39 research outputs found
The UNFCCC at a Crossroads: Can Increased Involvement of Business and Industry Help Rescue the Multilateral Climate Regime?
Recommended from our members
Reply to Kelman: The foundations for studying catastrophic climate risks
Recommended from our members
Reply to Bhowmik et al.: Democratic climate action and studying extreme climate risks are not in tension
[no abstract available
Recommended from our members
Reply to Ruhl and Craig: Assessing and governing extreme climate risks needs to be legitimate and democratic
[No abstract available
Recommended from our members
Reply to Burgess et al: Catastrophic climate risks are neglected, plausible, and safe to study
Three decades of climate mitigation: why haven't we bent the global emissions curve?
Despite three decades of political efforts and a wealth of research on the causes and catastrophic impacts of climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise and are 60% higher today than they were in 1990. Exploring this rise through nine thematic lenses—covering issues of climate governance, the fossil fuel industry, geopolitics, economics, mitigation modeling, energy systems, inequity, lifestyles, and social imaginaries—draws out multifaceted reasons for our collective failure to bend the global emissions curve. However, a common thread that emerges across the reviewed literature is the central role of power, manifest in many forms, from a dogmatic political-economic hegemony and influential vested interests to narrow techno-economic mindsets and ideologies of control. Synthesizing the various impediments to mitigation reveals how delivering on the commitments enshrined in the Paris Agreement now requires an urgent and unprecedented transformation away from today's carbon- and energy-intensive development paradigm