Near-infrared emitting single squaraine dye aggregates with large Stokes shifts

Correction for 'Near-infrared emitting single squaraine dye aggregates with large Stokes shifts' by G. M. Paternò et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 7732–7738

Collimation and characterization of ELI-NP gamma beam

The ELI-NP facility, currently being built in Bucharest, Romania, will deliver an intense and almost monochromatic gamma beam with tunable energy between 0.2 and 20 MeV. The challenging energy bandwidth of [Formula: see text]0.5% will be adjusted through the collimation system, while the main beam parameters will be measured through a devoted gamma-beam characterization system.[Formula: see text] The gamma-beam characterization system, designed by the EuroGammaS collaboration, consists of four elements: a Compton spectrometer that measures the gamma energy spectrum; a sampling calorimeter for a fast combined measurement of the beam average energy and its intensity, which will be used also as a monitor during machine commissioning and development; a nuclear resonant scattering system for absolute energy inter-calibration of the other detectors; and a gamma beam profile imager to be used for alignment and diagnostics purposes. The collimation and characterization system will be presented in this article. These systems have already been built and tested, while the delivery at ELI-NP facility and the final commissioning is scheduled by Fall 2018

Dual Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Lasing from Nanographene Films

Chemically synthesized zigzag-edged nanographenes (NG) have recently demonstrated great success as the active laser units in solution-processed organic distributed feedback (DFB) lasers. Here, we report the first observation of dual amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from a large-size NG derivative (with 12 benzenoid rings) dispersed in a polystyrene film. ASE is observed simultaneously at the 685 and 739 nm wavelengths, which correspond to different transitions of the photoluminescence spectrum. Ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy has been used to ascertain the underlying photophysical processes taking place in the films. DFB lasers, based on these materials and top-layer nanostructured polymeric resonators (i.e., one or two-dimensional surface relief gratings), have been fabricated and characterized. Lasers emitting close to either one of the two possible ASE wavelengths, or simultaneously at both of them, have been prepared by proper selection of the resonator parameters.The Alicante team was funded by Spanish Government (MINECO) and European Community (FEDER), grant number MAT2015-66586-R. The researcher R.M-M was funded by a MINECO FPI fellowship (No. BES-2016-077681). The Singapore team was funded by the NRF Investigatorship programme (NRF-NRFI05-2019-0005). The Milan team has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 816313). G.M.P. acknowledges funding from Fondazione Cariplo, grant No. 2018-0979. C.D. and S.S. acknowledge funding from ERC Starting Grant SOLENALGAE (No. 679814)

Synthesis of Zigzag- and Fjord-Edged Nanographene with Dual Amplified Spontaneous Emission

We report the synthesis of a dibenzodinaphthocoronene (DBDNC) derivative as a novel nanographene with armchair, zigzag, and fjord edges, which was characterized by NMR and X-ray crystallography as well as infrared (IR) and Raman spectroscopies. Ultrafast transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy revealed the presence of stimulated emission signals at 655 nm and 710 nm with a relatively long lifetime, which resulted in dual amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) bands under ns-pulsed excitation, indicating the promise of DBNDC as a near-infrared (NIR) fluorophore for photonics. Our results provide new insight into the design of nanographene with intriguing optical properties by incorporating fjord edges.This work was financially supported by the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), the Max Planck Society, JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP19K24686, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program under grant agreement no. 101017821 (LIGHT-CAP). G. M. P thanks Fondazione Cariplo (Grant no. 2018-0979) for financial support. Researchers from the University of Alicante acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and the European Union (Next Generation EU) through grant no. PID2020-119124RB-I00; and to the Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades y Sociedad Digital de la Comunidad Valenciana (Grant No. AICO/2021/093)

Personalization for unobtrusive service interaction

Increasingly, mobile devices play a key role in the communication between users and the services embedded in their environment. With ever greater number of services added to our surroundings, there is a need to personalize services according to the user needs and environmental context avoiding service behavior from becoming overwhelming. In order to prevent this information overload, we present a method for the development of mobile services that can be personalized in terms of obtrusiveness (the degree in which each service intrudes the user's mind) according to the user needs and preferences. That is, services can be developed to provide their functionality at different obtrusiveness levels depending on the user by minimizing the duplication of efforts. On the one hand, we provide mechanisms for describing the obtrusiveness degree required for a service. On the other hand, we make use of Feature Modeling techniques in order to define the obtrusiveness level adaptation in a declarative manner. An experiment was conducted in order to put in practice the proposal and evaluate the user acceptance for the personalization capabilities provided by our approach. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011.This work has been developed with the support of MICINN under the project EVERYWARE TIN2010-18011 and co-financed with ERDF, in the grants program FPU.Gil Pascual, M.; Giner Blasco, P.; Pelechano Ferragud, V. (2012). Personalization for unobtrusive service interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 16(5):543-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0414-0S543561165Abrams M, Phanouriou C, Batongbacal AL, Williams SM, Shuster JE (1999) Uiml: an appliance-independent xml user interface language. In: WWW ’99. Elsevier, North-Holland, pp 1695–1708Ballagas R, Borchers J, Rohs M, Sheridan JG (2006) The smart phone: a ubiquitous input device. IEEE Pervas Comput 5(1):70Balme L, Demeure A, Barralon N, Coutaz J, Calvary G (2004) Cameleon-rt: a software architecture reference model for distributed, migratable, and plastic user interfaces. In: EUSAI, pp 291–302Benavides D, Cortés RA, Trinidad P (2005) Automated reasoning on feature models. In: LNCS, advanced information systems engineering: 17th international conference, CAiSE 2005 3520, pp 491–503Blomquist A, Arvola M (2002) Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI ’02. ACM, New York, NY, pp 197–200Bright A, Kay J, Ler D, Ngo K, Niu W, Nuguid A (2005) Adaptively recommending museum tours. In: Nick Ryan Tullio Salmon Cinotti GR (ed) Proceedings of workshop on smart environments and their applications to cultural heritage. Archaeolingua, pp 29–32Brown DM (2010) Communicating design: developing web site documentation for design and planning, 2nd edn. New Riders Press, USACalvary G, Coutaz J, Thevenin D, Limbourg Q, Bouillon L, Vanderdonckt J (2003) A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact Comput 15(3):289–308Cetina C, Giner P, Fons J, Pelechano V (2009) Autonomic computing through reuse of variability models at runtime: the case of smart homes. Computer 42(10):37–43Chatfield C, Carmichael D, Hexel R, Kay J, Kummerfeld B (2005) Personalisation in intelligent environments: managing the information flow. In: OZCHI ’05. Computer-human interaction special interest group of Australia, pp 1–10Clerckx T, Winters F, Coninx K (2005) Tool support for designing context-sensitive user interfaces using a model-based approach. In: TAMODIA ’05: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Task models and diagrams. ACM Press, New York, pp 11–18Czarnecki K, Helsen S, Eisenecker U (2004) Staged configuration using feature models. In: Proceedings of SPLCDuarte C, Carriço L (2006) A conceptual framework for developing adaptive multimodal applications. In: Proceedings of IUI ’06. ACM, New York, pp 132–139Evans (2003) Domain-driven design: tacking complexity In the heart of software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., BostonsFavre JM (2004) Foundations of model (Driven) (Reverse) engineering: models—Episode I: stories of the fidus papyrus and of the solarus. In: Bezivin J, Heckel R (eds) Language engineering for model-driven software development, no. 04101, Dagstuhl seminar proceedings. Dagstuhl, GermanyFischer G (2001) User modeling in human–computer interaction. User Model User-Adap Inter 11(1–2):65–86Gibbs WW (2005) Considerate computing. Scientific American 292(1):54–61Giner P, Cetina C, Fons J, Pelechano V (2010) Developing mobile workflow support in the internet of things. IEEE Pervas Comput 9(2):18–26Giner P, Cetina C, Fons J, Pelechano V (2011) Implicit interaction design for pervasive workflows. Pers Ubiquit Comput 1–10Gulliksen J, Goransson B, Boivie I, Blomkvist S, Persson J, Cajander A (2003) Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav Inform Technol 22:397–409Hinckley K, Horvitz E (2001) Toward more sensitive mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the UIST ’01. ACM, New York, pp 191–192Ho J, Intille SS (2005) Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of CHI ’05. ACM, New York, pp 909–918Horvitz E, Kadie C, Paek T, Hovel D (2003) Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications. Commun ACM 46(3):52–59Ju W, Leifer L (2008) The design of implicit interactions: making interactive systems less obnoxious. Des Issues 24(3):72–84Lewis JR (1995) Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 7(1):57–78Limbourg Q, Vanderdonckt J, Michotte B, Bouillon L, López-Jaquero V (2004) Usixml: a language supporting multi-path development of user interfaces. In: EHCI/DS-VIS, pp 200–220Mao JY, Vredenburg K, Smith PW, Carey T (2001) User-centered design methods in practice: a survey of the state of the art. In: CASCON ’01. IBM Press, New York, p 12McCrickard DS, Chewar CM (2003) Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Commun ACM 46:67–72Mori G, Paternò F, Santoro C (2002) Ctte: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 28(8):797–813Mori G, Paternò F, Santoro C (2004) Design and development of multidevice user interfaces through multiple logical descriptions. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 30(8):507–520Myers B, Hudson SE, Pausch R (2000) Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 7(1):3–28OMG (2006) Business process modeling notation (BPMN) specification. OMG Final Adopted SpecificationPaternò F, Santoro C (2003) A unified method for designing interactive systems adaptable to mobile and stationary platforms. Interact Comput 15(3):349–366Puerta A, Eisenstein J (2002) Ximl: a common representation for interaction data. In: Proceedings of IUI ’02. ACM, New York, pp 214–215Ramchurn SD, Deitch B, Thompson MK, Roure DCD, Jennings NR, Luck M (2004) Minimising intrusiveness in pervasive computing environments using multi-agent negotiation. In: First international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems, pp 364–372Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I, Booch G (1998) The unified modeling language reference manual. Addison-Wesley, LondonSchobbens PY, Heymans P, Trigaux JC, Bontemps Y (2007) Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Comput Networks 51(2):456–479Serral E, Pérez F, Valderas P, Pelechano V (2010) An end-user tool for adapting smart environment automation to user behaviour at runtime. In: Proceedings of UCAmI ’10Streefkerk JW, van Esch-Bussemakers MP, Neerincx MA (2006) Designing personal attentive user interfaces in the mobile public safety domain. Comput Hum Behav 22:749–770Tedre M (2008) What should be automated? Interactions 15(5):47–49Unger R, Chandler C (2009) A project guide to UX design: for user experience designers in the field or in the making. New Riders Publishing, Thousand OaksVan den Bergh J, Coninx K. Using uml 2.0 and profiles for modelling context-sensitive user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the MDDAUI2005 CEUR workshopVastenburg MH, Keyson DV, de Ridder H (2008) Considerate home notification systems: a field study of acceptability of notifications in the home. Pers Ubiquit Comput 12(8):555–566Vertegaal R (2003) Attentive user interfaces. Commun ACM 46(3):30–33Weiser M, Brown JS (1997) The coming age of calm technology, pp 75–85Weld DS, Anderson C, Domingos P, Etzioni O, Gajos K, Lau T, Wolf S (2003) Automatically personalizing user interfaces. In: IJCAI ’03, pp 1613–161