The Judean desert monasteries in the Byzantine period

Reviewed Book: Hirschfeld, Yizhar. The Judean desert monasteries in the Byzantine period. New Haven: Yale Univ Pr, 1992

The molecular content of the nearby galaxy from IRAS and HI observations

Because infrared emission is a very good tracer of mass at high latitudes, by combining it with HI observations it provides a convenient though indirect way of observing the spatial distribution of molecular material. Moreover, these observations will premit placing limits on the fraction of total infrared luminosity emitted by dust associated with molecular and atomic hydrogen clouds. A preliminary result from the study of the correlation between HI column density and 100 micron infrared flux density as measured by the IRAS satellite is reported. The ratio F100/W(HI) = R has an average value of roughty 17 KJy/sr/(K km/s) over the whole sky. Bright regions in the FIR such as the Galactic plane and HII regions are excluded from the data. The histogram of the number of pixels vs R has a strong peak near 17 (same units as before) and is asymmetric about this mean value, having a tail at higher values of R. This basic shape is fairly independent of the region of the sky we observe. The peak confirms the general correlation between infrared emission and HI column density reported previously. One way to explain the shape of the distribution is to assume a constant dust to gas mass ratio and a constant interstellar radiation field and associate points in the tail with molecular clouds. In this case the ratio R is higher for points in the tail because it does not account for the column density of molecular hydrogen

Memorandum for the Press

Press release from J. R. Eakin about construction of Desert View road

Justice, Claims and Prioritarianism: Room for Desert?

Does individual desert matter for distributive justice? Is it relevant, for purposes of justice, that the pattern of distribution of justice’s “currency” (be it well-being, resources, preference-satisfaction, capabilities, or something else) is aligned in one or another way with the pattern of individual desert? This paper examines the nexus between desert and distributive justice through the lens of individual claims. The concept of claims (specifically “claims across outcomes”) is a fruitful way to flesh out the content of distributive justice so as to be grounded in the separateness of persons. A claim is a relation between a person and a pair of outcomes. If someone is better off in one outcome than a second, she has a claim in favor of the first. If she is equally well off in the two outcomes, she has a null claim between the two. In turn, whether one outcome is more just than a second depends upon the pattern of claims between them. In prior work, I have elaborated the concept of claims across outcomes, and have used it to provide a unified defense of the Pareto and Pigou-Dalton axioms. Adding some further, plausible, axioms, we arrive at prioritarianism. Here, I consider the possibility of desert-modulated claims—whereby the strength of an individual’s claim between two outcomes is determined not only by her well-being levels in the two outcomes, and her well-being difference between them, but also by her desert. This generalization of the notion of claims suggests a new axiom of justice: Priority for the More Deserving, requiring that, as between two individuals at the same well-being level, a given increment in well-being be allocated to the more deserving one. If individual desert is intrapersonally fixed, this new axiom, together with a desert-modulated version of the Pigou-Dalton principle, and the Pareto axioms, yields a desert-modulated prioritarian account of distributive justice. Trouble arises, however, if an individual’s desert level can be different in different outcomes. In this case of intrapersonally variable desert, Priority for the More Deserving can conflict with the Pareto axioms (both Pareto indifference and strong Pareto). This conflict, I believe, is sufficient reason to abandon the proposal to make claim strength a function of individual desert on top of well-being levels and differences. If distributive justice is truly sensitive to each individual’s separate perspective—if the justice ranking of outcomes is built up from the totality of individual rankings—we should embrace the Pareto axioms as axioms of justice and reject Priority for the More Deserving. In short: desert-modulated prioritarianism is a nonstarter. Rawls was right to sever distributive justice from desert

The Unecessary Pastor: Rediscovering the Call

Author: Dawn, Marva J. Title: Unnecessary pastor. Publisher: Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000

A Body Broken for a Broken People: Divorce, Remarriage, and the Eucharist

Book Review by Angela McCarthy. Francis J MOLONEY. A Body Broken for a Broken People: Divorce, Remarriage, and the Eucharist, New York: Paulist Press, 3rd ed., 2015

2010 Adaptive management report

The Desert Conservation Program administers the incidental take permit issued in 2001 by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in accordance with the Endangered Species Act. Compliance with the permit requires implementation of the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. This plan requires an adaptive management program and a biennial report by an independent science advisor to assess the status of the plan and make recommendations for future funding. This 2010 Adaptive Management Report reviews current data on land use trends, habitat loss, species status and plan implementation, and makes recommendations for the future