57 research outputs found
Давньогрецький поліс в контексті соціально-політичних поглядів Платона та Аристотеля
У статті здійснено аналіз соціально-політичних засад розбудови грецького поліса в контексті поглядів Платона та Аристотеля.In this article accomplishes analyses of social and political bases of Greek polis development in the context of Platoon’s and Aristotle’s views
The mortality after release from incarceration consortium (MARIC): Protocol for a multi-national, individual participant data meta-analysis
Introduction More than 30 million adults are released from incarceration globally each year. Many experience complex physical and mental health problems, and are at markedly increased risk of preventable mortality. Despite this, evidence regarding the global epidemiology of mortality following release from incarceration is insufficient to inform the development of targeted, evidence-based responses. Many previous studies have suffered from inadequate power and poor precision, and even large studies have limited capacity to disaggregate data by specific causes of death, sub-populations or time since release to answer questions of clinical and public health relevance. Objectives To comprehensively document the incidence, timing, causes and risk factors for mortality in adults released from prison. Methods We created the Mortality After Release from Incarceration Consortium (MARIC), a multi-disciplinary collaboration representing 29 cohorts of adults who have experienced incarceration from 11 countries. Findings across cohorts will be analysed using a two-step, individual participant data meta-analysis methodology. Results The combined sample includes 1,337,993 individuals (89% male), with 75,795 deaths recorded over 9,191,393 person-years of follow-up. Conclusions The consortium represents an important advancement in the field, bringing international attention to this problem. It will provide internationally relevant evidence to guide policymakers and clinicians in reducing preventable deaths in this marginalized population
“Medically unexplained” symptoms and symptom disorders in primary care: prognosis-based recognition and classification
Background: Many patients consult their GP because they experience bodily symptoms. In a substantial proportion of
cases, the clinical picture does not meet the existing diagnostic criteria for diseases or disorders. This may be because
symptoms are recent and evolving or because symptoms are persistent but, either by their character or the negative
results of clinical investigation cannot be attributed to disease: so-called “medically unexplained symptoms” (MUS).
MUS are inconsistently recognised, diagnosed and managed in primary care. The specialist classification systems
for MUS pose several problems in a primary care setting. The systems generally require great certainty about
presence or absence of physical disease, they tend to be mind-body dualistic, and they view symptoms from a
narrow specialty determined perspective. We need a new classification of MUS in primary care; a classification
that better supports clinical decision-making, creates clearer communication and provides scientific underpinning
of research to ensure effective interventions.
Discussion: We propose a classification of symptoms that places greater emphasis on prognostic factors.
Prognosis-based classification aims to categorise the patient’s risk of ongoing symptoms, complications, increased
healthcare use or disability because of the symptoms. Current evidence suggests several factors which may be
used: symptom characteristics such as: number, multi-system pattern, frequency, severity. Other factors are:
concurrent mental disorders, psychological features and demographic data. We discuss how these characteristics may
be used to classify symptoms into three groups: self-limiting symptoms, recurrent and persistent symptoms, and
symptom disorders. The middle group is especially relevant in primary care; as these patients generally have reduced
quality of life but often go unrecognised and are at risk of iatrogenic harm. The presented characteristics do not
contain immediately obvious cut-points, and the assessment of prognosis depends on a combination of several factors.
Conclusion: Three criteria (multiple symptoms, multiple systems, multiple times) may support the classification into
good, intermediate and poor prognosis when dealing with symptoms in primary care. The proposed new classification
specifically targets the patient population in primary care and may provide a rational framework for decision-making in
clinical practice and for epidemiologic and clinical research of symptoms
Reconciling disparate prevalence rates of PTSD in large samples of US male Vietnam veterans and their controls
BACKGROUND: Two large independent studies funded by the US government have assessed the impact of the Vietnam War on the prevalence of PTSD in US veterans. The National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study (NVVRS) estimated the current PTSD prevalence to be 15.2% while the Vietnam Experience Study (VES) estimated the prevalence to be 2.2%. We compared alternative criteria for estimating the prevalence of PTSD using the NVVRS and VES public use data sets collected more than 10 years after the United States withdrew troops from Vietnam. METHODS: We applied uniform diagnostic procedures to the male veterans from the NVVRS and VES to estimate PTSD prevalences based on varying criteria including one-month and lifetime prevalence estimates, combat and non-combat prevalence estimates, and prevalence estimates using both single and multiple indicator models. RESULTS: Using a narrow and specific set of criteria, we derived current prevalence estimates for combat-related PTSD of 2.5% and 2.9% for the VES and the NVVRS, respectively. Using a more broad and sensitive set of criteria, we derived current prevalence estimates for combat-related PTSD of 12.2% and 15.8% for the VES and NVVRS, respectively. CONCLUSION: When comparable methods were applied to available data we reconciled disparate results and estimated similar current prevalences for both narrow and broad definitions of combat-related diagnoses of PTSD
Follow-up of contacts of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus–infected returning travelers, the Netherlands, 2014
Notification of 2 imported cases of infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the Netherlands triggered comprehensive monitoring of contacts. Observed low rates of virus transmission and the psychological effect of contact monitoring indicate that thoughtful assessment of close contacts is prudent and must be guided by clinical and epidemiologic risk factors
Peer Support and Individuals with Sexual Convictions: Complementing Traditional Rehabilitation Strategies
Determining the Optimal Number of Alternatives to a Multiple-Choice Test Item: An Information Theoretic Perspective
Reoffending After Release: Does Procedural Justice During Imprisonment Matter?
Reoffending rates after release from prison are high in most Western countries. Knowledge on how certain aspects of prison life affect postrelease recidivism could be useful to effective crime-control. One aspect of prison life that may potentially affect prisoners’ reoffending behavior refers to the extent to which prisoners feel treated fairly and respectfully. This notion is central to procedural justice theories, which argue that people will be more likely to comply with the law when they feel treated in a just and decent way by actors who enforce the law. At present, it is unknown whether or not a procedurally just treatment during imprisonment can reduce postprison reoffending rates. This study examined (a) whether prisoners’ procedural justice perceptions influence their postrelease offending behavior, and (b) whether the relationship between procedural justice and reoffending was mediated by prisoners’ perceived legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Associations were explored with survey and registered conviction data of 1,241 Dutch prisoners from the Prison Project. Although the effect was small, prisoners who felt treated in a procedurally just manner during imprisonment were less likely to be reconvicted in the 18 months after release. No evidence was found for a mediating role of legitimacy
Criminal defendants' satisfaction with lawyers : Perceptions of procedural fairness and effort of the lawyer
At present, procedural justice theory has predominantly been used to explain defendants' satisfaction with the police, courts and prisons. It is unclear to what extent this theory is also applicable to lawyers. This study investigates to what extent (1) criminal defendants are satisfied with their lawyers and (2) procedural fairness characteristics and the effort of the lawyer are related to defendants' satisfaction with their lawyers. Data from the Prison Project were used: a large-scale research project among Dutch criminal defendants (N = 1479). Results suggest that generally, Dutch defendants are very satisfied with their lawyers. Variation in defendants' satisfaction with their lawyers can be attributed for a substantial part to procedural fairness characteristics
A social building? Prison architecture and staff-prisoner relationships
Relationships between correctional officers and prisoners are crucial to life in prison, and affect prison order and prisoners' well-being. Research on factors influencing staff-prisoner relationships is scarce and has not included the design of prison buildings. This study examined the association between prison architecture and prisoners' perceptions of their relationships with officers. Data were used from the Prison Project, a large-scale study in which 1,715 prisoners held in 117 units in 32 Dutch remand centers were surveyed. Multilevel analyses showed that prison layout was related to officer-prisoner relationships: Prisoners in panopticon layouts were less positive than prisoners in other layouts. In addition, prisoners housed in older units and in units with more double cells were less positive about officer-prisoner interactions
- …