318 research outputs found
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π² Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Fiscal policy plays a crucial role in ensuring economic growth and development in the country and overcoming economic recessions. The subject of the research is the tax system in the Republic of Armenia. The study aims to identify and assess the impact of the fiscal policy on economic growth in the Republic of Armenia. Since the global financial crisis of 2008, the Armenian economy has been in stagnation, reaching pre-crisis GDP levels only in 2018. Both theory and practice point to the ambiguous nature of the impact of fiscal policy on economic growth. At the same time, the 2020 crisis caused by the pandemic exacerbated the situation by focusing the attention of economists on fiscal policy to stimulate the real sector of the economy, which justifies the relevance of the current study. The paperβs novelty lies in assessing the impact of certain types of taxes on the economic growth rates in Armenia. To achieve the goal of the study, the authors use such methods as a comparative analysis of foreign studies and systemic and statistical analysis. To econometrically assess the impact of taxes on economic growth in the country, a vector autoregression (VAR) model was applied. As a result of the study, the authors found that both tax regulation in general and the individual taxes are restrictive in nature and have a negative impact on economic growth in the country. The authors conclude that such a restrictive policy has led to a slowdown in economic growth in the Republic of Armenia over the past decadesΠ€ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² Β ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΈ Β ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π² Β ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Β Π² Β ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (Π Π). Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π² Π Π. ΠΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° 2008 Π³. ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π³Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΠΠ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π² 2018 Π³. ΠΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ 2020 Π³., Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠ» ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π² Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·. Π ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ Π²Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ (VAR). Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³Π°ΠΌ Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅. Π‘Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»Π° ΠΊ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² Π Π΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ
Usually, it is diffcult for developing countries to choose a currency regulation policy because of institutional inadequacy, including a signifcant level of concentration in commodity markets, and a high degree of dependence of the national market and fnancial system on exogenous factors and a huge external debt. This article is dedicated to the analysis and evaluation of key factors affecting the formation of the Armenian national currency (dram) exchange rate, as well as to the choice of the currency regulation policy in Armenia. The authors carried out a statistical and econometric analysis of the factors of the foreign exchange rate formation, taking into account the specifcs of the transition economy as a whole, as well as the features of the Armenian economy, in particular. The authors have identifed the exogenous and endogenous factors of the foreign exchange rate formation of the dram, depending on the inο¬ow and outο¬ow of foreign currency. Further, the authors specifed the inο¬uence of dominant factors on the choice of the currency regulation policy in the country. The authors carried out an econometric analysis of the factors identifed at the frst stage of the study using the VAR model. The results obtained from this model proved the hypothesis of the non-market nature of the dramβs exchange rate formation. The authors concluded that the dramβs exchange rate formation has non-market nature because of signifcant intervention on the currency market by the βmonetary authoritiesβ. The key conclusion of this study is the thesis about the need to change the approaches to currency regulation in Armenia in favour of the transition to a free-ο¬oating exchange rate policy in order to stimulate sustainable rates of economic growth in the long term.ΠΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³Π°. ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π°ΡΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΡ (Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π·ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊ Β«Π΄Π΅Π½Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΒ». ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ VAR ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ. ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Ρ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°. ΠΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π΅
ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ°
Macroeconomic policy in Armenia over the past 30 years has led to a slowdown in economic growth. This, in turn, entails the need to revise approaches to macroeconomic regulation, as well as to search for key drivers of economic growth, which the state should emphasize in the future macroeconomic policy. The aim of this research is to analyze and assess the main drivers of economic growth in Armenia. We have employed the methods of statistical and comparative analysis, deductive analysis, as well as the analysis of historical data and the current state of the problem. The paper examines the key drivers of economic growth in Armenia, as well as periods of both a stable macroeconomic environment and economic crises, from the point of view of the efficiency and optimality of macroeconomic regulation. The current study identifies the most important sectors of the economy, analyses macroeconomic policy regulation in Armenia, and assesses the impact of such policies on economic growth in the country. The results show that todayβs macroeconomic regulation can be considered ineffective, which certainly has a negative effect on the rate of economic growth. The key conclusion of the research is the thesis that it is urgent to develop new socio-economic policy approaches to ensure sustainable economic growth in the future and to emerge quickly from future economic growth crises without restricting or halting economic activity.ΠΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 30 Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»Π° ΠΊ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΎ, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, Π²Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Ρ Π·Π° ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°, Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π² Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ. Π ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°, Π΄Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ, Π±Π΅Π·ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ, ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π² Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ Π±ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠ· Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° Π±Π΅Π· ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Effect of Age of Infusion Site and Type of Rapid-Acting Analog on Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Insulin Boluses in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Receiving Insulin Pump Therapy
OBJECTIVEβThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of type of insulin analog and age of insertion site on the pharmacodynamic characteristics of a standard insulin bolus in youth with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin pump therapy
Does the Constitution Provide More Ballot Access Protection for Presidential Elections Than for U.S. House Elections?
Both the U.S. Constitution and The Federalist Papers suggest that voters ought to have more freedom to vote for the candidate of their choice for the U.S. House of Representatives than they do for the President or the U.S. Senate. Yet, strangely, for the last thirty-three years, the U.S. Supreme Court and lower courts have ruled that the Constitution gives voters more freedom to vote for the candidate of their choice in presidential elections than in congressional elections. Also, state legislatures, which have been writing ballot access laws since 1888, have passed laws that make it easier for minor-party and independent candidates to get on the ballot for President than for the U.S. House. As a result, voters in virtually every state invariably have far more choices on their general election ballots for the President than they do for the House. This Article argues that the right of a voter to vote for someone other than a Democrat or a Republican for the House is just as important as a voterβs right to do so for President, and that courts should grant more ballot access protection to minor-party and independent candidates for the House
Determination of the proton spin structure functions for 0.05 \u3c Q(2) \u3c 5GeV(2) using CLAS
We present the results of our final analysis of the full data set of g(1)(p) (Q(2)), the spin structure function of the proton, collected using CLAS at Jefferson Laboratory in 2000-2001. Polarized electrons with energies of 1.6, 2.5, 4.2, and 5.7 GeV were scattered from proton targets ((NH3)-N-15 dynamically polarized along the beam direction) and detected with CLAS. From the measured double spin asymmetries, we extracted virtual photon asymmetries A(1)(p) and A(2)(p) and spin structure functions g(1)(p) and g(2)(p) over a wide kinematic range (0.05 GeV2 \u3c Q(2) \u3c 5 GeV2 and 1.08 GeV\u3c W \u3c 3 GeV) and calculated moments of g(1)(p). We compare our final results with various theoretical models and expectations, as well as with parametrizations of the world data. Our data, with their precision and dense kinematic coverage, are able to constrain fits of polarized parton distributions, test pQCD predictions for quark polarizations at large x, offer a better understanding of quark-hadron duality, and provide more precise values of higher twist matrix elements in the framework of the operator product expansion
The Heavy Photon Search test detector
The Heavy Photon Search (HPS), an experiment to search for a hidden sector photon in fixed target electroproduction, is preparing for installation at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) in the Fall of 2014. As the first stage of this project, the HPS Test Run apparatus was constructed and operated in 2012 to demonstrate the experimentΧ³s technical feasibility and to confirm that the trigger rates and occupancies are as expected. This paper describes the HPS Test Run apparatus and readout electronics and its performance. In this setting, a heavy photon can be identified as a narrow peak in the e+eβ invariant mass spectrum above the trident background or as a narrow invariant mass peak with a decay vertex displaced from the production target, so charged particle tracking and vertexing are needed for its detection. In the HPS Test Run, charged particles are measured with a compact forward silicon microstrip tracker inside a dipole magnet. Electromagnetic showers are detected in a PbW04 crystal calorimeter situated behind the magnet, and are used to trigger the experiment and identify electrons and positrons. Both detectors are placed close to the beam line and split top-bottom. This arrangement provides sensitivity to low-mass heavy photons, allows clear passage of the unscattered beam, and avoids the spray of degraded electrons coming from the target. The discrimination between prompt and displaced e+eβ pairs requires the first layer of silicon sensors be placed only 10 cm downstream of the target. The expected signal is small, and the trident background huge, so the experiment requires very large statistics. Accordingly, the HPS Test Run utilizes high-rate readout and data acquisition electronics and a fast trigger to exploit the essentially 100% duty cycle of the CEBAF accelerator at JLab
Virtual Compton Scattering and the Generalized Polarizabilities of the Proton at Q^2=0.92 and 1.76 GeV^2
Virtual Compton Scattering (VCS) on the proton has been studied at Jefferson
Lab using the exclusive photon electroproduction reaction (e p --> e p gamma).
This paper gives a detailed account of the analysis which has led to the
determination of the structure functions P_LL-P_TT/epsilon and P_LT, and the
electric and magnetic generalized polarizabilities (GPs) alpha_E(Q^2) and
beta_M(Q^2) at values of the four-momentum transfer squared Q^2= 0.92 and 1.76
GeV^2. These data, together with the results of VCS experiments at lower
momenta, help building a coherent picture of the electric and magnetic GPs of
the proton over the full measured Q^2-range, and point to their non-trivial
behavior.Comment: version 2: modified according to PRC Editor's and Referee's
recommendations. Archival paper for the E93-050 experiment at JLab Hall A. 28
pages, 23 figures, 5 cross-section tables. To be submitted to Phys.Rev.
The ratio of proton's electric to magnetic form factors measured by polarization transfer
The ratio of the proton's elastic electromagnetic form factors was obtained
by measuring the transverse and longitudinal polarizations of recoiling protons
from the elastic scattering of polarized electrons with unpolarized protons.
The ratio of the electric to magnetic form factor is proportional to the ratio
of the transverse to longitudinal recoil polarizations. The ratio was measured
over a range of four-momentum transfer squared between 0.5 and 3.5 GeV-squared.
Simultaneous measurement of transverse and longitudinal polarizations in a
polarimeter provides good control of the systematic uncertainty. The results
for the ratio of the proton's electric to magnetic form factors show a
systematic decrease with increasing four momentum squared, indicating for the
first time a marked difference in the spatial distribution of charge and
magnetization currents in the proton.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures, version of paper after corrections due to
referees comments and shortened by removing one figure for Physical Review
Letter
- β¦