244 research outputs found
Methane and nitrous oxide retrievals from MIPAS-ENVISAT
We present the strongly revised IMK/IAA MIPAS-ENVISAT CH4 and N2O data products for the MIPAS full resolution (versions V5H_CH4_21 and V5H_N2O_21) and for the reduced resolution period (versions V5R_CH4_224, V5R_CH4_225, V5R_N2O_224 and V5R_N2O_225). Differences to older retrieval versions which are known to have a high bias are discussed. The usage of the HITRAN 2008 spectroscopic dataset leads to lower values for both gases in the lower part of the profile. The improved correction of additive radiance offsets and handling of background radiance continua allows for aerosol contributions at altitudes in the upper stratosphere and above. These changes lead to more plausible values both in the radiance offset and in the profiles of the continuum absorption coefficients. They also increase the fraction of converged retrievals. Some minor changes were applied to the constraint of the inverse problem, causing small differences in the retrieved profiles, mostly due to the relaxation of off-diagonal regularisation matrix elements for the calculation of jointly retrieved absorption coefficient profiles. Spectral microwindows have been adjusted to avoid areas with saturated spectral signatures. Jointly retrieving profiles of water vapour and nitric acid serves to compensate spectroscopic inconsistencies. We discuss the averaging kernels of the products and their vertical resolution
Modelling and simulating change in reforesting mountain landscapes using a social-ecological framework
Natural reforestation of European mountain landscapes raises major environmental and societal issues. With local stakeholders in the Pyrenees National Park area (France), we studied agricultural landscape colonisation by ash (Fraxinus excelsior) to enlighten its impacts on biodiversity and other landscape functions of importance for the valley socio-economics. The study comprised an integrated assessment of land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) since the 1950s, and a scenario analysis of alternative future policy. We combined knowledge and methods from landscape ecology, land change and agricultural sciences, and a set of coordinated field studies to capture interactions and feedback in the local landscape/land-use system. Our results elicited the hierarchically-nested relationships between social and ecological processes. Agricultural change played a preeminent role in the spatial and temporal patterns of LUCC. Landscape colonisation by ash at the parcel level of organisation was merely controlled by grassland management, and in fact depended on the farmer's land management at the whole-farm level. LUCC patterns at the landscape level depended to a great extent on interactions between farm household behaviours and the spatial arrangement of landholdings within the landscape mosaic. Our results stressed the need to represent the local SES function at a fine scale to adequately capture scenarios of change in landscape functions. These findings orientated our modelling choices in the building an agent-based model for LUCC simulation (SMASH - Spatialized Multi-Agent System of landscape colonization by ASH). We discuss our method and results with reference to topical issues in interdisciplinary research into the sustainability of multifunctional landscapes
AGFORWARD Third Periodic Report: July 2016 to December 2017
Project context
The European Union has targets to improve the competitiveness of European agriculture and
forestry, whilst improving the environment and the quality of rural life. At the same time there is a
need to improve our resilience to climate change and to enhance biodiversity. During the twentieth
century, large productivity advances were made by managing agriculture and forestry as separate
practices, but often at a high environmental cost. In order to address landscape-scale issues such as
biodiversity and water quality, we argue that farmers and society will benefit from considering landuse
as a continuum including both agriculture and trees, and that there are significant opportunities
for European farmers and society to benefit from a closer integration of trees with agriculture.
Agroforestry is the practice of deliberately integrating woody vegetation (trees or shrubs) with crop
and/or animal systems to benefit from the resulting ecological and economic interactions.AGFORWARD (Grant Agreement N° 613520) is co-funded by the European
Commission, Directorate General for Research & Innovation, within the 7th
Framework Programme of RTD. The views and opinions expressed in this report
are purely those of the writers and may not in any circumstances be regarded as
stating an official position of the European Commissio
AGFORWARD Project Final Report
Executive summary:
The AGFORWARD project (Grant Agreement N° 613520) had the overall goal to promote
agroforestry practices in Europe that will advance sustainable rural development. It had four
objectives (described below) which address 1) the context and extent of agroforestry in Europe, 2)
identifying, developing and field-testing agroforestry innovations through participatory networks,
3) evaluating innovative designs and practices at field-, farm-, and landscape-scales, and promoting
agroforestry in Europe through policy development and dissemination. Agroforestry is defined as
the practice of deliberately integrating woody vegetation (trees or shrubs) with crop and/or animal
systems to benefit from the resulting ecological and economic interactions.
Context: European agroforestry has been estimated to cover 10.6 Mha (using a literature review)
and 15.4 Mha using the pan-European LUCAS dataset (i.e. 8.8% of the utilised agricultural area).
Livestock agroforestry (15.1 Mha) is, by far, the dominant type of agroforestry. The LUCAS analysis
provides a uniform method to compare agroforestry areas between countries and over time.
Identify, develop and field-test agroforestry innovations: 40 stakeholder groups (involving about
820 stakeholders across 13 European countries) developed and field-tested agroforestry innovations
which have been reported in 40 “lesson learnt” reports, and in a user-friendly format in 46
“Agroforestry innovation leaflets”. The innovations for agroforestry systems of high nature and
cultural value included cheaper methods of tree protection and guidance for establishing legumes in
wood pastures. Innovations for agroforestry with timber plantations, olive groves and apple
orchards include the use of medicinal plants and reduction of mowing costs. Innovations for
integrating trees on arable farms included assessments of yield benefits by providing wind
protection. Innovations for livestock farms included using trees to enhance animal welfare, shade
protection, and as a source of fodder. Peer-reviewed journal papers and conference presentations
on these and other related topics were developed.
Evaluation of agroforestry designs and practices at field- and landscape-scale: a range of publicly
available field-scale analysis tools are available on the AGFORWARD website. These include the
“CliPick” climate database, and web-applications of the Farm-SAFE and Hi-sAFe model. The results
of field- and landscape-scale analysis, written up as peer-reviewed papers, highlight the benefits of
agroforestry (relative to agriculture) for biodiversity enhancement and providing regulating
ecosystem services, such as for climate and water regulation and purification.
Policy development and dissemination: detailed reviews of existing policy and recommendations
for future European agroforestry policy have been produced. The support provided is far wider than
the single specified agroforestry measures. The recommendations included the collation of existing
measures, and that agroforestry systems should not forfeit Pillar I payments. Opportunities for farmlevel
and landscape-level measures were also identified. The project results can be found on the
project website (www.agforward.eu), a Facebook account (www.facebook.com/AgforwardProject),
a Twitter account (https://twitter.com/AGFORWARD_EU), and a quarterly electronic newsletter
(http://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/newsletters-1514.html). The number of national
associations in Europe was extended to twelve, and a web-based training resource on agroforestry
(http://train.agforward.eu/language/en/agforall/) created. AGFORWARD also supported the Third
European Agroforestry Conference in Montpellier in 2016 attracting 287 delegates from 26 countries
including many farmers. We also initiated another 21 national conferences or conference sessions
on agroforestry, made about 240 oral presentations, 61 poster presentations, produced about 50
news articles, and supported about 87 workshop, training or field-visit activities (in addition to the
stakeholder groups)
Validation of MIPAS IMK/IAA methane profiles
The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) is an infrared (IR) limb emission spectrometer on the Envisat platform. It measures trace gas distributions during day and night, pole-to-pole, over an altitude range from 6 to 70 km in nominal mode and up to 170 km in special modes, depending on the measurement mode, producing more than 1000 profiles day-1. We present the results of a validation study of methane, version V5R-CH4-222, retrieved with the IMK/IAA (Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Karlsruhe/Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia, Grenada) MIPAS scientific level 2 processor. The level 1 spectra are provided by the ESA (European Space Agency) and version 5 was used. The time period covered is 2005-2012, which corresponds to the period when MIPAS measured trace gas distributions at a reduced spectral resolution of 0.0625 cm-1. The comparison with satellite instruments includes the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), the HALogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE), the Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment (SOFIE) and the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY). Furthermore, comparisons with MkIV balloon-borne solar occultation measurements and with air sampling measurements performed by the University of Frankfurt are presented. The validation activities include bias determination, assessment of stability, precision validation, analysis of histograms and comparison of corresponding climatologies. Above 50 km altitude, MIPAS methane mixing ratios agree within 3 % with ACE-FTS and SOFIE. Between 30 and 40 km an agreement within 3 % with SCIAMACHY has been found. In the middle stratosphere, there is no clear indication of a MIPAS bias since comparisons with various instruments contradict each other. In the lower stratosphere (below 25 km) MIPAS CH4 is biased high with respect to satellite instruments, and the most likely estimate of this bias is 14 %. However, in the comparison with CH4 data obtained from cryogenic whole-air sampler (cryosampler) measurements, there is no evidence of a high bias in MIPAS between 20 and 25 km altitude. Precision validation is performed on collocated MIPAS-MIPAS pairs and suggests a slight underestimation of its uncertainties by a factor of 1.2. No significant evidence of an instrumental drift has been found. © Author(s) 2015
Identifying and explaining the farming system composition of agricultural landscapes: The role of socioeconomic drivers under strong biophysical gradients
In mountain landscapes, agricultural abandonment is taking place in the most vulnerable areas, while intensification increases in the most productive lands. These
contrasting processes, which have different impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), are related to changes in the farming system component of these
landscapes.
Farming systems are identified based on farmer’s decisions on, for example, type of crop and level of fertilizers, which represent the descriptors of farming systems
and can be grouped into several dimensions (e.g. land use and intensity). Since obtaining this data at farm-level is often difficult, an alternative is to study the spatial
combinations of farming systems at parish-level, i.e., Farming System Mixes (FSM), relying on agricultural census data.
Other biophysical (e.g. climate, soil) and socioeconomic (e.g. labour, farmer’s age) variables, independent of farmers' decisions, represent the exogenous drivers of
these decisions. The separation between descriptors and drivers is important to improve knowledge about what drives farmers' decisions regarding farming system
choice, as these choices are often the focus of policies aiming the support of BES.
In this study, we explored the underlying drivers of FSM and assessed the role of socioeconomic drivers, main target for policy makers, in a context of strong
biophysical gradients. Biophysical drivers emerge as those that primarily discriminate between the FSM located in different topographic positions (valleys, mountains
and plateau). In the situations where there is a greater range of productive choices available for farmers, such as in valleys, socioeconomic drivers assume a
preponderant role on farming system choiceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Status and Trends of Land Degradation and Restoration and Associated Changes in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions
A New Pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea: Azhdarchidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Morocco
The Kem Kem beds in South Eastern Morocco contain a rich early Upper (or possibly late Lower) Cretaceous vertebrate assemblage. Fragmentary remains, predominantly teeth and jaw tips, represent several kinds of pterosaur although only one species, the ornithocheirid Coloborhynchus moroccensis, has been named. Here, we describe a new azhdarchid pterosaur, Alanqa saharica nov. gen. nov. sp., based on an almost complete well preserved mandibular symphysis from Aferdou N'Chaft. We assign additional fragmentary jaw remains, some of which have been tentatively identified as azhdarchid and pteranodontid, to this new taxon which is distinguished from other azhdarchids by a remarkably straight, elongate, lance-shaped mandibular symphysis that bears a pronounced dorsal eminence near the posterior end of its dorsal (occlusal) surface. Most remains, including the holotype, represent individuals of approximately three to four meters in wingspan, but a fragment of a large cervical vertebra, that probably also belongs to A. saharica, suggests that wingspans of six meters were achieved in this species. The Kem Kem beds have yielded the most diverse pterosaur assemblage yet reported from Africa and provide the first clear evidence for the presence of azhdarchids in Gondwana at the start of the Late Cretaceous. This, the relatively large size achieved by Alanqa, and the additional evidence of variable jaw morphology in azhdarchids provided by this taxon, indicates a longer and more complex history for this clade than previously suspected
- …