Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Comparison of postoperative outcomes of milrinone versus dobutamine in tetralogy of Fallot with transannular patch

Background: Since the original description of TOF, its management modalities are continuously evolving. Present modality includes complete correction of the pathology by intra-cardiac repair with or without using transannular patch. Various finer aspects of intraoperative and postoperative management of the TOF repair are still evolving. Aims and Objectives: In this single centre study we are aiming to compare short term outcomes in patients of tof operated with transannular patch repair treated postoperatively with dobutamine vs milrinone. Materials and Methods: Total 100 patients undergoing TOF repair with transannular patch were grouped with respect to the inotropes used. One group who received milrinone and other who received dobutamine. Postoperative outcomes depending upon the need of other inotropic support, duration of ventilatory support, icu stay , inotropic support , hospital stay , morbidity and mortality are compared between the groups. Observations: No significant difference was seen in both groups for mean ventilation time, duration of icu and hospital stay. Only parameter which was significant was increase in usage of adjuvant inotropic support in milrinone group which were depicted in terms of increased VIS ( Vasoactive inotrope score). Almost equal incidence of adverse events were noted in both the groups. Conclusion: Milrinone and dobutamine are fairly comparable to each other in cases of TOF repair with transannular patch. Dobutamine being a cheaper alternative have a better scope in developing countries like India