28 research outputs found

    Risks of nonchromosomal birth defects, small-for-gestational age birthweight, and prematurity with in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception versus at birth

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: Excess embryos transferred (ET) (> plurality at birth) and fetal heartbeats (FHB) at 6 weeks' gestation are associated with reductions in birthweight and gestation, but prior studies have been limited by small sample sizes and limited IVF data. This analysis evaluated associations between excess ET, excess FHB, and adverse perinatal outcomes, including the risk of nonchromosomal birth defects. METHODS: Live births conceived via IVF from Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Texas included 138,435 children born 2004-2013 (Texas), 2004-2016 (Massachusetts and North Carolina), and 2004-2017 (New York) were classified by ET and FHB. Major birth defects were reported by statewide registries within the first year of life. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% CIs of the risks of a major nonchromosomal birth defect, small-for-gestational age birthweight (SGA), low birthweight (LBW), and preterm birth (≤36 weeks), by excess ET, and excess ET + excess FHB, by plurality at birth (singletons and twins). RESULTS: In singletons with [2 ET, FHB =1] and [≥3 ET, FHB=1], risks [AOR (95% CI)] were increased, respectively, for major nonchromosomal birth defects [1.13 (1.00-1.27) and 1.18 (1.00-1.38)], SGA [1.10 (1.03-1.17) and 1.15 (1.05-1.26)], LBW [1.09 (1.02-1.13) and 1.17 (1.07-1.27)], and preterm birth [1.06 (1.00-1.12) and 1.14 (1.06-1.23)]. With excess ET + excess FHB, risks of all adverse outcomes except major nonchromosomal birth defects increased further for both singletons and twins. CONCLUSION: Excess embryos transferred are associated with increased risks for nonchromosomal birth defects, reduced birthweight, and prematurity in IVF-conceived births

    Design and feasibility testing of a novel group intervention for young women who binge drink in groups

    Get PDF
    BackgroundYoung women frequently drink alcohol in groups and binge drinking within these natural drinking groups is common. This study describes the design of a theoretically and empirically based group intervention to reduce binge drinking among young women. It also evaluates their engagement with the intervention and the acceptability of the study methods.MethodsFriendship groups of women aged 18–35 years, who had two or more episodes of binge drinking (>6 UK units on one occasion; 48g of alcohol) in the previous 30 days, were recruited from the community. A face-to-face group intervention, based on the Health Action Process Approach, was delivered over three sessions. Components of the intervention were woven around fun activities, such as making alcohol free cocktails. Women were followed up four months after the intervention was delivered. Results The target of 24 groups (comprising 97 women) was recruited. The common pattern of drinking was infrequent, heavy drinking (mean consumption on the heaviest drinking day was UK 18.1 units). Process evaluation revealed that the intervention was delivered with high fidelity and acceptability of the study methods was high. The women engaged positively with intervention components and made group decisions about cutting down. Twenty two groups set goals to reduce their drinking, and these were translated into action plans. Retention of individuals at follow up was 87%.ConclusionsThis study successfully recruited groups of young women whose patterns of drinking place them at high risk of acute harm. This novel approach to delivering an alcohol intervention has potential to reduce binge drinking among young women. The high levels of engagement with key steps in the behavior change process suggests that the group intervention should be tested in a full randomised controlled trial

    Attitudes and behaviour predict women's intention to drink alcohol during pregnancy: the challenge for health professionals

    Get PDF
    Background. To explore women's alcohol consumption in pregnancy, and potential predictors of alcohol consumption in pregnancy including: demographic characteristics; and women's knowledge and attitudes regarding alcohol consumption in pregnancy and its effects on the fetus. Methods. We conducted a national cross-sectional survey via computer assisted telephone interview of 1103 Australian women aged 18 to 45 years. Participants were randomly selected from the Electronic White Pages. Pregnant women were not eligible to participate. Quotas were set for age groups and a minimum of 100 participants per state to ensure a national sample reflecting the population. The questionnaire was based on a Health Canada survey with additional questions constructed by the investigators. Descriptive statistics were calculated and logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations of alcohol consumption in pregnancy with participants' characteristics, knowledge and attitudes.Results. The majority of women (89.4%) had consumed alcohol in the last 12 months. During their last pregnancy (n = 700), 34.1% drank alcohol. When asked what they would do if planning a pregnancy (n = 1103), 31.6% said they would consume alcohol and 4.8% would smoke. Intention to consume alcohol in a future pregnancy was associated with: alcohol use in the last pregnancy (adjusted OR (aOR) 43.9; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 27.0 to 71.4); neutral or positive attitudes towards alcohol use in pregnancy (aOR 5.1; 95% CI 3.6 to 7.1); intention to smoke in a future pregnancy (aOR 4.7; 95% CI 2.5 to 9.0); and more frequent and higher current alcohol consumption. Conclusions. Women's past pregnancy and current drinking behaviour, and attitudes to alcohol use in pregnancy were the strongest predictors of alcohol consumption in pregnancy. Targeted interventions for women at higher risk of alcohol consumption in pregnancy are needed to change women's risk perception and behaviour

    Universal Alcohol/Drug Screening in Prenatal Care: A Strategy for Reducing Racial Disparities? Questioning the Assumptions

    Get PDF
    Agencies and organizations promoting universal screening for alcohol and drug use in prenatal care argue that universal screening will reduce White versus Black racial disparities in reporting to Child Protective Services (CPS) at delivery. Yet, no published research has assessed the impact of universal screening on reporting disparities or explored plausible mechanisms. This review defines two potential mechanisms: Equitable Surveillance and Effective Treatment and identifies assumptions underlying each mechanism. It reviews published literature relating to each assumption. Research relating to assumptions underlying each mechanism is primarily inconclusive or contradictory. Thus, available research does not support the claim that universal screening for alcohol and drug use in prenatal care reduces racial disparities in CPS reporting at delivery. Reducing these reporting disparities requires more than universal screening

    Consumo abusivo de álcool em mulheres

    No full text
    Este estudo descritivo, exploratório, objetivou caracterizar as mulheres atendidas em um Hospital de Ensino do Noroeste do Paraná, por abuso de álcool, nos anos de 1999 a 2008, segundo variáveis sociodemográficas e dados da intoxicação. Dos 823 atendimentos, a faixa etária mais frequente foi dos 20 aos 49 anos (58,32%). 13 (1,58%) mulheres estavam grávidas; 12,5% apresentavam de 9 a 12 anos de estudo. Os destilados foram a principal bebida utilizada, e a ingestão foi mais prevalente no período noturno. Cerca de 156 (18,96%) mulheres necessitaram de internamento hospitalar. Evasão hospitalar foi observada em 8,5% dos casos. Conclui-se que a população feminina representa um subgrupo da população suscetível ao abuso do álcool, e, com o perfil descrito neste estudo, foi possível descrever as áreas de impacto na saúde da mulher, possibilitando a implementação de medidas preventivas para diminuir a ocorrência, as complicações e a reincidência nessa população.

    The Risks of Birth Defects and Childhood Cancer With Conception by Assisted Reproductive Technology

    No full text
    As the proportion of births conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) continues to increase, a growing body of literature continues to examine the risks involved such as the higher risk of birth defects. Recently, several studies have suggested that ART-conceived children may have a greater risk of childhood cancer. This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of childhood cancer as a function of birth defect status and method of conception. Data were obtained from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, birth certificates (2004–2013), birth defect registries, and cancer registries in 4 states. The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System contains comprehensive information on ART procedures from 86% of all clinics and more than 92% of all ART cycles in the United States. Assisted reproductive technology cycles reported from January 2004 to December 2017 that resulted in live births were included in this study. For each ART-conceived delivery, the subsequent 10 deliveries were selected as the non-ART comparison group, and siblings of each ART birth were selected as the ART sibling group. The ART group was divided into 4 subgroups based on the combination of oocyte source (autologous or donor) and embryo state (fresh or thawed). A host of independent variables with established associations on birth defects, cancer, and/or ART were selected a priori for inclusion in statistical models. The total study population included 165,125 ART-conceived children, 31,524 non-ART siblings, 12,451 children born as a result of infertility treatment without ART (ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination [OI/IUI]), and 1,353,440 naturally conceived children. A total of 29,571 singleton children (2.0%) and 3753 twin children (3.5%) had a major birth defect. Compared with naturally conceived children, risks for defects were increased for all other groups for nonchromosomal (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] ranged from 1.20 to 1.24, except for donor-fresh), blastogenesis (AORs, 1.22–1.74), cardiovascular (AORs, 1.04–1.26), gastrointestinal (AORs, 1.28–2.01), musculoskeletal (AORs, 1.10–1.48), and genitourinary among male children (AORs, 1.15–1.40, except for donor-fresh). Orofacial defects were increased in the OI/IUI and autologous-fresh and autologous-thawed groups (AORs, 1.26–1.42). The risk of any cancer was increased among ART autologous-fresh and non-ART siblings (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.31 and 1.34, respectively). A total of 127 children had both birth defects and cancer, with 53 (42%) of these children having leukemia. A Cox proportional hazards regression model identified 2 components for the risk of cancer: method of conception and type and number of birth defects. The presence of chromosomal defects was strongly associated with cancer risk (HRs, 8.70 for all cancers and 21.90 for leukemia), and this was further increased in the presence of both chromosomal and nonchromosomal defects (HRs, 21.29 for all cancers, 64.83 for leukemia, and 4.71 for embryonal tumors). The results of this study demonstrate that compared with naturally conceived children a significantly increased risk of nonchromosomal birth defects was found among children conceived with infertility treatment and that the risk of cancer was increased by greater than 30% among non-ART siblings and ART children born from autologous-fresh cycles. Among both naturally conceived and ART-conceived children, the presence of birth defects was associated with a greater risk of cancer
    corecore