The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown. Aim: To understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences. Results: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation

Androgenetic alopecia as an indicator of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk

Numerous studies have investigated a probable association between androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) by researching limited and dispersed parameters. We aimed to evaluate both traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors in male patients with early-onset AGA. This case-control study included 68 participants: 51 male patients with early-onset AGA and 17 healthy male controls. Patients with AGA were classified into three groups according to the Hamilton-Norwood scale and the presence of vertex hair loss. Traditional and non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors were examined in all study subjects. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 25 patients with AGA and in two control subjects (p<0.05). The carotid intima-media thickness values were found to be significantly higher in patients with vertex pattern AGA than in patients without vertex baldness and controls (p<0.05). The pulse-wave velocity values were also found to be significantly higher in patients (p<0.001). A limitation of this study was the small study population. In conclusion, vertex pattern AGA appears to be a marker for early atherosclerosis. This finding supports the hypothesis that early-onset AGA alone could be an independent risk factor for CVD and metabolic syndrome

Netherton syndrome previously misdiagnosed as hyper IgE syndrome caused by a probable mutation in SPINK5 C

Netherton syndrome (NS, MIM256500) is an autosomal recessive disorder that includes ichthyosis linearis circumflexa and a predisposition to allergies, asthma, and eczema, with hypereosinophilia, trichorrhexis invaginata, and elevated serum IgE levels. The genetic bases of Netherton syndrome are mutations in the gene SPINK5, and the Lymphoepitheial Kazal type related inhibitor, a serine protease inhibitor, is encoded by SPINK. Here a case is presented which showed a probable splice site mutation in SPINK5, which was previously unknown in databases and the literature, to point out the misdiagnosis of Hyper IgE Syndrome in the early presentation of the phenotype. This case highlights that a genetic test can be critical for identifying NS. The finding of underlying mutations contributes to the understanding of Netherton syndrome and is instrumental in indicating a specific therapy. Notably, treatment with acitretin has significantly improved both the ichthyosis linearis circumflexa and eczema in our patient

Effectiveness of as-needed antihistamines in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients under omalizumab treatment

The question how second-generation antihistamines (sgAHs) should be used when chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is under control with omalizumab is still unanswered. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of as-needed sgAHs in patients with well-controlled urticaria under omalizumab treatment. Patients from four different urticaria centers who were treated with omalizumab 300 mg/4 weeks for at least 3 months, had well-controlled urticaria (Urticaria Control Test: 16 > UCT >= 12) and were using sgAHs only if needed, were included in this study. In order to assess effectiveness of sgAHs, change in the itch, hives, and total itch-hives scores before and after sgAHs were evaluated using modified urticaria activity score-twice daily. Fifty-three patients [38 female (71.7%)] with mean age 41.1 +/- 11.4 years were included in this study. Median sgAH intake per patient throughout the 4 week-intervals was 3 (2-5) tablets. sgAH intake decreased itch, hives and total itch-hives scores 45.7% +/- 52.9, 42.4% +/- 39.1, and 50.2% +/- 51.1, respectively (P < .001 for all). This decrease was similar in both isolated-urticaria and urticaria-and-angioedema phenotypes. Baseline IgE levels were positively correlated with the decrease of three symptom scores (r = 0.31, P = .05; r = 0.375, P = .017; r = 0.31, P = .05, respectively) that showed in patients with higher baseline total IgE levels, as needed sgAH intake decreased the symptom scores less. Our study showed that sgAHs may still be an effective option for the treatment of the intermittent symptoms in patients with well-controlled urticaria under omalizumab treatment. Baseline total IgE levels may be used as a potential biomarker for sgAH effectiveness in these patients