248 research outputs found

    Steiner Distance in Product Networks

    Full text link
    For a connected graph GG of order at least 22 and SβŠ†V(G)S\subseteq V(G), the \emph{Steiner distance} dG(S)d_G(S) among the vertices of SS is the minimum size among all connected subgraphs whose vertex sets contain SS. Let nn and kk be two integers with 2≀k≀n2\leq k\leq n. Then the \emph{Steiner kk-eccentricity ek(v)e_k(v)} of a vertex vv of GG is defined by ek(v)=max⁑{dG(S)β€‰βˆ£β€‰SβŠ†V(G), ∣S∣=k,Β andΒ v∈S}e_k(v)=\max \{d_G(S)\,|\,S\subseteq V(G), \ |S|=k, \ and \ v\in S\}. Furthermore, the \emph{Steiner kk-diameter} of GG is sdiamk(G)=max⁑{ek(v)β€‰βˆ£β€‰v∈V(G)}sdiam_k(G)=\max \{e_k(v)\,|\, v\in V(G)\}. In this paper, we investigate the Steiner distance and Steiner kk-diameter of Cartesian and lexicographical product graphs. Also, we study the Steiner kk-diameter of some networks.Comment: 29 pages, 4 figure

    Matching Preclusion and Conditional Matching Preclusion Problems for Twisted Cubes

    Get PDF
    The matching preclusion number of a graph is the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in a graph that has neither perfect matchings nor almost-perfect matchings. For many interconnection networks, the optimal sets are precisely those induced by a single vertex. Recently, the conditional matching preclusion number of a graph was introduced to look for obstruction sets beyond those induced by a single vertex. It is defined to be the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in a graph with no isolated vertices that has neither perfect matchings nor almost-perfect matchings. In this paper, we find the matching preclusion number and the conditional matching preclusion number for twisted cubes, an improved version of the well-known hypercube. Moreover, we also classify all the optimal matching preclusion sets

    Conditional Strong Matching Preclusion of the Alternating Group Graph

    Get PDF
    The strong matching preclusion number of a graph is the minimum number of vertices and edges whose deletion results in a graph that has neither perfect matchings nor almost-perfect matchings. Park and Ihm introduced the problem of strong matching preclusion under the condition that no isolated vertex is created as a result of faults. In this paper, we find the conditional strong matching preclusion number for the nn-dimensional alternating group graph AGnAG_n

    The Conditional Strong Matching Preclusion of Augmented Cubes

    Get PDF
    The strong matching preclusion is a measure for the robustness of interconnection networks in the presence of node and/or link failures. However, in the case of random link and/or node failures, it is unlikely to find all the faults incident and/or adjacent to the same vertex. This motivates Park et al. to introduce the conditional strong matching preclusion of a graph. In this paper we consider the conditional strong matching preclusion problem of the augmented cube AQnAQ_n, which is a variation of the hypercube QnQ_n that possesses favorable properties

    Matching Preclusion of the Generalized Petersen Graph

    Get PDF
    The matching preclusion number of a graph with an even number of vertices is the minimum number of edges whose deletion results in a graph with no perfect matchings. In this paper we determine the matching preclusion number for the generalized Petersen graph P(n,k)P(n,k) and classify the optimal sets

    Fault diagnosability of regular graphs

    Get PDF
    An interconnection network\u27s diagnosability is an important measure of its self-diagnostic capability. In 2012, Peng et al. proposed a measure for fault diagnosis of the network, namely, the hh-good-neighbor conditional diagnosability, which requires that every fault-free node has at least hh fault-free neighbors. There are two well-known diagnostic models, PMC model and MM* model. The {\it hh-good-neighbor diagnosability} under the PMC (resp. MM*) model of a graph GG, denoted by thPMC(G)t_h^{PMC}(G) (resp. thMMβˆ—(G)t_h^{MM^*}(G)), is the maximum value of tt such that GG is hh-good-neighbor tt-diagnosable under the PMC (resp. MM*) model. In this paper, we study the 22-good-neighbor diagnosability of some general kk-regular kk-connected graphs GG under the PMC model and the MM* model. The main result t2PMC(G)=t2MMβˆ—(G)=g(kβˆ’1)βˆ’1t_2^{PMC}(G)=t_2^{MM^*}(G)=g(k-1)-1 with some acceptable conditions is obtained, where gg is the girth of GG. Furthermore, the following new results under the two models are obtained: t2PMC(HSn)=t2MMβˆ—(HSn)=4nβˆ’5t_2^{PMC}(HS_n)=t_2^{MM^*}(HS_n)=4n-5 for the hierarchical star network HSnHS_n, t2PMC(Sn2)=t2MMβˆ—(Sn2)=6nβˆ’13t_2^{PMC}(S_n^2)=t_2^{MM^*}(S_n^2)=6n-13 for the split-star networks Sn2S_n^2 and t2PMC(Ξ“n(Ξ”))=t2MMβˆ—(Ξ“n(Ξ”))=6nβˆ’16t_2^{PMC}(\Gamma_{n}(\Delta))=t_2^{MM^*}(\Gamma_{n}(\Delta))=6n-16 for the Cayley graph generated by the 22-tree Ξ“n(Ξ”)\Gamma_{n}(\Delta)
    • …
    corecore