12 research outputs found
Testing the Paleolithic-human-warfare hypothesis of blood-injectiion phobia in the Balitmore ECA Follow-up Study-Towards a more etiologically-based conceptualization for DSM-V
Objective:
The
research
agenda
for
the
fifth
edition
of
the
Diagnostic
and
Statistical
Manual
of
Mental
Disorders
(DSM-V)
has
emphasized
the
need
for a
more
etiologically-based
classification
system,
especially
for
stress-induced
and
fear-circuitry
disorders.
Testable
hypotheses
based
on
threats
to
survival
during
particular
segments
of
the
human
era
of
evolutionary
adaptedness
(EEA)
may
be
useful
in
developing a
brain-evolution-based
classification
for
the
wide
spectrum
of
disorders
ranging
from
disorders
which
are
mostly
overconsolidationally
such
as
PTSD,
to
fear-circuitry
disorders
which
are
mostly
innate
such
as
specific
phobias.
The
recently
presented
Paleolithic-human-warfare
hypothesis
posits
that
blood–injection
phobia
can
be
traced
to a
“survival
(fitness)
enhancing”
trait,
which
evolved
in
some
females
of
reproductive-age
during
the
millennia
of
intergroup
warfare
in
the
Paleolithic
EEA.
The
study
presented
here
tests
the
key a
priori
prediction
of
this
hypothesis—that
current
blood–injection
phobia
will
have
higher
prevalence
in
reproductive-age
women
than
in
post-menopausal
women.
Method:
The
Diagnostic
Interview
Schedule
(version
III-R)
,
which
included a
section
on
blood
and
injection
phobia,
was
administered
to
1920
subjects
in
the
Baltimore
ECA
Follow-up
Study.
Results:
Data
on
BII
phobia
was
available
on
1724
subjects
(1078
women
and
646
males)
.
The
prevalence
of
current
blood–
injection
phobia
was
3.3%
in
women
aged
27–49
and
1.1%
in
women
over
age
50
(OR
3.05,
95%
CI
1.20–7.73)
.
[The
corresponding
figures
for
males
were
0.8%
and
0.7%
(OR
1.19,
95%
CI
0.20–7.14)]
.
Conclusions:
This
epidemiological
study
provides
one
source
of
support
for
the
Paleolithic-human-warfare
(Paleolithic-threat)
hypothesis
regarding
the
evolutionary
(distal)
etiology
of
bloodletting-related
phobia,
and
may
contribute
to a
more
brain-
evolution-based
re-conceptualization
and
classification
of
this
fear
circuitry-related
trait
for
the
DSM-V.
In
addition,
the
finding
reported
here
may
also
stimulate
new
research
directions
on
more
proximal
mechanisms
which
can
lead
to
the
development
of
evidence-based
psychopharmacological
preventive
interventions
for
this
common
and
sometimes
disabling
fear-circuitry
disorder
Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease
Background: Experimental and clinical data suggest that reducing inflammation without affecting lipid levels may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Yet, the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis has remained unproved. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of canakinumab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β, involving 10,061 patients with previous myocardial infarction and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2 mg or more per liter. The trial compared three doses of canakinumab (50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, administered subcutaneously every 3 months) with placebo. The primary efficacy end point was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: At 48 months, the median reduction from baseline in the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level was 26 percentage points greater in the group that received the 50-mg dose of canakinumab, 37 percentage points greater in the 150-mg group, and 41 percentage points greater in the 300-mg group than in the placebo group. Canakinumab did not reduce lipid levels from baseline. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, the incidence rate for the primary end point was 4.50 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group, 4.11 events per 100 person-years in the 50-mg group, 3.86 events per 100 person-years in the 150-mg group, and 3.90 events per 100 person-years in the 300-mg group. The hazard ratios as compared with placebo were as follows: in the 50-mg group, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.07; P = 0.30); in the 150-mg group, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.98; P = 0.021); and in the 300-mg group, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.031). The 150-mg dose, but not the other doses, met the prespecified multiplicity-adjusted threshold for statistical significance for the primary end point and the secondary end point that additionally included hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization (hazard ratio vs. placebo, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; P = 0.005). Canakinumab was associated with a higher incidence of fatal infection than was placebo. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio for all canakinumab doses vs. placebo, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Antiinflammatory therapy targeting the interleukin-1β innate immunity pathway with canakinumab at a dose of 150 mg every 3 months led to a significantly lower rate of recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo, independent of lipid-level lowering. (Funded by Novartis; CANTOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01327846.
The prenatal origins of cancer
The concept that some childhood malignancies arise from postnatally persistent embryonal cells has a long history. Recent research has strengthened the links between driver mutations and embryonal and early postnatal development. This evidence, coupled with much greater detail on the cell of origin and the initial steps in embryonal cancer initiation, has identified important therapeutic targets and provided renewed interest in strategies for the early detection and prevention of childhood cancer. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved