Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV in stage 4–stage 5 chronic kidney disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis

Background: Hepatitis C is an important agent of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease and the advent of DAAs has dramatically changed the management of HCV positive patients, including those with advanced CKD. Sofosbuvir is the backbone of many anti-HCV regimens based on DAAs but it remains unclear whether it is appropriate for HCV-infected patients with stage 4-5 CKD.Study aims and design: We performed a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF-based DAA regimens in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. The primary outcome was sustained viral response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were the frequency of SAEs and drop-outs due to AEs (as measures of tolerability). The random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird was adopted, with heterogeneity and stratified analyses.Results: Thirty clinical studies (n=1537 unique patients) were retrieved. The pooled SVR12 and SAEs rate was 0.99 (95% confidence intervals, 0.97; 1.0, I2=99.8%) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05; 0.13, I2=84.3%), respectively. The pooled SVR12 rate in studies with high HCV RNA levels at baseline was lower, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75; 1.0, I2=73.3%) (P<0.001). The pooled drop-out rate due to AEs was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.01; 0.04, I2=16.1%). Common serious adverse events were anemia (n=26, 38%) and reduced eGFR (n=14, 19%). SAEs were more common in studies adopting full-dose sofosbuvir (pooled rate of SAEs 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06; 0.25; I2=80.1%) and in those based on ribavirin (0.15, 95% CI, 0.07; 0.23, I2=95.8%). Six studies (n=69 patients) reported eGFR levels at baseline/post- antiviral therapy; no consistent changes were found.Conclusions: SOF-based regimens appear safe and effective in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. Serum creatinine should be carefully monitored during therapy with SOF in patients with CKD. Randomized controlled studies in order to expand our knowledge on this point are under way.Fil: Fabrizi, Fabrizio. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano; ItaliaFil: Cerutti, Roberta. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano; ItaliaFil: Dixit, Vivek. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano; ItaliaFil: Ridruejo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. CEMIC-CONICET. Centro de Educaciones Médicas e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno". CEMIC-CONICET; Argentin

An update on hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is a major public health issue globally and the risk of cancer (including HCC) is greater in patients on long-term dialysis and kidney transplant compared with the general population. According to an international study on 831,804 patients on long-term dialysis, the standardized incidence ratio for liver cancer was 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0–1.4) and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3–1.7) in European and USA cohorts, respectively. It appears that important predictors of HCC in dialysis population are hepatotropic viruses (HBV and HCV) and cirrhosis. 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are lower in HCC patients on long-term dialysis than those with HCC and intact kidneys. NAFLD is a metabolic disease with increasing prevalence worldwide and recent evidence shows that it is an important cause of liver-related and extra liver-related diseases (including HCC and CKD, respectively). Some longitudinal studies have shown that patients with chronic hepatitis B are aging and the frequency of comorbidities (such as HCC and CKD) is increasing over time in these patients; it has been suggested to connect these patients to an appropriate care earlier. Antiviral therapy of HBV and HCV plays a pivotal role in the management of HCC in CKD and some combinations of DAAs (elbasvir/grazoprevir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sofosbuvir-based regimens) are now available for HCV positive patients and advanced chronic kidney disease. The interventional management of HCC includes liver resection. Some ablative techniques have been suggested for HCC in CKD patients who are not appropriate candidates to surgery. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization has been proposed for HCC in patients who are not candidates to liver surgery due to comorbidities. The gold standard for early-stage HCC in patients with chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis is still liver transplant.Fil: Fabrizi, Fabrizio. No especifíca;Fil: Cerutti, Roberta. No especifíca;Fil: Alfieri, Carlo M.. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Ridruejo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. CEMIC-CONICET. Centro de Educaciones Médicas e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno". CEMIC-CONICET; Argentin

Direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV-associated glomerular disease and the current evidence

Glomerular disease is an extra-hepatic manifestation of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is the most frequent glomerular disease associated with HCV. It occurs commonly in patients with HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome. Patients with HCV-related glomerular disease have been historically a difficult-to-treat group. The therapeutic armamentarium for HCV-related glomerular disease now includes antiviral regimens, selective or non-specific immunosuppressive drugs, immunomodulators, and symptomatic agents. The treatment of HCV-associated glomerular disease is dependent on the clinical presentation of the patient. The recent introduction of all-oral, interferon (IFN)-free/ribavirin (RBV)-free regimens is dramatically changing the course of HCV in the general population, and some regimens have been approved for HCV even in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. According to a systematic review of the medical literature, the evidence concerning the efficacy/safety of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) of HCV-induced glomerular disease is limited. The frequency of sustained virological response was 92.5% (62/67). Full or partial clinical remission was demonstrated in many patients (n = 46, 68.5%) after DAAs. There were no reports of deterioration of kidney function in patients on DAAs. Many patients (n = 29, 43%) underwent immunosuppression while on DAAs. A few cases of new onset or relapsing glomerular disease in patients with HCV successfully treated with DAAs have been observed. In summary, DAA-based combinations are making easier the management of HCV. However, patients with HCV-induced glomerular disease are still a difficult-to-treat group even at the time of DAAs.Fil: Fabrizi, Fabrizio. No especifíca;Fil: Cerutti, Roberta. No especifíca;Fil: Porata, Giulia. No especifíca;Fil: Messa, Piergiorgio. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Ridruejo, Ezequiel. Universidad Austral. Hospital Universitario Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. CEMIC-CONICET. Centro de Educaciones Médicas e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno". CEMIC-CONICET; Argentin

Pegylated interferon (alone or with ribavirin) for chronic hepatitis c in haemodialysis population

Background/Aims: Hepatitis C virus infection remains prevalent among patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis and has a detrimental impact on survival in this population. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients is still a challenge to clinicians. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy with pegylated interferon, alone or combined with ribavirin, for chronic hepatitis C among patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort trial with monotherapy (pegylated interferon) (n=21) or combined antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) (n=5) for chronic hepatitis C in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis. Results: Sustained virological response was obtained in eleven (42%) patients. Seven (26.9%) patients interrupted prematurely the antiviral treatment due to serious side-effects, the most frequent cause of treatment withdrawal being hematological (n=3). HCV RNA load was lower in responder than non-responder patients, 5.44 (3.45; 6.36) vs. 5.86 (4.61; 6.46) log10 copies/mL, even if the difference was not significant (P=0.099). Blood transfusion requirement was greater in patients on combined antiviral therapy than those on pegylated interferon alone, 100% (5/5) vs. 0% (0/21), P=0.0001. No difference in sustained viral response occurred between patients on combined antiviral therapy and those on pegylated interferon monotherapy [40% (2/5) vs. 42.8% (9/21), P=0.90]. Conclusions: Results from this study showed that pegylated interferon alone or with ribavirin is unsatisfactory in terms of efficacy and safety. Prospective trials based on interferon-free regimens (i.e., sofosbuvir plus ribavirin or sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir) are under way in patients with hepatitis C receiving long-term hemodialysis

Vacuna contra el virus de la hepatitis B y la nefropatía crónica: avances

Background: Hepatitis B is an important agent of liver disease in patients with chronic kidney disease and chronic HBV infection promotes the development of CKD in the adult general population. Patients with CKD have a suboptimal response to various vaccines, and it remains unclear how we boost the immune response of CKD patients to HB vaccine. Study aims and design: We performed a narrative review to assess the mechanisms of lower immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD population; multiple approaches to improve the response rate of CKD patients to HBV vaccine have been reported. This is a very important topic for nephrologists who often serve as primary case providers for patients with CKD. Results: The recommended vaccine schedule for CKD patients including those on maintenance dialysis is based on recombinant vaccine, four doses (month 0,1,2, and 6; 40 mcg each) by intramuscular route (deltoid muscle). According to RCTs or observational studies, some recombinant vaccines with adjuvants (i.e., HBV-AS02 and HBV-AS04) look promising. HBV-AS04 showed to give better seroprotection rates and durable immune response over extended follow-ups compared with licensed HBV vaccine in CKD patients. The seroprotection rate was 95% (97/102) and 82% (202/248) in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients, respectively, one month after completing vaccine schedule with HBV-AS04. HBV-AS02 was superior to licensed vaccine in terms of seroprotection rate, 76.9% vs. 37.6%. Conclusions: We suggest adjuvanted recombinant (HBV-AS04) vaccine (0,1,2 and 3 months; 20 mcg each dose) and post vaccination testing of anti-HBs antibody after vaccination. Booster doses to patients whose anti-HBs titers fall below the seroprotection level (<10 IU/mL) during the follow-up are appropriate. The patho-physiologic mechanisms responsible for the poor immunogenicity of HBV vaccine in CKD patients are under active investigation.Fil: Fabrizi, Fabrizio. Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital; ItaliaFil: Cerutti, Roberta. Maggiore Polyclinic Hospital; ItaliaFil: Dixit, Vivek. University of California at Los Angeles. School of Medicine; Estados UnidosFil: Ridruejo, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. CEMIC-CONICET. Centro de Educaciones Médicas e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno". CEMIC-CONICET; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Hospital Universitario Austral; Argentin

Terapia di HCV e insufficienza renale: recenti acquisizioni

Abstract non disponibil

Acute Tubular Necrosis Following Interferon-Based Therapy for Hepatitis C: Case Study with Literature Review

Background/Aims: Interferon treatment of malignant or viral diseases can be accompanied by various side-effects including nephro-toxicity. Methods: We report on a 68-year-old Caucasian male who received dual therapy with pegylated interferon 2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. Results: After three months of antiviral therapy, the patient developed acute kidney failure (serum creatinine up to 6 mg/dL) with mild proteinuria (500 mg daily) and haematuria. Immediate immunosuppressive therapy with high-dose intravenous steroids did not improve kidney function. Kidney biopsy was consistent with acute tubular necrosis without glomerular abnormalities. He started long-term peritoneal dialysis (four regular exchanges) to provide both dialysis adequacy and ascites removal. Kidney function gradually improved over the following months (serum creatinine around 2 mg/dL) and peritoneal dialysis was continued with two exchanges daily. The temporal relationship between the administration of the drug and the occurrence of nephro-toxicity, and the absence of other obvious reasons for acute tubular necrosis support a causative role for pegylated interferon; benefit on kidney disease was noted after withdrawal of antiviral agents. An extensive review of the literature on acute tubular necrosis associated with interferon-based therapy, based on in vitro data and earlier case-reports, has been made. The proposed pathogenic mechanisms are reviewed. Conclusions: Our case emphasizes the importance of monitoring renal function during treatment of chronic hepatitis C with antiviral combination therapy as treatment may precipitate kidney damage at tubular level

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV in mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease

Background and aims: The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents promises to change the management of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a patient group in which the treatment of hepatitis C was historically challenging. We investigated the safety and efficacy of all-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C in a 'real-world' cohort of patients with CKD. Methods: We performed an observational single-arm multi-centre study in a large (n = 198) cohort of patients with stage 1–3 CKD who underwent antiviral therapy with DAAs for the treatment of HCV. The primary end-point was sustained virologic response (serum HCV RNA <15 IU/mL, 12 weeks after treatment ended) (SVR12). We collected data on on-treatment adverse events (AEs), severe AEs, and laboratory abnormalities. Results: The average baseline eGFR (CKD-EPI equation) was 70.06 ± 20.1 mL/min/1.72 m2; the most common genotype was HCV 1b (n = 93, 51%). Advanced liver scarring was found in 58 (46%) patients by transient elastography. Five regimens were adopted: elbasvir/grazoprevir (n = 5), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 4), ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (PrOD) regimen (n = 40), simeprevir ± daclatasvir (n = 2), and sofosbuvir-based combinations (n = 147). The SVR12 rate was 95.4% (95% CI, 93.8%; 96.8%). There were nine virological failures – eight being relapsers. Adverse events occurred in 30% (51/168) of patients, and were managed clinically without discontinuation of therapy or hospitalization. One of the most common AEs was anaemia (n = 12), which required discontinuation or dose reduction of ribavirin in some cases (n = 6); deterioration of kidney function occurred in three (1.7%). Conclusions: All-oral, interferon-free therapy with DAAs for chronic HCV in mild-to-moderate CKD was effective and well-tolerated in a 'real–world' clinical setting. Studies are in progress to address whether sustained viral response translates into better survival in this population. Resumen: Antecedentes y objetivos: La aparición de los antivíricos de acción directa (AAD) promete cambiar el tratamiento de la infección por el virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) en los pacientes con nefropatía crónica (NC), un grupo de pacientes en el que el tratamiento de la hepatitis C siempre supuso una dificultad. Se investiga la seguridad y la eficacia de los antivíricos de acción directa, sin interferones orales, en todos los casos para el tratamiento de la hepatitis C en una cohorte en condiciones reales de pacientes con NC. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio multicéntrico, de un solo grupo y observacional en una cohorte amplia (n = 198) de pacientes con NC en estadio 1-3 a los que se administró tratamiento antivírico con AAD para el VHC. El criterio principal de valoración fue la respuesta virológica sostenida (ARN sérico del VHC < 15 UI/ml, 12 semanas después de la finalización del tratamiento) (RVS12). Se recogieron los datos sobre acontecimientos adversos (AA) surgidos durante el tratamiento, AA graves y anomalías analíticas. Resultados: La FGe inicial media (ecuación de CKD-EPI) fue de 70,06 ± 20,1 ml/min/1,72 m2; el genotipo más frecuente fue VHC 1b (n = 93; 51%). Se observó cicatrización hepática avanzada en 58 (46%) pacientes mediante elastografía transitoria. Se adoptaron 5 pautas: elbasvir/grazoprevir (n = 5), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 4), pauta de paritaprevir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (PrOD) potenciada con ritonavir (n = 40), simeprevir ± daclatasvir (n = 2) y combinaciones basadas en sofosbuvir (n = 147). La tasa de RVS12 fue del 95,4% (IC del 95%: 93,8; 96,8%). Hubo 9 fracasos virológicos, 8 de ellos recidivantes. Se produjeron acontecimientos adversos en el 30% (51/168) de los pacientes, que se trataron clínicamente sin suspensión del tratamiento ni hospitalización. Uno de los AA más frecuentes fue la anemia (n = 12), que precisó la suspensión o la reducción de la dosis de ribavirina en algunos casos (n = 6); se produjo deterioro de la función renal en 3 casos (1,7%). Conclusiones: El tratamiento sin interferón oral en todos los casos con AAD para el VHC crónico en la NC de leve a moderada fue eficaz y bien tolerado en un contexto de la práctica clínica real. Hay estudios en curso para abordar si la respuesta viral sostenida se traduce en una mejor supervivencia en esta población. Keywords: Adverse effects, Antiviral agents, Hepatitis C, Kidney failure, Sustained virologic response, Palabras clave: Efectos adversos, Antivíricos, Hepatitis C, Insuficiencia renal, Respuesta virológica sostenid

The Stimulation of Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase by the Prion Protein Fragment 106–126 in Human Microglia Is Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-dependent and Involves p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase

A synthetic peptide consisting of amino acid residues 106-126 of the human prion protein (PrP-(106--126)) has been previously demonstrated to be neurotoxic and to induce microglial activation. The present study investigated the expression of the inducible form of the nitric-oxide synthase (NOS-II) in human microglial cells treated with PrP-(106--126). Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, we found that PrP-(106--126) induces NOS-II gene expression after 24 h of treatment and that this effect is accompanied by a peak of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) binding at 30 min as evaluated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Since our previous data demonstrated tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) to be a potent inducer of NOS-II in these cells, we analyzed the expression of this cytokine in PrP-(106--126)-treated microglia. PrP-(106--126) caused the release of TNF-alpha as detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and a blocking antibody, anti-TNF-alpha, abolished NOS-II induction elicited by this peptide. Moreover, PrP-(106-126) activates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and the inhibition of this pathway determines the ablation of NF-kappa B binding induced by this fragment peptide