13 research outputs found

    Multinational prospective cohort study of rates and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia over 24 years in 42 countries of Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)

    Get PDF
    Objective: Rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are several times above those of high-income countries. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors (RFs) for VAP cases in ICUs of LMICs. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: This study was conducted across 743 ICUs of 282 hospitals in 144 cities in 42 Asian, African, European, Latin American, and Middle Eastern countries. Participants: The study included patients admitted to ICUs across 24 years. Results: In total, 289,643 patients were followed during 1,951,405 patient days and acquired 8,236 VAPs. We analyzed 10 independent variables. Multiple logistic regression identified the following independent VAP RFs: male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.28; P <.0001); longer length of stay (LOS), which increased the risk 7% per day (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.07-1.08; P <.0001); mechanical ventilation (MV) utilization ratio (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23-1.31; P <.0001); continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which was associated with the highest risk (aOR, 13.38; 95% CI, 11.57-15.48; P <.0001)Revisión por pare

    International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 36 countries, for 2004-2009

    Full text link
    The results of a surveillance study conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) from January 2004 through December 2009 in 422 intensive care units (ICUs) of 36 countries in Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Europe are reported. During the 6-year study period, using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN; formerly the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system [NNIS]) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infections, we gathered prospective data from 313,008 patients hospitalized in the consortium's ICUs for an aggregate of 2,194,897 ICU bed-days. Despite the fact that the use of devices in the developing countries' ICUs was remarkably similar to that reported in US ICUs in the CDC's NHSN, rates of device-associated nosocomial infection were significantly higher in the ICUs of the INICC hospitals; the pooled rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection in the INICC ICUs of 6.8 per 1,000 central line-days was more than 3-fold higher than the 2.0 per 1,000 central line-days reported in comparable US ICUs. The overall rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia also was far higher (15.8 vs 3.3 per 1,000 ventilator-days), as was the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (6.3 vs. 3.3 per 1,000 catheter-days). Notably, the frequencies of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to imipenem (47.2% vs 23.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to ceftazidime (76.3% vs 27.1%), Escherichia coli isolates to ceftazidime (66.7% vs 8.1%), Staphylococcus aureus isolates to methicillin (84.4% vs 56.8%), were also higher in the consortium's ICUs, and the crude unadjusted excess mortalities of device-related infections ranged from 7.3% (for catheter-associated urinary tract infection) to 15.2% (for ventilator-associated pneumonia). Copyright (C) 2011 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

    International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, datasummary of 50 countries for 2010-2015 : Device-associated module

    Get PDF
    Q3Artículo original1495-1504Background: We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) sur-veillance study from January 2010-December 2015 in 703 intensive care units (ICUs) in Latin America,Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific.Methods:During the 6-year study period, using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Health-care Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI), we collected prospective data from 861,284 patients hospitalized in INICC hospital ICUs for an aggregateof 3,506,562 days.Results:Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAIrates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the INICC medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection, 4.1 per 1,000 central line-days, was nearly 5-fold higher than the 0.8per 1,000 central line-days reported from comparable US ICUs, the overall rate of ventilator-associatedpneumonia was also higher, 13.1 versus 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days, as was the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 5.07 versus 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days. From blood cultures samples,frequencies of resistance ofPseudomonasisolates to amikacin (29.87% vs 10%) and to imipenem (44.3%vs 26.1%), and ofKlebsiella pneumoniaeisolates to ceftazidime (73.2% vs 28.8%) and to imipenem (43.27%vs 12.8%) were also higher in the INICC ICUs compared with CDC-NHSN ICUs.Conclusions:Although DA-HAIs in INICC ICU patients continue to be higher than the rates reported inCDC-NSHN ICUs representing the developed world, we have observed a significant trend toward the re-duction of DA-HAI rates in INICC ICUs as shown in each international report. It is INICC’s main goal tocontinue facilitating education, training, and basic and cost-effective tools and resources, such as stan-dardized forms and an online platform, to tackle this problem effectively and systematically

    Fluoride levels in Almadinah Almunawwarah bottled water

    No full text
    لملخص العربي: الملخص العربي: الأهداف: كان الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو وصف مستويات الفلوريد في زجاجات المياه المعبأة والمتوفرة تجارياً ولتحديد دقة ملصقات مستويات الفلوريد على الزجاجات. الطريقة: تم الحصول على (28) ملصق مياة معبأة من أسواق المدينة المنورة. تم تخفيف عينات المياه بكميات متساوية من إجمالي عازلة تعديل القوة الأيونية في الإدارة العامة لخدمات المياه. تمت مقارنة جهود المحاليل الكهربية بشكل مباشر مع محاليل الفلوريد القياسية. تم أخذ قراءتين لكل عينة وتم تسجيل المتوسط. تم قياس مستويات أيون الفلوريد باستخدام قطب فلوريد أيون انتقائي ومقياس أيون رقمي. النتائج: كان متوسط مستويات الفلورايد للزجاجات  حسب الملصق الموجود بالزجاجات 0.94 ±0.14 جزء في المليون. كان متوسط مستويات الفلوريد لمحتوى الفلورايد الفعلي بعد التحليل 1.13  ±0.31 .جزء في المليون  تم العثور على تضارب بين الملصقات التجاريه في الزجاجات وبين نتيجه التحليل الفعلي . وجدت نتيجة علامة تجارية واحدة فقط تناسبت بها مستويات الفلورايد على ملصقاتها وتحليل مستوى الفلورايد الفعلي. 85.71٪ فقط من العلامات التجارية كانت تحتوي على مستويات فلوريد ضمن نطاق الفلورايد المسموح به (0.6-1.5 جزء في المليون) ، 10.71٪ كان لديها مستويات فلوريد أعلى من نطاق الفلورايد المسموح به ، و 3.57٪ كان لديها مستويات فلوريد أقل من نطاق الفلورايد المسموح به. الاستنتاجات: في المملكة العربية السعودية  تحتوي معظم زجاجات المياه المعبأة على مستويات من الفلوريد أعلى من المستويات المثالية والحيوية لمنع تسوس الأسنان. حيث وجد اختلاف في مستويات الفلوريد بين ما هو موجود على ملصقات العلامات التجارية وما وجد في التحليل الفعلي . لتحقيق الفوائد المرجوه والتجميلية اللازمة  يجب التاكد من مستويات الفلورايد بدقة. يجب أن تستوفي المياه المعبأة معايير الجودة اللازمه لتجنب النتائج السلبية لارتفاع مستويات الفلوريد. يجب أن يكون أطباء الأسنان وأولياء الأمور على دراية بهذا التناقض Abstract: Objectives: This research aimed to determine the fluoride levels in commercially available bottled waters and assess the accuracy of the fluoride levels labels on the bottles. Methods: We obtained the labels from 28 water bottles from markets in Almadinah Almunawwarah. Water samples were diluted with an equal volume of total ionic strength adjustment buffer at the General Administration for Water Services. The electrode potential of each sample was then directly compared to standard fluoride solutions. For each sample, two readings were taken, and the average was recorded. Fluoride-ion levels were determined using a fluoride-ion-selective electrode and a digital readout ion meter. Results: On average, the mean fluoride levels in the labelled bottles were 0.94 ± 0.14 PPM. The level of the actual fluoride content was 1.13 ± 0.31 PPM. Inconsistencies between the brand labels and true levels of fluoride were detected. Only one brand of bottled water was comparable in terms of the fluoride levels on the labels and the analysed fluoride levels. Only 85.71% of the brands tested had fluoride levels within the permissible fluoride range (0.6–1.5 PPM), 10.71% had fluoride levels above the permissible fluoride range, and 3.57% had fluoride levels below the permissible fluoride range. Conclusions: In the KSA, most brands of bottled waters had fluoride levels above the ideal levels that are vital to the prevention of dental caries. There were differences in the fluoride levels recorded on the labels and the true levels determined in the laboratory. Fluoride levels must be accurately reported if we are to achieve necessary aesthetic and cosmetic benefits. Bottled water must meet critical quality standards to avoid the negative consequences of higher fluoride levels. Dentists and parents should be aware of this discrepancy
    corecore