29 research outputs found

    Online peer support training to promote adolescents’ emotional support skills, mental health and agency during COVID-19: Randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation

    No full text
    Adolescents often look to their peers for emotional support, so it is critical that they are prepared to take on a supportive role, especially during a health crisis. Using a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN99248812, 28/05/2020), we tested the short-term efficacy of an online training programme to equip young people with skills to support to their peers’ mental wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. In June 2020, one-hundred UK adolescents (aged 16–18) recruited through social media were randomly allocated (1:1) to immediate 5-day peer support training or a wait-list, via an independently generated allocation sequence. Primary outcomes were indicators of ability to help others (motivation, perceived skills, frequency of help provided, compassion to others and connectedness to peers). Secondary outcomes included emotional symptoms, mental wellbeing, and indicators of agency (civic engagement and self-efficacy). We also collected qualitative reports of participants’ experience. Assessments were completed at baseline and 1 week post randomisation (primary endpoint), and up to 4 weeks post randomisation (training group only). The training increased support-giving skills, frequency of providing support, compassion and peer connectedness (medium–large-effect sizes), but not motivation to provide support, 1 week post randomisation, compared to controls. Gains in the training group were maintained 4 weeks post randomisation. Training also improved adolescents’ mental health and agency, and qualitative reports revealed further positive outcomes including increased self-care and empowerment. Leveraging digital platforms that are familiar to young people, peer support training has the potential to enable adolescents to support their own and their peers’ mental wellbeing during a health crisis

    Assessment of Atherosclerosis in Chronic Granulomatous Disease

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patients with Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) suffer immunodeficiency due to defects in the phagocyte NADPH oxidase (NOX2) and concomitant reduction in reactive oxygen intermediates. This may result in a reduction in atherosclerotic injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, biomarkers of inflammation and neutrophil activation, and the presence of MRI and CT quantified subclinical atherosclerosis in the carotid and coronary arteries of 41 CGD patients and 25 healthy controls in the same age range. Uni- and multivariable associations between risk factors, inflammatory markers and atherosclerosis burden were assessed. CGD patients had significant elevations in traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers compared with controls, including; hypertension, hsCRP, oxidized LDL, and low HDL. Despite this, CGD patients had a 22% lower internal carotid artery wall volume compared with controls (361.3 ± 76.4 mm(3) vs. 463.5 ± 104.7 mm(3), p<0.001). This difference was comparable in p47(phox) and gp91(phox) deficient subtypes of CGD, and independent of risk factors in multivariate regression analysis. In contrast, prevalence of coronary arterial calcification was similar between CGD patients and controls (14.6%, CGD, and 6.3%, controls, p=0.39). CONCLUSIONS: The observation by MRI of reduced carotid but not coronary artery atherosclerosis in CGD patients despite the high prevalence of traditional risk factors raises questions about the role of NOX2 in the pathogenesis of clinically significant atherosclerosis. Additional high-resolution studies in multiple vascular beds are required to address the therapeutic potential of NOX-inhibition in cardiovascular diseases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01063309

    Emotional experiences and psychological well-being in 51 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges to psychological well-being, but how can we predict when people suffer or cope during sustained stress? Here, we test the prediction that specific types of momentary emotional experiences are differently linked to psychological well-being during the pandemic. Study 1 used survey data collected from 24,221 participants in 51 countries during the COVID-19 outbreak. We show that, across countries, well-being is linked to individuals' recent emotional experiences, including calm, hope, anxiety, loneliness, and sadness. Consistent results are found in two age, sex, and ethnicity-representative samples in the United Kingdom (n = 971) and the United States (n = 961) with preregistered analyses (Study 2). A prospective 30-day daily diary study conducted in the United Kingdom (n = 110) confirms the key role of these five emotions and demonstrates that emotional experiences precede changes in well-being (Study 3). Our findings highlight differential relationships between specific types of momentary emotional experiences and well-being and point to the cultivation of calm and hope as candidate routes for well-being interventions during periods of sustained stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
    corecore