Ability of goat milk to modulate healthy human peripheral blood lymphomonocyte and polymorphonuclear cell function: in vitro effects and clinical implications

The in vitro effects of goat’s milk from different sources (Jonica, Saanen, and Priska breeds plus a commercial preparation) on healthy human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were evaluated in terms of nitric oxide (NO) and cytokine release. According to the incubation time (24 h or 48 h) used all milks could induce release of NO from monocytes. In this context, however, in the presence of a commercial milk preparation inhibition of lypopolysaccharide (LPS)-induce NO generation was evident. Also polymorphonuclear cells stimulated with the various milks released detectable amounts of NO. In the case of Priska milk inhibition of LPS-mediated NO generation was observed. Despite a broad array of cytokines tested [Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-, Transforming Growth Factor– and Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor] only IL-10, TNF-, and IL-6 were released by PBMCs upon stimulation with various milks. Taken together, these data indicate that goat’s milk for its capacity to produce NO may exert a cardioprotective and anti-atherogenic effect in consumers. Moreover, induction of proinflammatory (TNF- and IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines suggests the ability of this milk to maintain immune homeostasis in the immunocompromised host (e.g., aged people)

EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. METHODS: We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (<20%) (p = 0.02). Patients selected by EGFR mutation or clinical parameters (G1 and G4) also had significantly better progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of sex, smoking history, EGFR/KRAS mutation, and pAKT on outcomes and allowed us to derive an efficient predictive model. Histology, EGFR mutations, and pAKT were independent predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy at retrospective analysis, whereas pAKT and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression were the only independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of patients based on either EGFR mutation or clinical characteristics seems an effective approach to optimize EGFR-TKI treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients