52 research outputs found

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Developing and Presenting Auditory Demonstrations: Two Sound Editor Programs

    No full text
    Experiencing examples of auditory phenomena can clarify textbook and lecture explanations. The addition of visual displays to auditory demonstrations can make them more understandable. Two sound editor programs, Audacity® and Adobe Audition Pro 2.0®, provide excellent capabilities for the display and authoring of auditory demonstrations. Audacity possesses a considerable price advantage, whereas Audition has better capabilities for presenting and producing demonstrations

    Introductory Readings for Cognitive Psychology

    No full text

    Management of hypotension after general anaesthesia induction - multicenter questionnaire study

    No full text
    Cíl studie: Cílem naší práce bylo posouzení variability terapie hypotenze po úvodu do celkové anestezie (GAIH). Typ studie: Multicentrická dotazníková studie. Typ pracovišť: Osm anesteziologických pracovišť různé velikosti z České a Slovenské republiky. Materiál a metoda: Respondenti odpovídali na tři identifikační otázky (pracoviště, délka praxe, specializovaná způsobilost) a deset zjišťovacích otázek týkajících se managementu GAIH v online dotazníku. Byla použita jednoduchá popisná statistika hodnotící zastoupení odpovědí respondentů v absolutních a relativních četnostech. Normalizovaná entropie (H) byla použita k posouzení variability odpovědí. Výsledky: Plně vyplněný dotazník jsme získali od 172 respondentů. Největší míra variability byla pozorována u otázky č. 1.: „Za referenční hodnotu tlaku krve, se kterou porovnávám další hodnoty..., považuji…“ (H = 0,966). Nejnižší míra variability odpovědí byla zaznamenána u otázky č. 4.: „Za hypotenzi považuji pokles…“ (H = 0,070). Závěr: Výsledky práce ukazují vysokou variabilitu názorů na terapii GAIH.Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the management of hypotension after general anaesthesia induction (GAIH). Design: Multicenter questionnaire study. Setting: Eight different size anaesthesiology departments located in the Czech or Slovak Republics. Materials and methods: The respondents responded to three identification questions (workplace, length of practince) and ten GAIH management questions in our online questionnaire. Simple descriptive statistics describing the representation of the respondents' answers in absolute and relative terms were used. Normalized entropy (H) was used to assess the variability of responses. Results: A fully completed questionnaire was obtained from 172 respondents. The highest rate of variability was observed in question 1.: "As the baseline blood pressure value (BP), to which I compare other BP values, I consider..." H = 0.966. The lowest response variability rate was observed in question 4.: "As hypotension, I consider the Of BP..." H = 0.07). Conclusion: Our results indicate high variability of GAIH management among anaesthetists.Web of Science303-412511
    corecore