Sacred Alliance or Pact with the Devil? How and Why Social Enterprises Collaborate with Mainstream Businesses in the Fair Trade Sector

This paper uses institutional theory to highlight different patterns of cross-sector collaboration from the perspective of social enterprises. Specifically, it explores how and why social enterprises interact with mainstream businesses and to what extent their collaboration patterns reflect a vision of how their social mission should be implemented and institutionalized. The empirical analysis is derived from a qualitative study of ‘fair trade’ – a hybrid model created by social enterprises and using market mechanisms to support small-scale producers in developing countries and to advocate for changes in international trading practices. The findings highlight three strategies used by fair trade social enterprises to manage their interactions with mainstream businesses: sector solidarity, selective engagement, and active appropriation. This paper suggests that each strategy is motivated by a different vision of how best to articulate the social mission of fair trade via specific types of collaborations. It also notes how each vision has a distinct pattern of institutionalization at the field level. This paper adds to the emergent literatures on social enterprise and social entrepreneurship, fair trade, cross-sector collaboration and hybrid organizing

Flexible Transparent Heater Fabricated from Spray-Coated In:ZnO/Ag-NWs/In:ZnO Multilayers on Polyimide Foil

A flexible transparent heater is presented, based on an all-sprayed composite architecture of indium-doped zinc oxide (IZO) layers that sandwich a network of silver nanowires, on a polyimide-foil substrate. This architecture could be materialized through the development of a low-temperature (240 °C) spray-pyrolysis process for the IZO layers, which is compatible with the thermal stability of the transparent polyimide substrate and allows for the formation of compact and transparent layers, without precipitates. The IZO layers entirely embed the silver nanowires, offering protection against environmental degradation and decreasing the junction resistance of the nanowire network. The resulting transparent heaters have a high mean transmittance of 0.76 (including the substrate) and sheet resistance of 7.5 Ω/sq. A steady-state temperature of ~130 °C is achieved at an applied bias of 3.5 V, with fast heater response times, with a time constant of ~4 s The heater is mechanically stable, reaching or surpassing 100 °C (at 3.5 V), under tensile, respectively, compressive-bending stress. This work shows that high-performance transparent heaters can be fabricated using all-sprayed oxide/silver-nanowire composite coatings, that are compatible with large-scale and low-cost production

Low intestinal IL22 associates with increased transplant-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The role of IL-22 in adult patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is of major interest since animal studies showed a protective and regenerative effect of IL-22 in graft versus host disease (GvHD). However, no clinical data exist on the tissue expression. Here we demonstrate that patients not suffering from transplant-related mortality (TRM) show significantly upregulated IL22 expression during histological and clinical GI-GvHD (p = 0.048 and p = 0.022, respectively). In contrast, in GvHD patients suffering from TRM, IL22 was significantly lower (p = 0.007). Accordingly, lower IL22 was associated with a higher probability of TRM in survival analysis (p = 0.005). In a multivariable competing risk Cox regression analysis, low IL22 was identified as an independent risk factor for TRM (p = 0.007, hazard ratio 2.72, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.61). The expression of IL22 seemed to be microbiota dependent as broad-spectrum antibiotics significantly diminished IL22 expression (p = 0.019). Furthermore, IL22 expression significantly correlated with G-protein coupled receptor (GPR)43 (r = 0.263, p = 0.015) and GPR41 expression (r = 0.284, p = 0.009). In conclusion, our findings reveal an essential role of IL22 for the prognosis of patients undergoing allogeneic SCT

Non-Invasive Imaging Provides Spatiotemporal Information on Disease Progression and Response to Therapy in a Murine Model of Multiple Myeloma

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy, where malignant plasma cells clonally expand in the bone marrow of older people, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Typical clinical symptoms include increased serum calcium levels, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone lesions. With standard therapies, MM remains incurable; therefore, the development of new drugs or immune cell-based therapies is desirable. To advance the goal of finding a more effective treatment for MM, we aimed to develop a reliable preclinical MM mouse model applying sensitive and reproducible methods for monitoring of tumor growth and metastasis in response to therapy. Material and Methods: A mouse model was created by intravenously injecting bone marrow-homing mouse myeloma cells (MOPC-315.BM) that expressed luciferase into BALB/c wild type mice. The luciferase in the myeloma cells allowed in vivo tracking before and after melphalan treatment with bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Homing of MOPC-315.BM luciferase+ myeloma cells to specific tissues was examined by flow cytometry. Idiotype-specific myeloma protein serum levels were measured by ELISA. In vivo measurements were validated with histopathology. Results: Strong bone marrow tropism and subsequent dissemination of MOPC-315.BM luciferase+ cells in vivo closely mimicked the human disease. In vivo BLI and later histopathological analysis revealed that 12 days of melphalan treatment slowed tumor progression and reduced MM dissemination compared to untreated controls. MOPC-315.BM luciferase+ cells expressed CXCR4 and high levels of CD44 and a4b1 in vitro which could explain the strong bone marrow tropism. The results showed that MOPC-315.BM cells dynamically regulated homing receptor expression and depended on interactions with surrounding cells. Conclusions: This study described a novel MM mouse model that facilitated convenient, reliable, and sensitive tracking of myeloma cells with whole body BLI in living animals. This model is highly suitable for monitoring the effects of different treatment regimens

The German Family Panel (pairfam)

The German Family Panel pairfam is a multidisciplinary, longitudinal study on partnership and family dynamics in Germany, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The annually collected survey data from a nationwide random sample of more than 12,000 persons of the three birth cohorts 1971-73, 1981-83, 1991-93 and their partners, parents and children offer unique opportunities for the analysis of partner and intergenerational relationships as they develop over the course of multiple life phases. A comprehensive description of the conceptual framework and the design of the German Family Panel is given in the concept paper by Huinink et al. (2011). The data from the three waves of the supplemental DemoDiff study as well as data from the step-up respondents are also included in the Scientific Use File (SUF). DemoDiff is a parallel study of East German anchor respondents from the birth cohorts 1971-73 and 1981-83, as well as their partners, funded by the Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock. The first wave of the DemoDiff study began with a one-year delay after the pairfam study; the last DemoDiff wave coincided with the fourth pairfam wave. From Wave 5, the DemoDiff respondents were integrated into the pairfam sample. Step-up respondents are former respondents of the child survey that have turned 15 and now participate in the main anchor survey. These step-up respondents have been surveyed since Wave 4, their data saved in separate data sets. In Wave 11, the two youngest birth cohorts (1981-1983 and 1991-1993) were refreshed alongside a new sample from a younger birth cohort (2001-2003). In total, over 5,000 new respondents plus their partners and children were interviewed. The oldest birth cohort (1971-1973) was not refreshed. The question program for the refreshment sample is almost identical to that of the original sample. Some questions designed for repeat-participants were not posed, and refreshment sample respondents additionally answered questions posed to the original sample in previous waves. From Wave 12, the original sample and refreshment sample respondents receive identical question programs. The German Family Panel is a multi-subject study focusing on aspects of partnership and family dynamics. 1.) Partnership formation and development 2.) Transition to first and consecutive births 3.) Intergenerational relationships 4.) Parenting and child development In addition, the survey also touches on various issues from other life domains and demography. Most of the instruments are utilized either annually in each survey wave (core modules) or are rotated every two or every three years (extended modules). In the main survey, the anchor persons report - among other things - retrospectively on changes related to their partnerships, children, residences, and educational and occupational career since the last wave (Event History Calendar). The questionnaires for partners, parents, and children are similar to the main survey in terms of topics but differ in length and content. The more detailed variable lists comprise all variables with names and labels plus notes on changes between the waves. These lists are available online . The project "Dynamics of Implicit Motives in Intimate Relationships" was designed as a satellite project to the German Family Panel Pairfam https://www.pairfam.de/. The project surveyed the longitudinal interaction of partner-related explicit and implicit motive dispositions with relationship quality in German couple relationships over three years. The population comprises all pairfam anchor persons (and their partners) who a) are in a romantic relationship, b) are at least 18 years old and c) speak fluent German. The study was conducted online (CAWI) and ran from August 2016 to August 2019. Primary researchers of the satellite project are Birk Hagemeyer (University of Jena) and Felix D. Schönbrodt (LMU Munich).1.) Partnership formation and development: Expectations concerning partnership (positive, negative); Partnership biography since age 14 (sex and age of partners, partnership, cohabitation and marriage episodes by month); Getting to know each other (current partner); Institutionalization of partnership (plans, ambivalence, stages); Sexuality (first times, sexual orientation, frequency of sexual intercourse, sexual competence and communication, satisfaction with sex life); Activities with partner (leisure); Cohabitation (dwelling, distance between places of residence); Division of household chores (several activities, fairness); Finances in partnership (bank accounts, living expenses); Quality of partnership (dyadic coping, NRI, MITA, feelings of competence, future orientation, readiness to make sacrifices, reciprocity orientation, problems in partnership, hostile attributions, areas of conflicts, conflict styles and behavior, tolerance of conflicts, satisfaction with relationship, subjective instability of partnership); Module for singles (satisfaction with situation as single, interest in partnership, desire for partnership, characteristics of the partner market, subjective chances, broad and in-depth exploration); Separation module (course of separation, problems in partnership, effects on children, emotional distress after separation, exposure with separation, custody and alimony arrangements). 2.) Transition to first and consecutive births: Expectations concerning life with children (value of children); Pregnancy (existence of pregnancy, tried to sire a child/get pregnant, infertility, procreation/measures inducing pregnancy, abortion/miscarriage, hypothetical social support in case of pregnancy); Contraception (use, methods, consistency of use); Social influences on family planning (by friends and parents); Fertility plans (ideal and realistic number of children, intention to become parent, timing of parenthood, agreement with partner, willingness to cut back for children, effects of being parent, parenthood decision making, reasons against children); Preconditions for parenthood (assessment of actual and target state); Societal context (assessment, influences of family policy). 3.) Intergenerational relationships: Expectations concerning the relationship to parents (value of parents); Familial norms; Family and partnership related values; Quality of parent-child-relationship (NRI); Dimensions of intergenerational relationships (frequency of contact, emotional closeness, travel-time distance); Given and received support (emotional, material, instrumental); Nursing (need for care parents, care provider); Activities parents with children (leisure); Leaving parents’ home (age). 4.) Parenting and child development: Child rearing goals; Parenting styles; Parenting role (parental self-efficacy, autonomy, anxious overprotection, social support, readiness to make sacrifices, hostile attributions); Co-parenting (problems, problem solving, appreciation/support); Perception of parental parenting style (negative communication, MITA); Assessment of own childhood; Child care (responsible persons, satisfaction with child care situation); Behavior of children (SDQ); Health of children (specific and in general); Newborn and infant module (delivery, checkups, breastfeeding, temperament, sleep at night, crying behavior, unspecific strain). Other life domains: Personality (“Big Five”); Well-being (loneliness, self-worth, depressiveness, etc.); Health (general status, handicap, sleep at night, body height and weight); Importance of life domains (occupation, family, etc.); Satisfaction (with life, school/job, leisure activities, friends, family, financial situation); Network integration (number of friends, network generator); Leisure (several activities); Religiosity (religious denomination, frequency of church visits); work-life-balance, critical life events in social environment. Demography: Sex; Age; Marital status; Country of birth and nationality; Number of siblings and relatives; Education (education career, educational attainment); Employment biography (employment episodes, occupation, occupational status); Employment situation (work schedule arrangement, temporary employment contract, multiple jobs, conditions at workplace, commuting, maternity/paternity leave, military/civilian service); Income and benefits (current gross and net income per month, net household income, drawing of social benefits, alimony payment, income on investments, economic deprivation); Residential biography since age 18 (first move out of parents‘ home, places of residence in federal state and country, first and second place of residence, moves, type of current household, ownership of dwelling, total living space, number of rooms, monthly expenditures for dwelling, frequency of overnight stays); Household grid (number of further persons in the household and their sex, age, kind of relationship); Information about current partner (date of birth, country of birth and nationality, education, occupation, job position, children from earlier relationships, place of residence); Information about children (number, sex, date of birth, status, cohabitation, contact, second parent, health status, child care); Information about biological parents and stepparents (date of birth, whether still alive and - if applicable - date of death, country of birth and nationality, highest level of education and vocational training, marital status, relationship status, cohabitation, old and new partnership). Starting with Wave 7, the step-up Cohort was asked about their social media use (activities with social media, frequency of Internet use, reasons for use, negative online experiences, feelings towards others after online contact, Internet dependency, fear if missing out, group norms) and about their risk-taking behavior (and delinquency). The parents of the anchor persons are only interviewed up to wave 8. Due to considerably low response rates in the parents survey, this was redesigned as one-time grandparent survey in wave 8. Children of the anchor persons taking part in the child survey will be admitted to the panel as new anchor persons (step-ups) after their 16th birthday. Starting with wave 8, all respondents under 18 were asked about: emotional symptoms (emotion); conduct problems; prosocial behavior; hyperactivity; peer problems. Starting with Wave 9, a new PAPI instrument on Parenting Adolescents and Young Adults (PAYA) was introduced to survey anchors and their partners regarding their relationship with adolescent and young adult offspring. Until Wave 9, the assessment of parent-child relationships and parenting was restricted to children up to age 15. Furthermore, PAYA includes new indicators on parental autonomy support and conversely - helicopter parenting to address this recently debated issue. Within this instrument, quality of parent-child relations are measured (supplementing the already existing child-parent perspective from the Child Interview) and questions concerning parenting of adolescent children (e.g., helicopter parenting). Starting with wave 11, we introduced an additional parenting survey for partners to assess dyadic information on children under the age of 6 years as addressed by the module for babies and toddlers and the module for 3 to 5 year old children in the anchor survey. Questions include child behavior, temperament, night sleep, hostile attributions and parenting behavior. The pairfam COVID-19 survey is an additional online survey covering the COVID-19 situation. It was conducted between May and July 2020. As a study of family life in Germany, it is particularly well suited to capture the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in private lives and personal relationships. The survey lasted approximately 15 minutes and was conducted by Kantar Public. It was targeted towards all respondents of the pairfam panel, i.e. respondents who were part of the gross sample of wave 12 and had not refused participation. In total, 3,154 anchor persons participated. For more information: ZA5959 Das Beziehungs- und Familienpanel pairfam ist eine von der DFG finanzierte multidisziplinäre Längsschnittstudie zur Erforschung der partnerschaftlichen und familialen Lebensformen in Deutschland. Die jährlich erhobenen Befragungsdaten von über 12.000 bundesweit zufällig ausgewählten Personen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1971-73, 1981-83 und 1991-93 sowie von deren Partnern, Eltern und Kindern bieten ein weltweit einmaliges Analysepotenzial bezüglich der Entwicklung von Partnerschafts- und Generationenbeziehungen in unterschiedlichen Lebensphasen. Eine umfassende Darstellung der methodischen und konzeptionellen Grundlagen des Beziehungs- und Familienpanels bietet das pairfam-Referenzpapier von Huinink et al. (2011). Ebenfalls im Scientific-Use-File enthalten sind die Daten der drei Wellen der Zusatzstudie DemoDiff und die Daten der Stepup-Befragten. DemoDiff ist eine vom Max-Planck-Institut für demographische Forschung in Rostock finanzierte parallele Befragung ostdeutscher Ankerpersonen der Kohorten 1971-73 und 1981-83 sowie deren jeweiliger Partner. Die erste DemoDiff-Erhebungswelle fand zeitverzögert ein Jahr nach dem Start von pairfam statt, die letzte DemoDiff-Welle zeitgleich mit der vierten Welle von pairfam. Mit Welle 5 wurden die Befragten von DemoDiff in die Stichprobe von pairfam übernommen. Stepup-Befragte sind ehemalige Teilnehmer an der Kinderbefragung, die über 15 Jahre alt sind und im Rahmen der Ankerpersonenbefragung weiterhin an pairfam teilnehmen. Die Stepups werden seit der vierten Welle befragt und sind in separaten Datensätzen abgelegt. In der 11. Welle wurden die beiden jüngeren Kohorten (1981-1983, 1991-1993) aufgestockt und eine neue Kohorte (2001-2003) implementiert. Insgesamt wurden über 5.000 neue Personen plus deren Partner und Kinder befragt. Die älteste Kohorte (1971-1973) wurde nicht aufgestockt. Das Frageprogramm der Aufstocker-Stichprobe gleicht zum größten Teil den Fragen der Originalstichprobe. Nur wenige Fragen, die für eine wiederholte Teilnahme konzipiert sind, wurden nicht gestellt. Zusätzlich beantwortete die Aufstocker-Stichprobe ein paar Fragen, welche der Originalstichprobe bereits in vorherigen Wellen gestellt wurden. Ab der 12. Welle gibt es keine Unterschiede mehr im Frageprogramm der Aufstocker-Stichprobe und der Originalstichprobe. Das Beziehungs- und Familienpanel ist eine Mehrthemenstudie mit Fokus auf partnerschafts- und familienrelevante Merkmale. 1.) Entwicklung und Gestaltung von Partnerschaften 2.) Familiengründung und -erweiterung 3.) Intergenerationale Beziehungen 4.) Erziehung und kindliche Entwicklung Zudem werden mit dem Frageprogramm zahlreiche Aspekte aus anderen Lebensbereichen und umfangreiche soziodemographische Informationen erfasst. Die meisten Instrumente kommen alljährlich (Kernmodule) oder rotierend alle zwei bis drei Befragungswellen (Vertiefungsmodule) zum Einsatz. Die Hauptbefragung wird mit den Ankerpersonen durchgeführt, unter anderem mit monatsgenauen Angaben zu Ereignissen in Bezug auf Partnerschaft, Kinder, Wohnen sowie Bildung und Erwerbstätigkeit (Event History Calendar). Das Befragungsprogramm für die Partner, Eltern und Kinder orientiert sich an der Haupterhebung, unterscheidet sich jedoch in Umfang und Inhalt. Die vollständige Auflistung aller Items inklusive Hinweisen auf Änderungen zwischen den Wellen kann den Variablenlisten entnommen werden. Diese Übersicht und die vollständigen Fragebögen sind abrufbar auf der pairfam Homepage unter Dokumentation. Das Projekt "Dynamics of Implicit Motives in Intimate Relationship" wurde als Satellitenprojekt zum Deutschen Familienpanel Pairfam https://www.pairfam.de/ konzipiert. Das Projekt untersuchte das längsschnittliche Zusammenspiel partnerbezogener expliziter und impliziter Motivdispositionen mit der Beziehungsqualität in deutschen Paarbeziehungen über drei Jahre. Die Grundgesamtheit umfasst alle pairfam Anker-Personen (und ihre Partner), die a) in einer Liebesbeziehung sind, b) mindestens 18 Jahre alt sind und c) fließend Deutsch sprechen. Die Studie wurde online (CAWI) durchgeführt und lief von August 2016 bis August 2019. Primärforscher des Satellitenprojekts sind Birk Hagemeyer (Universität Jena) und Felix D. Schönbrodt (LMU München).1.) Entwicklung und Gestaltung von Partnerschaften: Erwartungen an Partnerschaften (positiv, negativ); Partnerschaftsbiografie ab dem 14. Lebensjahr (Geschlecht und Alter der Partner, monatsgenaue Beziehungs-, Kohabitations- und Eheepisoden); Kennenlernen (aktueller Partner); Institutionalisierung der Partnerschaft (Intentionen, Ambivalenz, Fortschritte); Sexualität (erste Male, sexuelle Orientierung, Häufigkeit Geschlechtsverkehr, sexuelle Kompetenz und Kommunikation, Zufriedenheit mit Sexualleben); gemeinsame Aktivitäten mit Partner (Freizeit); Kohabitation (Wohnsituation, Wohnortentfernung); Arbeitsteilung im Haushalt (verschiedene Tätigkeiten, Fairness); gemeinsame Finanzen (Kontoführung, Ausgaben); Partnerschaftsqualität (dyadisches Coping, NRI, MITA, Kompetenzgefühle, Zukunftsorientierung, Opferbereitschaft, Reziprozitätsorientierung, beziehungswidrige Ereignisse, feindselige Attributionen, Konfliktbereiche, Konfliktstile, Konflikttoleranz, Konfliktverhalten, Beziehungszufriedenheit, subjektive Partnerschaftsinstabilität); Single-Modul (Zufriedenheit als Single, Partnerinteresse, Partnerwunsch, Merkmale des Partnermarkts, subjektive Chancen, Exploration in Breite und Tiefe); Trennungsmodul (Ablauf der Trennung, beziehungswidrige Ereignisse, Auswirkungen der Trennung auf Kinder, spezifische Emotionen heute, Umgang mit Trennung, Sorgerechts- und Unterhaltsregelung). 2.) Familiengründung und Familienerweiterung: Erwartungen an Kinder (Value of Children); Schwangerschaft (Bestehen einer Schwangerschaft, Zeugungsversuche, Fruchtbarkeit, Repromaßnahmen, Abbruch/Fehlgeburt, hypothetische Unterstützung durch soziales Umfeld); Empfängnisverhütung (Anwendung, Methode, Konsequenz der Verhütung); Einflüsse des sozialen Umfelds auf Familienplanung (durch Freunde und Eltern); Familienplanung (Kinderwunsch, realistische Kinderzahl, Fertilitätsabsichten, Timing von Elternschaft, Übereinstimmung mit Partner, Einschränkungsbereitschaft, Auswirkungen von Elternschaft, Entscheidungsfindung, Gründe gegen Kinder); Voraussetzungen für Kinder (Soll- und Ist-Bewertung); gesellschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen (Bewertungen, familienpolitische Änderungen). 3.) Intergenerationale Beziehungen (IGB): Erwartungen an Beziehung zu Eltern; familiale Normen; partnerschafts- und familienbezogene Werte; Qualität der Eltern-Kind-Beziehung (NRI); IGB-Dimensionen (Kontakthäufigkeit, emotionale Nähe, Wohnentfernung); gegenseitige Unterstützungsleistungen (emotional, materiell, instrumentell); Pflegebedürftigkeit der Eltern (Hilfeleistung); gemeinsame Freizeit Eltern-Kinder (verschiedene Aktivitäten); Alter bei Auszug aus dem Elternhaus. 4.) Erziehung und kindliche Entwicklung: Erziehungsziele; Erziehungsstile; Elternrolle (Kompetenz, Autonomie, Überfürsorge, soziale Unterstützung, Opferbereitschaft, negative Attributionen); Coparenting (Probleme, Problemlösung, Unterstützung); eigene Erziehung durch Eltern (negative Kommunikation, MITA); Einschätzung der eigenen Kindheit; Betreuungssituation der Kinder (verantwortliche Personen, Zufriedenheit); Persönlichkeit der Kinder (SDQ); Gesundheit der Kinder (spezifisch, allgemein); Neugeborenen-/Kleinkinder-Modul (Entbindung, U-Untersuchungen, Stillverhalten, Temperament des Kindes, Nachtschlaf, Schreiverhalten, Belastungssituation). Andere Lebensbereiche: Persönlichkeitsmerkmale („Big Five“); Befindlichkeit (Einsamkeit, Selbstwertgefühl, Depressivität etc.); Gesundheit (allgemeiner Zustand, Erwerbsminderung, Nachtschlaf, Größe, Gewicht); Wichtigkeit von Lebensbereichen (Beruf, Familie etc.); allgemeine Lebenszufriedenheit und Zufriedenheit mit Schule/Beruf, Freizeitgestaltung, Freunden, Familie, finanzieller Situation; Netzwerkeinbindung (Anzahl der Freunde, Netzwerkgenerator); Freizeitgestaltung (verschiedene Aktivitäten); Religiosität (Glaubensgemeinschaft, Kirchgangshäufigkeit); Work-Life-Balance, kritische Lebensereignisse im sozialen Umfeld. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Geburtsdatum; Familienstand; Geburtsland und Nationalität; Geschwister; Verwandte; Bildung (Schullaufbahn, Abschluss); Erwerbsbiographie (berufliche Tätigkeiten, Stellung); Erwerbssituation (Arbeitszeitregelung, Befristung, Mehrfachtätigkeiten, Bedingungen am Arbeitsplatz, Pendeln, Elternzeit bzw. Wehr- oder Ersatzdienst); Einkommen (eigener Brutto- und Nettomonatsverdienst, Haushaltsnettoeinkommen, Bezug staatlicher Transferzahlungen, Unterhalt, Vermögenseinkommen, Bewertung der finanziellen Situation); Wohnbiographie ab dem 18. Lebensjahr (erster Auszug aus Elternhaus, Wohnorte in Bundesland und Land, Erst- und Zweitwohnsitz, Umzüge, Art des Haushalts, Besitzverhältnisse (Wohnstatus), Wohnfläche, Zimmerzahl, Wohnkosten, Anzahl der Übernachtungen); Haushaltszusammensetzung (Anzahl weiterer Personen im Haushalt, Geschlecht, Alter, Beziehung); Angaben zum aktuellen Partner (Geburtsdatum, Geburtsland und Nationalität, Bildung, Tätigkeit, berufliche Stellung, Kinder aus früheren Beziehungen, Wohnort); Angaben zu Kindern (Anzahl, Geschlecht, Geburtsdatum, Kindschaftsverhältnis/Status, Zusammenleben, Kontakt, zweites Elternteil, Gesundheitszustand, Betreuung); Angaben zu leiblichen Eltern und Stiefeltern (Geburtsdatum, Lebensstatus, ggf. Sterbedatum, Geburtsland und Nationalität, höchster Schul- und Ausbildungsabschluss, Familienstand, Partnerschaftsstatus,