Is severe COVID-19 a cytokine storm syndrome: a hyperinflammatory debate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health crisis with considerable mortality and morbidity. A role for cytokine storm and therapeutic immunomodulation in a subgroup of patients with severe COVID-19 was proposed early in the pandemic. The concept of cytokine storm in COVID-19 has been criticised, given the lack of clear definition and relatively modest cytokinaemia (which may be necessary for viral clearance) compared with acute respiratory distress syndrome and bacterial sepsis. Here we consider the argument for and against the concept of cytokine storm in COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: Several criteria have been proposed to identify the subgroup of COVID-19 patients exhibiting a cytokine storm. The beneficial effect of corticosteroids and interleukin-6 inhibition suggest that inflammation is a modifiable pathogenic component of severe COVID-19. The presence of genetic polymorphisms and pathogenic auto-autoantibodies in severe COVID-19 also suggests a significant contribution of immune dysregulation to poor outcomes. SUMMARY: Hyperinflammation is a key component of severe COVID-19, residing underneath the cytokine storm umbrella term, associated with poor outcomes. Better understanding of the aetiopathogenesis, with identification of biomarkers to predict treatment responses and prognosis, will hopefully enable a stratified and ultimately precision medicine approach

Long-term remission in idiopathic Castleman's disease with tocilizumab followed by consolidation with high-dose melphalan-two case studies.

Multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) is an uncommon lymphoproliferative disorder, often associated with a clinically aggressive behavior. No standard treatment has been established, but patients are usually treated with lymphoma-type regimens such as rituximab or combination chemotherapy. Recently, immunotherapies targeting IL-6 have proven effective and have been approved for this indication. However, these agents require long-term administration. Here, we describe the clinical course of two patients, refractory to rituximab and chemotherapy, showing long-term remission (18 and 24 months), following an induction phase with tocilizumab (an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody) and a consolidative phase with high-dose melphalan accompanied by autologous stem cell support. This may prove to be an effective option for this group of patients with an orphan disorder

Intralesional Triamcinolone May Not Be Beneficial for Treating Acute Hidradenitis Suppurativa Lesions: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory condition characterized by recurrent nodules, sinus tracts, comedones, and scarring. Hidradenitis suppurativa is often associated with pain and decreased quality of life. Limited clinical trial data exist regarding the management of acute HS lesions, but clinical experience and a prospective case series suggest that intralesional triamcinolone may be useful. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone to placebo for the treatment of HS inflammatory lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing intralesional triamcinolone 10 mg/mL, triamcinolone 40 mg/mL, and normal saline (NS). Thirty-two subjects at University of North Carolina Dermatology and Skin Cancer Centers were enrolled for a total of 67 lesions. Subjects reported pain scores, days to resolution, and satisfaction on a standardized survey over a 14-day period. RESULTS: When intralesional injections of triamcinolone 10 mg/mL, triamcinolone 40 mg/mL, and NS were compared, no significant difference was found for days to HS inflammatory lesion clearance, pain reduction at Day 5, or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between varying concentrations of triamcinolone and NS for the treatment of HS lesions. Steroid injections may be less effective for the management of acute HS than typically presumed

Optimisation of anti-interleukin-6 therapy: Precision medicine through mathematical modelling

BackgroundDysregulated interleukin (IL)-6 production can be characterised by the levels present, the kinetics of its rise and its inappropriate location. Rapid, excessive IL-6 production can exacerbate tissue damage in vital organs. In this situation, therapy with an anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) monoclonal antibody, if inappropriately dosed, may be insufficient to fully block IL-6 signalling and normalise the immune response.MethodsWe analysed inhibition of C-reactive protein (CRP) – a biomarker for IL-6 activity – in patients with COVID-19 or idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) treated with tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R) or siltuximab (anti-IL-6), respectively. We used mathematical modelling to analyse how to optimise anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R blockade for the high levels of IL-6 observed in these diseases.ResultsIL-6 signalling was insufficiently inhibited in patients with COVID-19 or iMCD treated with standard doses of anti-IL-6 therapy. Patients whose disease worsened throughout therapy had only partial inhibition of CRP production. Our model demonstrated that, in a scenario representative of iMCD with persistent high IL-6 production not controlled by a single dose of anti-IL-6 therapy, repeated administration more effectively inhibited IL-6 activity. In a situation with rapid, high, dysregulated IL-6 production, such as severe COVID-19 or a cytokine storm, repeated daily administration of an anti-IL-6/anti-IL-6R agent, or alternating daily doses of anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R therapies, could neutralise IL-6 activity.ConclusionIn clinical practice, IL-6 inhibition should be individualised based on pathophysiology to achieve full blockade of CRP production.FundingEUSA Pharma funded medical writing assistance and provided access to the phase II clinical data of siltuximab for analysis

Rare disease research requires (and benefits from) global collaboration: three examples from the Castleman Disease Collaborative Network

Castleman disease (CD) describes a heterogeneous group of rare and poorly understood lymphoproliferative disorders that can involve flu-like symptoms, multiple organ system dysfunction, and even death. Prior to 2012, the limited and disparate resources, including clinical data, tissue samples, and research funding, prevented the medical community from making positive strides towards understanding the pathogenesis of CD. The Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN) was created in 2012 to accelerate research and drug development for CD by facilitating global collaboration, strategically investing in high impact research, and engaging patients throughout the research process. The CDCN’s global collaborative network has been crucial for accelerating the understanding of CD. Together, the CDCN has already helped establish a uniform terminology system and a new model of pathogenesis. With the CDCN’s network in place and an ambitious international research agenda, further breakthroughs for CD are on the horizon. In this paper, we report three examples of how global collaboration has helped to advance CD research, which we believe can serve as models for other research networks and international investigators

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence in an Italian cohort of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: A multi-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) includes two distinct conditions, with different histologic features and prognosis: non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Furthermore, NASH is the more aggressive necro-inflammatory form, which may accumulate fibrosis and result in End stage liver disease (ESLD). NAFLD is also linked to systemic inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis. NAFLD is currently the most common cause of ESLD in Western countries, becoming a serious public health concern. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a systemic inflammatory/autoinflammatory disease of the terminal follicular epithelium of the apocrine gland with a prevalence of 0.05% to 4.10%. Due to its systemic inflammatory behavior several comorbidities were recently associated, however liver ones were scarcely assessed. AIM To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of NASH/NAFL in HS patients. METHODS This retrospective study is a sub-analysis of a larger study carried out in 4 Italian dermatological centers. In this cohort, there were 83 patients: 51 patients with HS only, 20 patients with HS/NAFL and 12 with HS/NASH. RESULTS Inflammatory comorbidities were present in 3.9% of HS only patients, 25% of HS/NAFL patients and 58.3% of HS/NASH patients (P < 0.001). Similarly, mean Autoinflammatory Disease Damage Index (ADDI) was significantly higher among patients with HS/NASH (5.3 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) compared to patients with HS/NAFL or HS only (2.8 ± 1.6 and 2.6 ± 1.4 respectively). Furthermore, ADDI correlates with IHS4 in HS, HS/NAFL and HS/NASH. Diabetic patients have higher Hurley score than not diabetic ones. Ultrasound examination was significantly different in the three groups. CONCLUSION HS patients displayed a high prevalence of NASH/NAFLD and ultrasound examination should be particularly addressed to patients that display high ADDI scores

An open-label continuation trial of sirolimus for tocilizumab-refractory idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibitors are the first-line treatment for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD); however, there is no established treatment for cases that are resistant to IL-6 inhibitors. Although sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been suggested to be effective in patients with iMCD, the long-term safety and efficacy of sirolimus on individuals with IL-6 inhibitor-resistant iMCD have not been evaluated. METHODS/DESIGN: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label trial, the long-term safety of sirolimus will be evaluated in patients pating in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial on tocilizumab (TCZ)-resistant iMCD. The study will be conducted in 7 centers in Japan. This trial will be promptly started after the evaluation and examination for 16 weeks in the preceding study. The trial will be completed by the time the drug is approved for iMCD treatment in Japan. The primary endpoint is the incidence of adverse events. The secondary endpoints include the following: the levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein; change in CHAP score; physician global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); patient global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); and lymph node changes in subjects with lymphadenopathy. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial will provide evidence regarding the long-term safety of sirolimus as a potential novel therapeutic agent for patients with tocilizumab-resistant iMCD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT2051200050