Revealing Methodological Challenges in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Studies Assessing Comorbidities:A Narrative Review

Beyond respiratory impairment, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer from comorbidities which are associated with worse health status, higher health care costs and worse prognosis. Reported prevalences of comorbidities largely differ between studies which might be explained by different assessment methods (objective assessment, self-reported assessment, or assessment by medical records), heterogeneous study populations, inappropriate control groups, incomparable methodologies, etc. This narrative review demonstrates and further evaluates the variability in prevalence of several comorbidities in patients with COPD and control individuals and discusses several shortcomings and pitfalls which need to be considered when interpreting comorbidity data. Like in other chronic organ diseases, the accurate diagnosis and integrated management of comorbidities is a key for outcome in COPD. This review highlights that there is a need to move from the starting point of an established index disease towards the concept of the development of multimorbidity in the elderly including COPD as an important and highly prevalent pulmonary component

Airflow Obstruction and Cardio-metabolic Comorbidities

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by airflow obstruction and often co-exists with cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension and diabetes. This international study assessed the association between airflow obstruction and these comorbidities. 23,623 participants (47.5% males, 19.0% current smokers, age: 55.1 +/- 10.8 years) in 33 centers in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) initiative were included. 10.4% of subjects had airflow obstruction. Self-reports of physician-diagnosed CVD (heart disease or stroke), hypertension and diabetes were regressed against airflow obstruction (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <5th percentile of reference values), adjusting for age, sex, smoking (including pack-years), body mass index and education. Analyses were undertaken within center and meta-analyzed across centers checking heterogeneity using the I-2-statistic. Crude odds ratios for the association with airflow obstruction were 1.42 (95% CI: 1.20-1.69) for CVD, 1.24 (1.02-1.51) for hypertension, and 0.93 (0.76-1.15) for diabetes. After adjustment these were 1.00 (0.86-1.16) (I-2:6%) for CVD, 1.14 (0.99-1.31) (I-2:53%) for hypertension, and 0.76 (0.64-0.89) (I-2:1%) for diabetes with similar results for men and women, smokers and nonsmokers, in richer and poorer centers. Alternatively defining airflow obstruction by FEV1/FVC <2.5th percentile or 0.70, did not yield significant other results. In conclusion, the associations of CVD and hypertension with airflow obstruction in the general population are largely explained by age and smoking habits. The adjusted risk for diabetes is lower in subjects with airflow obstruction. These findings emphasize the role of common risk factors in explaining the coexistence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities and COPD

Disease-Specific Comorbidity Clusters in COPD and Accelerated Aging

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer from multiple morbidities, which occur in clusters and are sometimes related to accelerated aging. This study aimed to assess the disease specificity of comorbidity clusters in COPD and their association with a biomarker of accelerated aging as a potential mechanistic factor. Methods: Body composition, metabolic, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and psychological morbidities were objectively evaluated in 208 COPD patients (age 62 &#177; 7 years, 58% males, FEV1 50 &#177; 16% predicted) and 200 non-COPD controls (age 61 &#177; 7 years, 45% males). Based on their presence and severity, the morbidities were clustered to generate distinct clusters in COPD and controls. Telomere length in circulating leukocytes was compared across the clusters. Results: (co)morbidities were more prevalent in COPD patients compared to controls (3.9 &#177; 1.7 vs. 2.4 &#177; 1.5, p &lt; 0.05). A &#8220;Psychologic&#8222; and &#8220;Cachectic&#8222; cluster were only present in the COPD population. &#8220;Less (co)morbidity&#8222;, &#8220;Cardiovascular&#8222;, and &#8220;Metabolic&#8222; clusters were also observed in controls, although with less complexity. Telomere length was reduced in COPD patients, but did not differ between the (co)morbidity clusters in both populations. Conclusions: Two COPD-specific comorbidity clusters, a &#8220;Cachectic&#8222; and &#8220;Psychologic&#8222; cluster, were identified and warrant further studies regarding their development. Accelerated aging was present across various multimorbidity clusters in COPD

Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a nationwide observational study of 8075 participants

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been largely used and investigated as therapy for COVID-19 across&nbsp;various settings at a total dose usually ranging from 2400 mg to 9600 mg. In Belgium, off-label use&nbsp;of low-dose HCQ (total 2400 mg over 5 days) was recommended for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality in the Belgian national COVID-19&nbsp;hospital surveillance data. Patients treated either with HCQ monotherapy and supportive care (HCQ group)&nbsp;were compared with patients treated with supportive care only (no-HCQ group) using a competing risks&nbsp;proportional hazards regression with discharge alive as competing risk, adjusted for demographic and&nbsp;clinical features with robust standard errors. Of 8075 patients with complete discharge data on 24 May&nbsp;2020 and diagnosed before 1 May 2020, 4542 received HCQ in monotherapy and 3533 were in the no-HCQ group. Death was reported in 804/4542 (17.7%) and 957/3533 (27.1%), respectively. In the&nbsp;multivariable analysis, mortality was lower in the HCQ group compared with the no-HCQ group [adjusted hazard&nbsp;ratio (aHR) = 0.684, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617–0.758]. Compared with the no-HCQ group,&nbsp;mortality in the HCQ group was reduced both in patients diagnosed ≤5 days ( n = 3975) and &gt; 5 days ( n =&nbsp;3487) after symptom onset [aHR = 0.701 (95% CI 0.617–0.796) and aHR = 0.647 (95% CI 0.525–0.797),&nbsp;respectively]. Compared with supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was independently&nbsp;associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later&nbsp;after symptom&nbsp;onset.</p

Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a nationwide observational study of 8075 participants

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been largely used and investigated as therapy for COVID-19 across various settings at a total dose usually ranging from 2400 mg to 9600 mg. In Belgium, off-label use of low-dose HCQ (total 2400 mg over 5 days) was recommended for hospitalised patients with COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-hospital mortality in the Belgian national COVID-19 hospital surveillance data. Patients treated either with HCQ monotherapy and supportive care (HCQ group) were compared with patients treated with supportive care only (no-HCQ group) using a competing risks proportional hazards regression with discharge alive as competing risk, adjusted for demographic and clinical features with robust standard errors. Of 8075 patients with complete discharge data on 24 May 2020 and diagnosed before 1 May 2020, 4542 received HCQ in monotherapy and 3533 were in the no-HCQ group. Death was reported in 804/4542 (17.7%) and 957/3533 (27.1%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, mortality was lower in the HCQ group compared with the no-HCQ group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.684, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.758]. Compared with the no-HCQ group, mortality in the HCQ group was reduced both in patients diagnosed ≤5 days (n = 3975) and >5 days (n = 3487) after symptom onset [aHR = 0.701 (95% CI 0.617-0.796) and aHR = 0.647 (95% CI 0.525-0.797), respectively]. Compared with supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was independently associated with lower mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later after symptom onset.status: publishe

Impact of solid cancer on in-hospital mortality overall and among different subgroups of patients with COVID-19: a nationwide, population-based analysis

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe