Histamine release after intravenous application of short-acting hypnotics. A comparison of etomidate, Althesin (CT1341) and propanidid

The subject of histamine release was investigated in 16 volunteers by means of plasma histamine determination after the administration of etornidate, Althesin, propanidid, and Cremophor EL. Althesin and propanidid caused release of histamine in various degrees of frequency. Blood pressure changes were rather pronounced with both anaesthetic agents; tachycardia reached its maximum in the first and second minute, which seems to be an argument against histamine release as the underlying cause of this reaction. Histamine was, indeed, only released to such an extent (with the exception of one borderline case) that no clinical symptoms other than secretion of gastric juice and erythema were to be expected. After the application of etomidate and Cremophor EL an increase in plasma histamine was not detectable. Changes in the differential blood picture in terms of a decrease in basophils only occurred after Althesin and propanidid; not, however, after etomidate and Cremophor EL. Etomidate is, therefore, the first hypnotic drug for intravenous application which is unlikely to cause chemical histamine release

Effect of propofol and etomidate on normoxic and chronically hypoxic pulmonary artery

BACKGROUND: Chronic alveolar hypoxia results in sustained arterial constriction, and increase in pulmonary vascular resistance leading to pulmonary artery hypertension (PAHT). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of propofol and etomidate on pulmonary artery (PA) reactivity in chronically hypoxic (CH) rats, a model of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAHT), in normoxic animals, and human PA. METHODS: CH rats were maintained 14 days at 380 mmHg pressure in a hypobaric chamber. Human tissue was retrieved from histological lung pieces from patients undergoing resection for carcinoma. Cumulative concentrations of anaesthetics were tested on isolated vascular rings precontracted with phenylephrine (PHE) or 100 mM KCl. Statistical comparisons were done by ANOVA, followed, when needed, by Student t tests with Bonferroni correction as post-hoc tests. RESULTS: In normoxic rat PA, maximal relaxation (R(max)) induced by etomidate and propofol was 101.3 ± 0.8% and 94.0 ± 2.3%, respectively, in KCl-precontracted rings, and 63.3 ± 9.7% and 46.1 ± 9.1%, respectively, in PHE-precontracted rings (n = 7). In KCl-precontracted human PA, R(max )was 84.7 ± 8.6 % and 66.5 ± 11.8%, for etomidate and propofol, respectively, and 154.2 ± 22.4 % and 51.6 ± 15.1 %, respectively, in PHE-precontracted human PA (n = 7). In CH rat PA, the relaxant effect of both anaesthetics was increased in PHE-precontracted and, for etomidate only, in KCl-precontracted PA. In aorta, CH induced no change in the relaxant effect of anaesthetics. CONCLUSION: Propofol and etomidate have relaxant properties in PA from human and normoxic rat. The relaxant effect is specifically accentuated in PA from CH rat, mainly via an effect on the pharmacomechanical coupling. Etomidate appears to be more efficient than propofol at identical concentration, but, taking into account clinical concentrations, etomidate is less potent than propofol, which effect was in the range of clinical doses. Although these findings provide experimental support for the preferential use of etomidate for haemodynamic stability in patients suffering from PAHT, the clinical relevance of the observations requires further investigation

Histamine release in anaesthesia and surgery. premedication with H1- and H2-receptor antagonists: indications, benefits and possible problems

Our clinical and experimental studies have so far demonstrated, that the drugs used in anaesthesia; such as hypnotics, sedatives, narcotics or muscle relaxants, release histamine. The intravenous short acting anaesthetic etomidate has not shown either in experimental studies or in clinical use for 10 years any anaphylactoid reaction. The benzodiazepines are another group of drugs which appear not to release high amounts of histamine. Accurate studies on volunteers as well as on patients on the application of H1- and H2-receptor antagonists have demonstrated an effective inhibition of the anaphylactoid reaction. We suggest that in case of a history of allergy H1- and H2-receptor antagonists should be administered as a prophylactic premedication