Tocilizumab and corticosteroids for covid-19 treatment in elderly patients

Background. The mortality rate for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) increases with age. Some anti-inflammatory drugs such as tocilizumab or steroids have been proposed for the treatment of severe disease; however, few data are available in the elderly. Methods. A retrospective case-series of patients hospitalized between March 1st and June 15th, 2020 with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR testing on throat/nasopharyngeal swabs and age ≥ 65 years was analysed. Patients were retrospectively divided into three groups according to the chosen treatment [standard of care (SOC), tocilizumab or corticosteroids] and patient characteristics and occurrence of adverse events were compared among groups. Results. Overall, 206 patients were included, 148 treated with standard of care, 42 with steroids and 16 with tocilizumab. Patients treated with steroids or Tocilizumab presented more frequently with fever (p = .003), dyspnea (p < .001), bilateral opacities/infiltrates at chest X-ray (p =.026) or CT-scan (p = .020), and more frequently required non-invasive/invasive ventilation (p < .001). Crude mortality was 27%, without differences among groups (p = .074). No specific adverse events were observed during/after the administration of steroids or tocilizumab; however, a trend towards an increased risk of secondary infections was described compared to SOC (p = .097). At multivariate logistic regression, only tocilizumab administration was an independent predictor of secondary infections (aOR = 6.72, 95% CI = 1.43-31.39, p = .015). Conclusions. Tocilizumab and corticosteroid could have a possible role for severe form of pneumonia in course of COVID-19 also in elderly patients, even if great attention to the monitoring of infectious complications should be paid in this special population

Influence of HIV-1 V2 sequence variability on bacterial translocation in antiretroviral naïve HIV-1 infected patients

HIV-1 V2 domain binds α4β7, which assists lymphocyte homing to gut-associated lymphoid tissue. This triggers bacterial translocation, thus contributing to immune activation. We investigated whether variability of V2 179-181 binding site could influence plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14), markers of microbial translocation/immune activation. HIV gp120 sequences from antiretroviral naïve patients were analyzed for V2 tripeptide composition, length, net charge, and potential N-linked-glycosylation sites. LPS and sCD14 plasma levels were quantified. Clinical/immuno-virologic data were retrieved. Overall, 174 subjects were enrolled, 8% with acute infection, 71% harboring a subtype B. LDV179-181 was detected in 41% and LDI in 27%. No difference was observed between levels of LPS or sCD14 according to different mimotopes or according to other sequence characteristics. By multivariable analysis, only acute infection was significantly associated with higher sCD14 levels. In conclusion, no association was observed between V2 tripeptide composition and extent of bacterial translocation/immune activation

Emerging issue of fluconazole-resistant candidemia in a tertiary care hospital of southern italy: time for antifungal stewardship program

An increased number of patients is at risk of Candida spp. bloodstream infection (CBSI) in modern medicine. Moreover, the rising of antifungal resistance (AR) was recently reported. All consecutive CBSI occurred in our Hospital (consisting of 1,370 beds) between 2015 and 2018, were reviewed. For each case, Candida species, AR pattern, ward involved and demographic data of patients were recorded. Overall, 304 episodes of CBSI occurred, with a median (q1:first-,q3:third quartile) of 77 (71-82) CBSI/year. Over the years, a significant increase of CBSI due to C. albicans compared to non-albicans strains was recorded in medical wards (from 65% to 71%, p=0.030), while this ratio remained stable in others. An increase of resistant strains to multiple antifungals such as C. guillermondii was noticed in recent years (from 0% to 9.8%, p=0.008). Additionally, from 2015 to 2018 an increase in fluconazole-resistance was recorded in our Hospital (from 7.4% to 17.4%, p=0.025) and a slight increase in voriconazole-resistance (from 0% to 7% in 2018, p=0.161) was observed, while resistance to echinocandin and amphotericin B remained firmly below 2%. This study suggests a rapid spread of antifungal resistance in our Hospital; therefore, an appropriate antifungal stewardship programs is urgently warranted. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of SFMM

Stigma and mental health among people living with HIV across the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Mental health (MH) is extremely relevant when referring to people living with a chronic disease, such as people living with HIV (PLWH). In fact – although life expectancy and quality have increased since the advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART) – PLWH carry a high incidence of mental disorders, and this burden has been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scenario, UNAIDS has set new objectives for 2025, such as the linkage of at least 90% of PLWH to people-centered, context-specific MH services. Aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MD in PLWH followed at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases of the University of Bari, Italy. Methods From January 10th to September 10th, 2022, all PLWH patients accessing our outpatient clinic were offered the following standardized tools: HAM-A for anxiety, BDI-II for depression, PC-PTSD-5 for post-traumatic stress disorder, CAGE-AID for alcohol-drug abuse. Factors associated with testing positive to the four MD were explored with a multivariable logistic regression model. Results 578 out of 1110 HIV-patients agreed to receive MH screening, with 141 (24.4%) people resulting positive to at least one MH disorder. HAM-A was positive in 15.8% (n = 91), BDI-II in 18% (n = 104), PC-PTSD-5 in 5% (n = 29) and CAGE in 6.1% (n = 35). The multivariable logistic regression showed a higher probability of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder for PLWH who reported severe stigma, social isolation, psychological deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic and for those receiving a dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimen. Moreover, history of drug use (OR 1.13; [95% CE 1.06–4.35]), family stigma (2.42 [1.65–3.94]) and social isolation (2.72 [1.55;4.84]) were found to be associated to higher risk for substance use disorder. Conclusions In this study, stigma was a strong predictor for being diagnosed of a MH disorder among PLWH. Also, the possible role of dolutegravir as a risk factor for the onset of MH disorders should be considered in clinical practice, and MH of patients receiving DTG-containing regimens should be constantly monitored

Efficacy of Remdesivir and Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies in Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Reducing the Risk of Disease Progression in Elderly or Immunocompromised Hosts Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Introduction: Remdesivir (REM) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could alleviate severe COVID-19 in at-risk outpatients. However, data on their use in hospitalized patients, particularly in elderly or immunocompromised hosts, are lacking. Methods: All consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at our unit from 1 July 2021 to 15 March 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome was the progression to severe COVID-19 (P/F &lt; 200). Descriptive statistics, a Cox univariate-multivariate model, and an inverse probability treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis were performed. Results: Overall, 331 subjects were included; their median (q1-q3) age was 71 (51-80) years, and they were males in 52% of the cases. Of them, 78 (23%) developed severe COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 14%; it was higher in those with disease progression (36% vs. 7%, p &lt; 0.001). REM and mAbs resulted in a 7% (95%CI = 3-11%) and 14% (95%CI = 3-25%) reduction in the risk of severe COVID-19, respectively, after adjusting the analysis with the IPTW. In addition, by evaluating only immunocompromised hosts, the combination of REM and mAbs was associated with a significantly lower incidence of severe COVID-19 (aHR = 0.06, 95%CI = 0.02-0.77) when compared with monotherapy. Conclusions: REM and mAbs may reduce the risk of COVID-19 progression in hospitalized patients. Importantly, in immunocompromised hosts, the combination of mAbs and REM may be beneficial

Additional file 1 of Stigma and mental health among people living with HIV across the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Supplementary Material

Real life experience on the use of Remdesivir in patients admitted to COVID-19 in two referral Italian hospital: a propensity score matched analysis

: Remdesivir (RDV)&nbsp;was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication for COVID-19, with discordant data on efficacy in reducing mortality risk and disease progression. In the context of a dynamic and rapidly changing pandemic landscape, the utilization of real-world evidence is of utmost importance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of RDV on patients who have been admitted to two university referral hospitals in Italy due to COVID-19. All patients older than 18&nbsp;years and hospitalized at two different universities (Bari and Palermo) were enrolled in this study. To minimize the effect of potential confounders, we used propensity score matching with one case (Remdesivir) and one control that never experienced this kind of intervention during hospitalization. Mortality was the primary outcome of our investigation, and it was recorded using death certificates and/or medical records. Severe COVID-19 was defined as admission to the intensive care unit or a qSOFAscore ≥ 2 or CURB65scores ≥ 3. After using propensity score matching, 365 patients taking Remdesivir and 365 controls were included. No significant differences emerged between the two groups in terms of mean age and percentage of females, while patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently active smokers (p &lt; 0.0001). Moreover, the patients taking Remdesivir were less frequently vaccinated against COVID-19. All the other clinical, radiological, and pharmacological parameters were balanced between the two groups. The use of Remdesivir in our cohort was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality during the follow-up period (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.86; p = 0.007). Moreover, RDV was associated with a significantly lower incidence of non-invasive ventilation (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.36). Furthermore, in the 365 patients taking Remdesivir, we observed two cases of mild renal failure requiring a reduction in the dosage of Remdesivir and two cases in which the physicians decided to interrupt Remdesivir for bradycardia and for QT elongation. Our study suggests that the use of Remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is a safe therapy associated with improved clinical outcomes, including halving of mortality and with a reduction of around 75% of the risk of invasive ventilation. In a constantly changing COVID-19 scenario, ongoing research is necessary to tailor treatment decisions based on the latest scientific evidence and optimize patient outcomes

Polypharmacy, anticholinergic burden and drug–drug interaction assessment in people with four-class-resistant HIV: data from the PRESTIGIO registry

Objectives: To evaluate polypharmacy, anticholinergic burden (ACB) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in people with four-class-resistant HIV (4DR-PWH). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study, including 4DR-PWH from the PRESTIGIO Registry taking at least one non-antiretroviral drug. Polypharmacy was defined as taking five or more non-antiretroviral drugs. ACB was calculated using the ACB scale: 0 = no AC effect, 1-2 = low/moderate risk, &gt;= 3 = high AC risk. Participants' characteristics by ACB score were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess linear relationships. DDIs were evaluated using the Liverpool database. Results: Overall, 172 4DR-PLWH were evaluated: 75.6% males, median age 49.9 years (IQR = 45.6-56), 62 (27.1%) on polypharmacy, 124 (72.1%) using a boosting agent and 72 (41.8%) with four or more antiretrovirals. Based on ACB, 128 (74.45%), 33 (19.2%) and 11 (6.4%) had a no, low/moderate and high AC risk, respectively. The most common AC drugs were beta-blockers (12.2%), diuretics (8.7%) and antidepressants (8.7%). The high ACB was significantly related to the number of drugs/person (r = 0.33, P &lt; 0.0001) and the number of clinical events (r = 0.222, P = 0.004). Overall, 258 DDIs were found between antiretrovirals and co-medications in 115 (66.8%) PWH, and 14 (8.1%) PWH received contraindicated drug combinations. Conclusions: In 4DR-PWH, polypharmacy, DDIs and the proportion of people with moderate/high AC burden were high. In 4DR-PWH undetectability achievement and maintenance is the priority and use of boosted PIs is common. A strict collaboration (infectious diseases specialists, virologists, pharmacologists) is needed to limit the risk of ACB and DDIs and to explore the advantages of new antiretrovirals