362 research outputs found
Symbiosis through exploitation and the merger of lineages in evolution
A model for the coevolution of two species in facultative symbiosis is used to investigate conditions under which species merge to form a single reproductive unit. Two traits evolve in each species, the first affecting loss of resources from an individual to its partner, and the second affecting vertical transmission of the symbiosis from one generation to the next. Initial conditions are set so that the symbiosis involves exploitation of one partner by the other and vertical transmission is very rare. It is shown that, even in the face of continuing exploitation, a stable symbiotic unit can evolve with maximum vertical transmission of the partners. Such evolution requires that eventually deaths should exceed births for both species in the free-living state, a condition which can be met if the victim, in the course of developing its defences, builds up sufficiently large costs in the free-living state. This result expands the set of initial conditions from which separate lineages can be expected to merge into symbiotic units
On the sympatric evolution and evolutionary stability of coexistence by relative nonlinearity of competition
If two species exhibit different nonlinear responses to a single shared
resource, and if each species modifies the resource dynamics such that this
favors its competitor, they may stably coexist. This coexistence mechanism,
known as relative nonlinearity of competition, is well understood
theoretically, but less is known about its evolutionary properties and its
prevalence in real communities. We address this challenge by using adaptive
dynamics theory and individual-based simulations to compare community
stabilization and evolutionary stability of species that coexist by relative
nonlinearity. In our analysis, evolution operates on the species'
density-compensation strategies, and we consider a trade-off between population
growth rates at high and low resource availability. We confirm previous
findings that, irrespective of the particular model of density dependence,
there are many combinations of overcompensating and undercompensating
density-compensation strategies that allow stable coexistence by relative
nonlinearity. However, our analysis also shows that most of these strategy
combinations are not evolutionarily stable and will be outcompeted by an
intermediate density-compensation strategy. Only very specific trade-offs lead
to evolutionarily stable coexistence by relative nonlinearity. As we find no
reason why these particular trade-offs should be common in nature, we conclude
that the sympatric evolution and evolutionary stability of relative
nonlinearity, while possible in principle, seems rather unlikely. We speculate
that this may, at least in part, explain why empirical demonstrations of this
coexistence mechanism are rare, noting, however, that the difficulty to detect
relative nonlinearity in the field [...]Comment: PLOS ONE, in pres
Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation
Studies of cooperation have traditionally focused on discrete games such as
the well-known prisoner's dilemma, in which players choose between two pure
strategies: cooperation and defection. Increasingly, however, cooperation is
being studied in continuous games that feature a continuum of strategies
determining the level of cooperative investment. For the continuous snowdrift
game, it has been shown that a gradually evolving monomorphic population may
undergo evolutionary branching, resulting in the emergence of a defector
strategy that coexists with a cooperator strategy. This phenomenon has been
dubbed the 'tragedy of the commune'. Here we study the effects of fluctuating
group size on the tragedy of the commune and derive analytical conditions for
evolutionary branching. Our results show that the effects of fluctuating group
size on evolutionary dynamics critically depend on the structure of payoff
functions. For games with additively separable benefits and costs, fluctuations
in group size make evolutionary branching less likely, and sufficiently large
fluctuations in group size can always turn an evolutionary branching point into
a locally evolutionarily stable strategy. For games with multiplicatively
separable benefits and costs, fluctuations in group size can either prevent or
induce the tragedy of the commune. For games with general interactions between
benefits and costs, we derive a general classification scheme based on second
derivatives of the payoff function, to elucidate when fluctuations in group
size help or hinder cooperation.Comment: 22 pages, 5 figure
Resource heterogeneity can facilitate cooperation
Although social structure is known to promote cooperation, by locally exposing selfish agents to their own deeds, studies to date assumed that all agents have access to the same level of resources. This is clearly unrealistic. Here we find that cooperation can be maintained when some agents have access to more resources than others. Cooperation can then emerge even in populations in which the temptation to defect is so strong that players would act fully selfishly if their resources were distributed uniformly. Resource heterogeneity can thus be crucial for the emergence and maintenance of cooperation. We also show that resource heterogeneity can hinder cooperation once the temptation to defect is significantly lowered. In all cases, the level of cooperation can be maximized by managing resource heterogeneity
Intermediate landscape disturbance maximizes metapopulation density
The viability of metapopulations in fragmented landscapes has become a central theme in conservation biology. Landscape fragmentation is increasingly recognized as a dynamical process: in many situations, the quality of local habitats must be expected to undergo continual changes. Here we assess the implications of such recurrent local disturbances for the equilibrium density of metapopulations. Using a spatially explicit lattice model in which the considered metapopulation as well as the underlying landscape pattern change dynamically, we show that equilibrium metapopulation density is maximized at intermediate frequencies of local landscape disturbance. On both sides around this maximum, the metapopulation may go extinct. We show how the position and shape of the intermediate viability maximum is responding to changes in the landscapeâs overall habitat quality and the populationâs propensity for local extinction. We interpret our findings in terms of a dual effect of intensified landscape disturbances, which on the one hand exterminate local populations and on the other hand enhance a metapopulationâs capacity for spreading between habitat clusters
Five main phases of landscape degradation revealed by a dynamic mesoscale model analysing the splitting, shrinking, and disappearing of habitat patches
The ecological consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation have been intensively studied on a broad, landscape-wide scale, but have less been investigated on the finer scale of individual habitat patches, especially when considering dynamic turnovers in the habitability of sites. We study changes to individual patches from the perspective of the inhabitant organisms requiring a minimum area for survival. With patches given by contiguous assemblages of discrete habitat sites, the removal of a single site necessarily causes one of the following three elementary local events in the affected patch: splitting into two or more pieces, shrinkage without splitting, or complete disappearance. We investigate the probabilities of these events and the effective size of the habitat removed by them from the population's living area as the habitat landscape gradually transitions from pristine to totally destroyed. On this basis, we report the following findings. First, we distinguish four transitions delimiting five main phases of landscape degradation: (1) when there is only a little habitat loss, the most frequent event is the shrinkage of the spanning patch; (2) with more habitat loss, splitting becomes significant; (3) splitting peaks; (4) the remaining patches shrink; and (5) finally, they gradually disappear. Second, organisms that require large patches are especially sensitive to phase 3. This phase emerges at a value of habitat loss that is well above the percolation threshold. Third, the effective habitat loss caused by the removal of a single habitat site can be several times higher than the actual habitat loss. For organisms requiring only small patches, this amplification of losses is highest during phase 4 of the landscape degradation, whereas for organisms requiring large patches, it peaks during phase 3
Shared rewarding overcomes defection traps in generalized volunteer's dilemmas
For societies to produce or safeguard public goods, costly voluntary
contributions are often required. From the perspective of each individual,
however, it is advantageous not to volunteer such contributions, in the hope
that other individuals will carry the associated costs. This conflict can be
modeled as a volunteer's dilemma. To encourage rational individuals to make
voluntary contributions, a government or other social organizations can offer
rewards, to be shared among the volunteers. Here we apply such shared rewarding
to the generalized volunteer's dilemma, in which a threshold number of
volunteers is required for producing the public good. By means of theoretical
and numerical analyses, we show that without shared rewarding only two
evolutionary outcomes are possible: full defection or coexistence of volunteers
and non-volunteers. We show that already small rewards destabilize full
defection, stabilizing small fractions of volunteers instead. Furthermore, at
these intermediate reward levels, we find a hysteresis effect such that
increasing or decreasing group sizes can trigger different social outcomes. In
particular, when group size is increased, the fraction of volunteers first
increases gradually before jumping up abruptly; when group size is then
decreased again, the fraction of volunteers not only remains high, but even
continues to increase. As the shared reward is increased beyond a critical
level, the bi-stability underlying this hysteresis effect vanishes altogether,
and only a single social outcome remains, corresponding to the stable
coexistence of volunteers and non-volunteers. We find that this critical level
of shared rewarding is relatively small compared to the total cost of
contributing to the public good. These results show that the introduction of
shared rewarding is remarkably effective in overcoming defection traps in the
generalized volunteer's dilemma.Comment: 22 pages, 3 figures, accepted by Journal of Theoretical Biolog
- âŚ