176 research outputs found

    Decomposing the spatial and temporal effects of climate on bird populations in northern European mountains

    Get PDF
    The relationships between species abundance or occurrence versus spatial variation in climate are commonly used in species distribution models to forecast future distributions. Under "space-for-time substitution", the effects of climate variation on species are assumed to be equivalent in both space and time. Two unresolved issues of space-for-time substitution are the time period for species' responses and also the relative contributions of rapid- versus slow reactions in shaping spatial and temporal responses to climate change. To test the assumption of equivalence, we used a new approach of climate decomposition to separate variation in temperature and precipitation in Fennoscandia into spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal components over a 23-year period (1996-2018). We compiled information on land cover, topography, and six components of climate for 1756 fixed route surveys, and we modeled annual counts of 39 bird species breeding in the mountains of Fennoscandia. Local abundance of breeding birds was associated with the spatial components of climate as expected, but the temporal and spatiotemporal climatic variation from the current and previous breeding seasons were also important. The directions of the effects of the three climate components differed within and among species, suggesting that species can respond both rapidly and slowly to climate variation and that the responses represent different ecological processes. Thus, the assumption of equivalent species' response to spatial and temporal variation in climate was seldom met in our study system. Consequently, for the majority of our species, space-for-time substitution may only be applicable once the slow species' responses to a changing climate have occurred, whereas forecasts for the near future need to accommodate the temporal components of climate variation. However, appropriate forecast horizons for space-for-time substitution are rarely considered and may be difficult to reliably identify. Accurately predicting change is challenging because multiple ecological processes affect species distributions at different temporal scales

    Decomposing the spatial and temporal effects of climate on bird populations in northern European mountains

    Get PDF
    The relationships between species abundance or occurrence versus spatial variation in climate are commonly used in species distribution models to forecast future distributions. Under "space-for-time substitution", the effects of climate variation on species are assumed to be equivalent in both space and time. Two unresolved issues of space-for-time substitution are the time period for species' responses and also the relative contributions of rapid- versus slow reactions in shaping spatial and temporal responses to climate change. To test the assumption of equivalence, we used a new approach of climate decomposition to separate variation in temperature and precipitation in Fennoscandia into spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal components over a 23-year period (1996-2018). We compiled information on land cover, topography, and six components of climate for 1756 fixed route surveys, and we modeled annual counts of 39 bird species breeding in the mountains of Fennoscandia. Local abundance of breeding birds was associated with the spatial components of climate as expected, but the temporal and spatiotemporal climatic variation from the current and previous breeding seasons were also important. The directions of the effects of the three climate components differed within and among species, suggesting that species can respond both rapidly and slowly to climate variation and that the responses represent different ecological processes. Thus, the assumption of equivalent species' response to spatial and temporal variation in climate was seldom met in our study system. Consequently, for the majority of our species, space-for-time substitution may only be applicable once the slow species' responses to a changing climate have occurred, whereas forecasts for the near future need to accommodate the temporal components of climate variation. However, appropriate forecast horizons for space-for-time substitution are rarely considered and may be difficult to reliably identify. Accurately predicting change is challenging because multiple ecological processes affect species distributions at different temporal scales.Peer reviewe

    Decomposing the spatial and temporal effects of climate on bird populations in northern European mountains

    Get PDF
    The relationships between species abundance or occurrence versus spatial variation in climate are commonly used in species distribution models to forecast future distributions. Under "space-for-time substitution", the effects of climate variation on species are assumed to be equivalent in both space and time. Two unresolved issues of space-for-time substitution are the time period for species' responses and also the relative contributions of rapid- versus slow reactions in shaping spatial and temporal responses to climate change. To test the assumption of equivalence, we used a new approach of climate decomposition to separate variation in temperature and precipitation in Fennoscandia into spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal components over a 23-year period (1996-2018). We compiled information on land cover, topography, and six components of climate for 1756 fixed route surveys, and we modeled annual counts of 39 bird species breeding in the mountains of Fennoscandia. Local abundance of breeding birds was associated with the spatial components of climate as expected, but the temporal and spatiotemporal climatic variation from the current and previous breeding seasons were also important. The directions of the effects of the three climate components differed within and among species, suggesting that species can respond both rapidly and slowly to climate variation and that the responses represent different ecological processes. Thus, the assumption of equivalent species' response to spatial and temporal variation in climate was seldom met in our study system. Consequently, for the majority of our species, space-for-time substitution may only be applicable once the slow species' responses to a changing climate have occurred, whereas forecasts for the near future need to accommodate the temporal components of climate variation. However, appropriate forecast horizons for space-for-time substitution are rarely considered and may be difficult to reliably identify. Accurately predicting change is challenging because multiple ecological processes affect species distributions at different temporal scales

    Comparison of carbon balances between continuous-cover and clear-cut forestry in Sweden

    Get PDF
    Abstract Continuous-cover forestry (CCF) has been recognized for the production of multiple ecosystem services, and is seen as an alternative to clear-cut forestry (CF). Despite the increasing interest, it is still not well described how CCF would affect the carbon balance and the resulting climate benefit from the forest in relation to CF. This study compares carbon balances of CF and CCF, applied as two alternative land-use strategies for a heterogeneous Norway spruce (Picea abies) stand. We use a set of models to analyze the long-term effects of different forest management and wood use strategies in Sweden on carbon dioxide emissions and carbon stock changes. The results show that biomass growth and yield is more important than the choice of silvicultural system per se. When comparing CF and CCF assuming similar growth, extraction and product use, only minor differences in long-term climate benefit were found between the two principally different silvicultural systems

    Insect herbivory, organic matter deposition and effects on belowground organic matter fluxes in a central European oak forest

    Full text link
    Apart from the forest floor, the canopy of forested ecosystems functions as the second most important source for dissolved and particulate fractions of organic and inorganic C and N compounds. However, under mass outbreak situations of insect herbivores this flux path of organic matter is considerably intensified clearly exceeding C and N fluxes from the forest floor. In this paper we report on herbivore-altered C and N fluxes from the canopy to the forest floor and effects on forest floor nutrient fluxes during severe defoliating herbivory of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata) and the mottled umber moth (Eranis defoliaria) in an oak forest in Germany. Over the course of 6.5 months we followed the C and N fluxes with bulk deposition, throughfall solution, insect frass deposits (green-fall together with insect faeces) and with forest floor solution in an 117-yr-old oak (Quercus petraea) forest. Compared to the control, herbivore defoliation significantly enhanced throughfall inputs of total and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen by a factor of 3 and 2.5 (for TOC and DOC), and by 1.4 and 1.3 times (for TNb and DNb), respectively. Frass plus green-fall C and N fluxes peaked in May with 592 kg C ha(-1) and 33.5 kg N ha(-1) representing 79.6% (for C) and 78.3% (for N) of the total C and N input over 2.5 months. The quantitative and qualitative C and N input via faeces and litter deposition significantly differ between the insect affected and non-affected site. However, the C and N fluxes with throughfall did not significantly correlate with forest floor leachates. In this context, forest floor fluxes of TOC, DOC and NO3-N were significantly lower at the infested site compared to the control, whereas fluxes of NH4-N together with DON were significantly higher. The study demonstrates the importance of linking the population and associated frass dynamics of herbivorous insects with the cycling of nutrients and organic matter in forest ecosystems, highlighting the remarkable alterations in the timing, amounts and nature of organic matter dynamics on the ecosystem level. Consequently, the ecology of phytophagous insects allows partly to explain temporal-spatial alterations in nutrient cycling and thus ecosystem functioning.German Research Foundation (DFG) [MI 927/1-3
    corecore