Anorexia Nervosa: Striving for Control

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is an eating disorder characterized by severely low bodyweight, fear of weight-gain, and a subjective believe to be “fat”. An elevated need for control and fear of losing control are considered core aspects in the development and maintenance of AN and restricting food intake is thought to function as a means to gain feelings of control (Fairburn, Shafran, & Cooper, 1999; Schmidt & Treasure, 2006). Feelings of inefficiency (i.e. lack of control regarding personal goals) have been found to predict longer duration of treatment and worse treatment outcome, underlining the relevance of the need for control in AN (Olatunji, Levinson, & Calebs, 2018; Pinto, Heinberg, Coughlin, Fava, & Guarda, 2008; Surgenor, Maguire, Russell, & Touyz, 2007). The constant striving for control could lead to rumination and negative affect – two further important symptoms associated with AN. The Goal Progress Theory of rumination (GPT; Carver & Scheier, 1990; Martin & Tesser, 1996) proposes that perceived discrepancies between desired goals (in the case of AN e.g. goals regarding lowest possible calorie intake, weight, etc.) and the current state (in the case of AN e.g. the subjective conviction of having eaten or weighing too much) trigger ruminative thoughts, which subsequently lead to negative affect. Following this theory, it could be suggested that gaining feelings of goal-progress and control could lessen the burdening repetitive thoughts and negative affect and that individuals with AN try to achieve this by restricting food intake. This dietary restriction requires self-control. However, previous research has shown that patients with AN typically not only show such elevated self-control, but also display rigid habitual behaviours and routines, struggle with set-shifting, and often display comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Treasure & Schmidt, 2013; Halmi et al., 2003). This raises the question of whether food restriction in AN is indeed an act of self-control or rather a habit. Recent scientific development has challenged the traditional dichotomy between controlled and automatic processes (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977), instead suggesting that they are intertwined in such a way that often self-control works via the establishment of goal-serving habits and routines (Gillebaart & de Ridder, 2015; Galla & Duckworth, 2015). These theoretical considerations can generally draw support from previous research, but have not been investigated explicitly in the context of AN. It was the main goal of this thesis to analyse associations between feelings of inefficiency, rumination and negative affect, controlled and habitual behaviour, and eating behaviour to establish an empirical foundation for the proposed relationships between these aspects of AN. Study 1 (Fürtjes, Seidel, et al., 2020) employed ecological momentary assessment (EMA; data collection several times a day over a period of several days in the natural environment of the participants) to investigate associations between feelings of inefficiency, rumination, and affect in a sample of individuals with a history of AN who had recovered from the disorder in terms of eating behaviour and bodyweight and age-matched healthy control participants (HC). AN participants displayed elevated rumination about bodyweight/figure (but not food) and negative affect compared to HC, suggesting that these cognitive-affective symptoms are persistent even after recovery. Analyses investigating associations with inefficiency showed that inefficiency was associated with heightened rumination and negative affect, which is in line with the GPT. Furthermore, AN participants showed higher levels of inefficiency than HC and stronger associations between rumination and negative affect. These findings indicate that feelings of lack of goal-progress and control are a central aspect of AN, likely contributing to maintenance of the disorder by triggering dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes. The fact that these associations were still present in a sample of recovered individuals underlines the persistence of these processes, suggesting that they might not only maintain the disorder but could also present a vulnerability factor or contribute to risk of relapse. Study 2 (Fürtjes et al., 2018) made use of EMA and leptin, an endocrinological marker of undernutrition, to further investigate associations between rumination and affect in a sample of patients with acute AN, once at the beginning of treatment and again after weight-restoration. In line with Study 1, results confirmed that rumination about bodyweight/figure and negative affect are closely linked in AN and that this association persists even after weight-gain. Thoughts about food on the other hand were associated with leptin levels, declined with weight-gain, and showed weaker associations with affect. This suggests that thoughts about food may reflect a physiological symptom of the disorder, connected to undernourishment, whereas thoughts about bodyweight/figure might present a cognitive-affective symptom which could be involved in maintenance of the disorder (as suggested by Study 1). To test supporting evidence for the interaction of self-control and habits in the regulation of eating behaviour, Study 3 (Fürtjes, King, et al., 2020) employed task-based measures of controlled and automatic processing as well as self-report measures of self-control, habitual behaviour, and eating behaviour in a large female sample representative of the general population through an online study design. Results obtained via structural equation modelling (SEM) revealed that eating behaviour appears to be largely guided by habits and automatic behavioural tendencies, whereas controlled aspects have an indirect influence via this association. These findings could be interpreted as support for the proposal that self-control might work via the establishment of goal-serving habits and routines, which outlines the possibility that the restrictive eating behaviour in AN might be achieved and maintained via a combination of self-control and rigid routines and habits. Taken together, the research presented in this thesis was able to demonstrate how striving for control as a core aspect of AN might play a role in triggering dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes, likely contributing to development and maintenance of the disorder, and that self-control and habitual behaviour interact inguiding human eating behaviour, carrying implications for the mechanisms behind restrictive eating in AN. Clinical implications that can be derived from this research include addressing need for control and feelings of inefficiency in therapy to enable improvement of dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes as well as eating behaviour

Automatic and Controlled Processing: Implications for Eating Behavior

It is a widely held view that humans have control over their food choices and consumption. However, research also suggests that eating behavior is often triggered by contextual cues and guided by automaticities and habits. Interestingly, the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processing has recently been challenged, suggesting that they may be intertwined. In a large female sample (n = 567), we investigated the hypothesis that task-based and self-reported measures of automatic and controlled processing would interact and impact self-reported eating behavior. Results analyzed via structural equation modeling suggest that automatic, but not controlled processing, during a modified flanker task, including a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) manipulation, was inversely associated with self-reported self-control. The influence of self-control on unhealthy eating behavior (i.e., uncontrolled and emotional eating, heightened consumption of fat and sugar) was only indirect via habitual behavior, which itself had a strong direct impact. Unhealthy eating was further associated with real-life outcomes (e.g., body mass index (BMI)). Our findings suggest that eating behavior may indeed be guided primarily by automaticities and habits, whereas self-control might facilitate this association. Having self-control over eating might therefore be most effective by avoiding contextual cues eliciting undesired automatic behavior and establishing habits that serve long-term goals

Automatic and Controlled Processing : Implications for Eating Behavior

It is a widely held view that humans have control over their food choices and consumption. However, research also suggests that eating behavior is often triggered by contextual cues and guided by automaticities and habits. Interestingly, the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processing has recently been challenged, suggesting that they may be intertwined. In a large female sample (n = 567), we investigated the hypothesis that task-based and self-reported measures of automatic and controlled processing would interact and impact self-reported eating behavior. Results analyzed via structural equation modeling suggest that automatic, but not controlled processing, during a modified flanker task, including a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) manipulation, was inversely associated with self-reported self-control. The influence of self-control on unhealthy eating behavior (i.e., uncontrolled and emotional eating, heightened consumption of fat and sugar) was only indirect via habitual behavior, which itself had a strong direct impact. Unhealthy eating was further associated with real-life outcomes (e.g., body mass index (BMI)). Our findings suggest that eating behavior may indeed be guided primarily by automaticities and habits, whereas self-control might facilitate this association. Having self-control over eating might therefore be most effective by avoiding contextual cues eliciting undesired automatic behavior and establishing habits that serve long-term goals.Peer reviewe

Anorexia Nervosa: Striving for Control

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is an eating disorder characterized by severely low bodyweight, fear of weight-gain, and a subjective believe to be “fat”. An elevated need for control and fear of losing control are considered core aspects in the development and maintenance of AN and restricting food intake is thought to function as a means to gain feelings of control (Fairburn, Shafran, & Cooper, 1999; Schmidt & Treasure, 2006). Feelings of inefficiency (i.e. lack of control regarding personal goals) have been found to predict longer duration of treatment and worse treatment outcome, underlining the relevance of the need for control in AN (Olatunji, Levinson, & Calebs, 2018; Pinto, Heinberg, Coughlin, Fava, & Guarda, 2008; Surgenor, Maguire, Russell, & Touyz, 2007). The constant striving for control could lead to rumination and negative affect – two further important symptoms associated with AN. The Goal Progress Theory of rumination (GPT; Carver & Scheier, 1990; Martin & Tesser, 1996) proposes that perceived discrepancies between desired goals (in the case of AN e.g. goals regarding lowest possible calorie intake, weight, etc.) and the current state (in the case of AN e.g. the subjective conviction of having eaten or weighing too much) trigger ruminative thoughts, which subsequently lead to negative affect. Following this theory, it could be suggested that gaining feelings of goal-progress and control could lessen the burdening repetitive thoughts and negative affect and that individuals with AN try to achieve this by restricting food intake. This dietary restriction requires self-control. However, previous research has shown that patients with AN typically not only show such elevated self-control, but also display rigid habitual behaviours and routines, struggle with set-shifting, and often display comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Treasure & Schmidt, 2013; Halmi et al., 2003). This raises the question of whether food restriction in AN is indeed an act of self-control or rather a habit. Recent scientific development has challenged the traditional dichotomy between controlled and automatic processes (Shiffrin & Schneider, 1977), instead suggesting that they are intertwined in such a way that often self-control works via the establishment of goal-serving habits and routines (Gillebaart & de Ridder, 2015; Galla & Duckworth, 2015). These theoretical considerations can generally draw support from previous research, but have not been investigated explicitly in the context of AN. It was the main goal of this thesis to analyse associations between feelings of inefficiency, rumination and negative affect, controlled and habitual behaviour, and eating behaviour to establish an empirical foundation for the proposed relationships between these aspects of AN. Study 1 (Fürtjes, Seidel, et al., 2020) employed ecological momentary assessment (EMA; data collection several times a day over a period of several days in the natural environment of the participants) to investigate associations between feelings of inefficiency, rumination, and affect in a sample of individuals with a history of AN who had recovered from the disorder in terms of eating behaviour and bodyweight and age-matched healthy control participants (HC). AN participants displayed elevated rumination about bodyweight/figure (but not food) and negative affect compared to HC, suggesting that these cognitive-affective symptoms are persistent even after recovery. Analyses investigating associations with inefficiency showed that inefficiency was associated with heightened rumination and negative affect, which is in line with the GPT. Furthermore, AN participants showed higher levels of inefficiency than HC and stronger associations between rumination and negative affect. These findings indicate that feelings of lack of goal-progress and control are a central aspect of AN, likely contributing to maintenance of the disorder by triggering dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes. The fact that these associations were still present in a sample of recovered individuals underlines the persistence of these processes, suggesting that they might not only maintain the disorder but could also present a vulnerability factor or contribute to risk of relapse. Study 2 (Fürtjes et al., 2018) made use of EMA and leptin, an endocrinological marker of undernutrition, to further investigate associations between rumination and affect in a sample of patients with acute AN, once at the beginning of treatment and again after weight-restoration. In line with Study 1, results confirmed that rumination about bodyweight/figure and negative affect are closely linked in AN and that this association persists even after weight-gain. Thoughts about food on the other hand were associated with leptin levels, declined with weight-gain, and showed weaker associations with affect. This suggests that thoughts about food may reflect a physiological symptom of the disorder, connected to undernourishment, whereas thoughts about bodyweight/figure might present a cognitive-affective symptom which could be involved in maintenance of the disorder (as suggested by Study 1). To test supporting evidence for the interaction of self-control and habits in the regulation of eating behaviour, Study 3 (Fürtjes, King, et al., 2020) employed task-based measures of controlled and automatic processing as well as self-report measures of self-control, habitual behaviour, and eating behaviour in a large female sample representative of the general population through an online study design. Results obtained via structural equation modelling (SEM) revealed that eating behaviour appears to be largely guided by habits and automatic behavioural tendencies, whereas controlled aspects have an indirect influence via this association. These findings could be interpreted as support for the proposal that self-control might work via the establishment of goal-serving habits and routines, which outlines the possibility that the restrictive eating behaviour in AN might be achieved and maintained via a combination of self-control and rigid routines and habits. Taken together, the research presented in this thesis was able to demonstrate how striving for control as a core aspect of AN might play a role in triggering dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes, likely contributing to development and maintenance of the disorder, and that self-control and habitual behaviour interact inguiding human eating behaviour, carrying implications for the mechanisms behind restrictive eating in AN. Clinical implications that can be derived from this research include addressing need for control and feelings of inefficiency in therapy to enable improvement of dysfunctional cognitive-affective processes as well as eating behaviour

Automatic and Controlled Processing: Implications for Eating Behavior

It is a widely held view that humans have control over their food choices and consumption. However, research also suggests that eating behavior is often triggered by contextual cues and guided by automaticities and habits. Interestingly, the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processing has recently been challenged, suggesting that they may be intertwined. In a large female sample (n = 567), we investigated the hypothesis that task-based and self-reported measures of automatic and controlled processing would interact and impact self-reported eating behavior. Results analyzed via structural equation modeling suggest that automatic, but not controlled processing, during a modified flanker task, including a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) manipulation, was inversely associated with self-reported self-control. The influence of self-control on unhealthy eating behavior (i.e., uncontrolled and emotional eating, heightened consumption of fat and sugar) was only indirect via habitual behavior, which itself had a strong direct impact. Unhealthy eating was further associated with real-life outcomes (e.g., body mass index (BMI)). Our findings suggest that eating behavior may indeed be guided primarily by automaticities and habits, whereas self-control might facilitate this association. Having self-control over eating might therefore be most effective by avoiding contextual cues eliciting undesired automatic behavior and establishing habits that serve long-term goals

Automatic and Controlled Processing: Implications for Eating Behavior

It is a widely held view that humans have control over their food choices and consumption. However, research also suggests that eating behavior is often triggered by contextual cues and guided by automaticities and habits. Interestingly, the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processing has recently been challenged, suggesting that they may be intertwined. In a large female sample (n = 567), we investigated the hypothesis that task-based and self-reported measures of automatic and controlled processing would interact and impact self-reported eating behavior. Results analyzed via structural equation modeling suggest that automatic, but not controlled processing, during a modified flanker task, including a context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) manipulation, was inversely associated with self-reported self-control. The influence of self-control on unhealthy eating behavior (i.e., uncontrolled and emotional eating, heightened consumption of fat and sugar) was only indirect via habitual behavior, which itself had a strong direct impact. Unhealthy eating was further associated with real-life outcomes (e.g., body mass index (BMI)). Our findings suggest that eating behavior may indeed be guided primarily by automaticities and habits, whereas self-control might facilitate this association. Having self-control over eating might therefore be most effective by avoiding contextual cues eliciting undesired automatic behavior and establishing habits that serve long-term goals

Increased Habit Frequency in the Daily Lives of Patients with Acute Anorexia Nervosa

Strict eating routines and frequent rigid behavior patterns are commonly observed in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). A recent theory proposes that while these behaviors may have been reinforced initially, they later become habitual. To date, however, research has been overly focused on eating-disorder (ED)-related habits. Over the course of seven days, we applied an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to investigate the habit frequency and strength of ED-specific (food intake) and ED-unspecific (hygiene) habits in the daily lives of a sample of n = 57 AN and n = 57 healthy controls (HC). The results of the hierarchical models revealed that habits were significantly more likely in patients compared with HC for both categories, independently. Furthermore, a lower body mass index (BMI) was associated with increased habit frequency in AN. Our study strengthens the habit theory of AN by showing the relevance of habits beyond ED-specific behavioral domains. This also supports the development of innovative therapeutic interventions targeting habitual behavior in EDs

Real-life self-control conflicts in anorexia nervosa: An ecological momentary assessment investigation

Background. Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) are often thought to show heightened selfcontrol and increased ability to inhibit desires. In addition to inhibitory self-control, antecedentfocused strategies (e.g., cognitive reconstrual—the re-evaluation of tempting situations) might contribute to disorder maintenance and enable disorder-typical, maladaptive behaviors. - Methods. Over a period of 14 days, 40 acutely underweight young female patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and 40 healthy control (HC) participants reported their affect and behavior in selfcontrol situations via ecological momentary assessment during inpatient treatment (AN) and everyday life (HC). Data were analyzed via hierarchical analyses (linear and logistic modeling). - Results. Conflict strength had a significantly lower impact on self-control success in AN compared to HC. While AN and HC did not generally differ in the number or strength of self-control conflicts or in the percentage of self-control success, AN reported self-controlled behavior to be less dependent on conflict strength. - Conclusions. While patients with AN were not generally more successful at self-control, they appeared to resolve self-control conflicts more effectively. These findings suggest that the magnitude of self-control conflicts has comparatively little impact on individuals with AN, possibly due to the use of antecedent-focused strategies. If confirmed, cognitive-behavioral therapy might focus on and help patients to exploit these alternative self-control strategies in the battle against their illness

The costs of over-control in anorexia nervosa:evidence from fMRI and ecological momentary assessment

A growing body of evidence suggests that a high level of self-control may, despite its positive effects, influence cognitive processing in an unfavorable manner. However, the affective costs of self-control have only rarely been investigated. Anorexia nervosa (AN) is an eating disorder that is often characterized by excessive self-control. Here, we used fMRI to explore whether over-control in AN may have negative affective consequences. 36 predominantly adolescent female AN patients and 36 age-matched healthy controls (HC) viewed negative and neutral pictures during two separate fMRI sessions before and after 10 min of rest. We tested whether abnormally elevated neural activity during the initial presentation in a brain region broadly implicated in top-down control, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), could predict subsequent activation in limbic areas relevant to bottom-up affective processing. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), we also tested for associations between the aforementioned neuroimaging markers and negative affective states in the two weeks following the experiment. fMRI data revealed that higher initial activation of the dlPFC in AN predicted increased amygdala reactivity during the second fMRI session, which in turn was related to increased self-reported tension during two weeks following the scan. These data suggest that over-control in AN patients may come at a cost including negative affective states on a short (minutes) as well as a longer time scale (days). This mechanism may significantly contribute to the persistence of AN