9 research outputs found

    An Informant Questionnaire for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease: Are Some Items Better Than Others?

    No full text
    A decline in everyday cognitive functioning is important for diagnosing dementia. Informant questionnaires, such as the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE), are used to measure this. Previously, conflicting results on the IQCODEs ability to discriminate between Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively healthy elderly were found. We aim to investigate whether specific groups of items are more useful than others in discriminating between these patient groups. Informants of 180 AD, 59 MCI, and 89 patients with subjective memory complaints (SMC) completed the IQCODE. To investigate the grouping of questionnaire items, we used a two-dimensional graded response model (GRM).The association between IQCODE, age, gender, education, and diagnosis was modeled using structural equation modeling. The GRM with two groups of items fitted better than the unidimensional model. However, the high correlation between the dimensions (r=.90) suggested unidimensionality. The structural model showed that the IQCODE was able to differentiate between all patient groups. The IQCODE can be considered as unidimensional and as a useful addition to diagnostic screening in a memory clinic setting, as it was able to distinguish between AD, MCI, and SMC and was not influenced by gender or education. © Copyright The International Neuropsychological Society 2011

    Open surgical repair of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms with and without renal cooling: Observations regarding morbidity and mortality

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesLittle is known about the outcome of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (RJAA) repair. Surgical treatment of RJAAs requires suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, which causes additional renal ischemia-reperfusion injury on top of the pre-existing hypovolemic shock syndrome. As endovascular alternatives rarely exist in this situation, open repair continues to be the gold standard. We analyzed our results of open RJAA repair during an 11-year period.DesignRetrospective observational study.Materials and methodsBetween July 1997 and December 2008, all consecutive patients with RJAAs were included in the study. Part of these patients received cold perfusion of the kidneys during suprarenal aortic cross-clamping. Perioperative variables, morbidity, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality were assessed. Renal insufficiency was defined as an acute rise of ≥0.5 mg/dL in serum creatinine level. Multiple organ failure (MOF) was scored using the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score).ResultsA total of 29 consecutive patients with an RJAA, confirmed by computed tomography-scanning, presented to our hospital. In eight patients, the operation was aborted before the start of aortic repair, because no blood pressure could be regained in spite of maximal resuscitation measures. They were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 21 patients, 10 died during hospital stay. Renal insufficiency occurred in 11 out of 21 of the patients. Eleven out of 21 patients developed MOF postoperatively. In a subgroup of patients who received renal cooling during suprarenal aortic clamping, the 30-day or in-hospital mortality was two of 10 vs eight of 11 in patients who did not receive renal cooling (P = .03); renal insufficiency occurred in one out of 10 patients in the subgroup with renal cooling vs 10 out of 11 without renal cooling (P < .001) and MOF in two of 10 vs nine of 11, respectively (P = .009).ConclusionsOpen surgical repair of RJAAs is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. To our knowledge, this is the first report of cold perfusion of the kidneys during RJAA repair. Although numbers are small, a beneficial effect of renal cooling on the outcome of RJAA repair is suggested, warranting further research with this technique

    A new informant-based questionnaire for instrumental activities of daily living in dementia

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundInterference in everyday functioning is part of the diagnostic criteria for dementia. Questionnaires measuring “instrumental activities of daily living” (IADL) are used to measure this interference, but the psychometric quality of these questionnaires is often questioned. In addition, these questionnaires are less suited for early-onset patients. This is problematic, given the high frequency of relatively young patients in memory clinics. In this article, we describe the development and psychometric properties of a new informant-based IADL questionnaire aimed at detecting incipient dementia and appropriate for a broad age range.MethodsWe defined IADL in consensus with experts and constructed items based on existing items and suggestions from experts and informants. Informants of subjects (n = 206) who visited the Alzheimer Center of the VU University Medical Center completed the questionnaire. Factor structure was investigated using classical exploratory factor analysis and item response theory. We assessed test–retest reliability in 73 informants using weighted κ values.ResultsThe questionnaire consisted of 75 items and was computerized to enhance ease of administration. Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor model, with 48.3% of the variance being explained by the first factor. We removed five items, as they did not fit the model. High internal consistency was demonstrated. Test–retest reliability showed that the majority of items (87.9%) had substantial-to-almost perfect κ values.ConclusionThe Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire (Amsterdam IADL questionnaire is a registered trademark of Alzheimer Center VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) is a 70-item informant-based computerized questionnaire aimed at detecting early dementia and early-onset dementia. Initial results show that this questionnaire is a promising new tool
    corecore