21 research outputs found

    Correlates of circulating ovarian cancer early detection markers and their contribution to discrimination of early detection models: results from the EPIC cohort.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer early detection markers CA125, CA15.3, HE4, and CA72.4 vary between healthy women, limiting their utility for screening. METHODS: We evaluated cross-sectional relationships between lifestyle and reproductive factors and these markers among controls (n = 1910) from a nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Improvements in discrimination of prediction models adjusting for correlates of the markers were evaluated among postmenopausal women in the nested case-control study (n = 590 cases). Generalized linear models were used to calculate geometric means of CA125, CA15.3, and HE4. CA72.4 above vs. below limit of detection was evaluated using logistic regression. Early detection prediction was modeled using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: CA125 concentrations were lower, and CA15.3 higher, in post- vs. premenopausal women (p ≤ 0.02). Among postmenopausal women, CA125 was higher among women with higher parity and older age at menopause (ptrend ≤ 0.02), but lower among women reporting oophorectomy, hysterectomy, ever use of estrogen-only hormone therapy, or current smoking (p < 0.01). CA15.3 concentrations were higher among heavier women and in former smokers (p ≤ 0.03). HE4 was higher with older age at blood collection and in current smokers, and inversely associated with OC use duration, parity, and older age at menopause (≤ 0.02). No associations were observed with CA72.4. Adjusting for correlates of the markers in prediction models did not improve the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into sources of variation in ovarian cancer early detection markers in healthy women and informs about the utility of individualizing marker cutpoints based on epidemiologic factors

    Personalization in Skipforward, an Ontology-Based Distributed Annotation System

    No full text
    Abstract. Skipforward is a distributed annotation system allowing users to enter and browse statements about items and their features. Items can be things such as movies or books; item features are the genre of a movie or the storytelling pace of a book. Whenever multiple users annotate the same item with a statement about the same feature, these individual statements get aggregated by the system. For aggregation, individual user statements are weighted according to a competence metric based on the constrained Pearson correlation, adapted for Skipforward data: A user gets assigned high competence with regard to the feature in question if, for other items and the same feature type, he had a similar opinion to the current user. Since the competence metric is dependent on the user currently viewing the data, the user’s view of the data is completely personalized. In this paper, the personalization aspect as well as the item and expert recommender are presented.

    Real-time qPCR validation of changes in expression of eight selected genes observed in microarray analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Bars represent the mean ± SD of fold change relative to growth medium control. At least 3 independent experiments were performed for each treatment. All genes were normalized to GAPDH. Asterisks placed vertically denote p values for each PIC treatment relative to HEC used as a reference. (***p<0.0005, **p<0.005, *p< 0.05; Student t-test)</p

    Transcription profile of the 20 discriminatory genes expression in Vk2 cells exposed to candidate microbicides and selected PICs and NICs.

    No full text
    <p>Columns represent treatments, rows represent genes. Gene expression levels are indicated by color: red is for upregulation and green is for downregulation. Expression data are averages from at least six experiments/microarrays for each treatment. Clustering based on 20 PIC/NIC discriminatory genes places C31G (known as causing inflammatory response) to the PIC category, while dextran sulfate (DS) and cellulose sulfate (CS)—into the NIC group.</p

    Functional categories of the PIC/NIC discriminatory genes<sup>a</sup>.

    No full text
    <p><sup><b>a</b></sup>Classification is based on IPA functional analysis and published literature. P values are estimated by IPA</p><p>Functional categories of the PIC/NIC discriminatory genes<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0128557#t004fn001" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a>.</p
    corecore