Patient with Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Small Vessel Vasculitis, Acute Renal Failure, and Coronavirus Disease-19 Pneumonia: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) has a predilection for the kidney and more than three quarters of patients have renal involvement with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Small-vessel systemic vasculitis may present as pulmonary-renal syndrome and is characterized by necrotizing glomerulonephritis and pulmonary hemorrhage. Diagnosis and therapy for AAV in coronavirus disease (COVID) COVID-19 pandemic require multi-disciplinary collaboration due to the affection of multiple systems and risks associated with immunosuppressive medications. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old non-smoker, non-diabetic female presented in the outpatient unit at the department of pulmonology with dry cough, malaise, and sub-febrile temperature, lasting for 1 month. The patient had a high suspicion of severe pulmonary-renal syndrome, ANCA-AAV, and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. She was treated with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and plasma exchange. The treatment led to temporary improvement. Infections with COVID-19, Enterococcus in the urine, and Acinetobacter in the tracheal aspirate further complicated the clinical picture and despite antibiotic treatment, use of tocilizumab and convalescent plasma, the outcome was lethal. CONCLUSION: It is important to establish the diagnosis and distinguish accurately between vasculitis and infection to provide adequate and timely therapy

Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.

Eugene Nelson and colleagues call for registries of care data to be transformed into patient centred interactive learning systemsThis work is supported by funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grants: #71211 and 72313), the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (Grant #OCONNO04Q10), and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America Quality of Care Initiative (Grant #3372). TSM was funded by the Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center for Musculoskeletal Diseases at Dartmouth (P60 AR-062799, A. Tosteson, PI), sponsored by the National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. EE was funded by The Swedish Research Council for Health, Work Life and Welfare (#2014-4238). MDW is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator award (WT09789).This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from BMJ Group via https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i331

Patients are doing it for themselves : A survey on disease-specific knowledge acquisition among people with Parkinson's disease in Sweden.

Effective self-management is key to living well with Parkinson's disease and one important aspect is disease-specific knowledge. This article explores how people with Parkinson's disease in Sweden (1) acquire disease-specific knowledge and (2) use Parkinson's disease-related healthcare. Data were collected through an online survey, which had 346 respondents (16-87 years old, median age: 68 years, 51% male; time since diagnosis: 0-31 years, median time: 7 years). Our results show that disease-specific knowledge is mainly found online, especially for women with Parkinson's disease and people with Parkinson's disease of working age, that most people with Parkinson's disease in Sweden see their neurologist for 1 h or less per year and only one in two people with Parkinson's disease has regular contact with other Parkinson's disease-related healthcare professionals. We also find that people with Parkinson's disease reporting higher levels of specific knowledge also are more likely to be satisfied with the amount of time they get with their neurologist, regardless of the amount of time

Digital Health Technologies Enabling Partnerships in Chronic Care Management : Scoping Review

Background: An increasing number of patients expect and want to play a greater role in their treatment and care decisions. This emphasizes the need to adopt collaborative health care practices, which implies collaboration among interprofessional health care teams and patients, their families, caregivers, and communities. In recent years, digital health technologies that support self-care and collaboration between the community and health care providers (ie, participatory health technologies) have received increasing attention. However, knowledge regarding the features of such technologies that support effective patient-professional partnerships is still limited. Objective: This study aimed to map and assess published studies on participatory health technologies intended to support partnerships among patients, caregivers, and health care professionals in chronic care, focusing specifically on identifying the main features of these technologies. Methods: A scoping review covering scientific publications in English between January 2008 and December 2020 was performed. We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases. Peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies that evaluated digital health technologies for patient-professional partnerships in chronic care settings were included. The data were charted and analyzed thematically. The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was used. Results: This review included 32 studies, reported in 34 papers. The topic of participatory health technologies experienced a slightly increasing trend across publication years, with most papers originating from the United States and Norway. Diabetes and cardiovascular diseases were the most common conditions addressed. Of the 32 studies, 12 (38%) evaluated the influence of participatory health technologies on partnerships, mostly with positive outcomes, although we also identified how partnership relationships and the nature of collaborative work could be challenged when the roles and expectations between users were unclear. Six common features of participatory health technologies were identified: patient-professional communication, self-monitoring, tailored self-care support, self-care education, care planning, and community forums for peer-to-peer interactions. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the importance of clarifying mutual expectations and carefully considering the implications that the introduction of participatory health technologies may have on the work of patients and health care professionals, both individually and in collaboration. A knowledge gap remains regarding the use of participatory health technologies to effectively support patient-professional partnerships in chronic care management