80 research outputs found
ENGAGING CLINICIANS IN A PRE-IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT OF THE WOMEN & PERSON-EMPOWERED COMMUNITY ACCESS FOR REPRODUCTIVE EQUITY (WE CARE) INTERVENTION
Objectives: To assess cliniciansâ perspectives on WE CARE (an emergency department (ED) family planning counseling and referral intervention that uses an online health tool and community health workers) to inform intervention design for implementation.
Methods: We conducted one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, and Obstetrics & Gynecology clinicians until thematic saturation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) informed the interview guide and was used to code all transcripts. A CFIR expert conducted an external coding audit.
Results: We interviewed 30 clinicians (female (77%), ED staff (47%), white (63%), and attending physicians (43%)). WE CARE was highly acceptable. Dominant CFIR domains include: (1) Clinicians suggested Design Quality and Packaging modifications, particularly the referral processes, to promote successful implementation; (2) transportation and insurance were essential Patient Needs and Resources; (3) WE CARE was Compatible with the Value of âno missed opportunityâ to help patients; (4) Compatibility with Work Processes â WE CARE posed scheduling and reimbursement challenges to clinics; (5) Clinicians expressed concerns about an ED Culture of reproductive health frustrations, resistance to change, and competing priorities. Others identified the ED âsafety netâ culture and long wait times as assets to the intervention; (6) WE CARE had a significant Relative Advantage over the status quo. A few clinicians identified more advantageous alternatives (e.g., WE CARE in the clinic, home, or community settings); (7) Engaging Key Stakeholders throughout the hospital was a critical implementation element.
Conclusions: Clinicians contextualized several implementation constructs relevant to designing and implementing an ED family planning intervention
Quality of Care in Contraceptive Services Provided to Young People in Two Ugandan Districts: A Simulated Client Study
BACKGROUND: Low and inconsistent use of contraceptives by young people contributes to unintended pregnancies. This study assessed quality of contraceptive services for young people aged 15-24 in two rural districts in Uganda. METHODS: Five female and two male simulated clients (SCs) interacted with 128 providers at public, private not-for-profit (PNFP), and private for profit (PFP) health facilities. After consultations, SCs were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Six aspects of quality of care (client's needs, choice of contraceptive methods, information given to users, client-provider interpersonal relations, constellation of services, and continuity mechanisms) were assessed. Descriptive statistics and factor analysis were performed. RESULTS: Means and categorized quality scores for all aspects of quality were low in both public and private facilities. The lowest quality scores were observed in PFP, and medium scores in PNFP facilities. The choice of contraceptive methods and interpersonal relations quality scores were slightly higher in public facilities. Needs assessment scores were highest in PNFP facilities. All facilities were classified as having low scores for appropriate constellation of services. Information given to users was suboptimal and providers promoted specific contraceptive methods. Minority of providers offered preferred method of choice and showed respect for privacy. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of contraceptive services provided to young people was low. Concurrent quality improvements and strengthening of health systems are needed
The professionalism disconnect: Do entering residents identify yet participate in unprofessional behaviors?
Background
Professionalism has been an important tenet of medical education, yet defining it is a challenge. Perceptions of professional behavior may vary by individual, medical specialty, demographic group and institution. Understanding these differences should help institutions better clarify professionalism expectations and provide standards with which to evaluate resident behavior.
Methods
Duke University Hospital and Vidant Medical Center/East Carolina University surveyed entering PGY1 residents. Residents were queried on two issues: their perception of the professionalism of 46 specific behaviors related to training and patient care; and their own participation in those specified behaviors. The study reports data analyses for gender and institution based upon survey results in 2009 and 2010. The study received approval by the Institutional Review Boards of both institutions.
Results
76% (375) of 495 PGY1 residents surveyed in 2009 and 2010 responded. A majority of responders rated all 46 specified behaviors as unprofessional, and a majority had either observed or participated in each behavior. For all 46 behaviors, a greater percentage of women rated the behaviors as unprofessional. Men were more likely than women to have participated in behaviors. There were several significant differences in both the perceptions of specified behaviors and in self-reported observation of and/or involvement in those behaviors between institutions.
Respondents indicated the most important professionalism issues relevant to medical practice include: respect for colleagues/patients, relationships with pharmaceutical companies, balancing home/work life, and admitting mistakes. They reported that professionalism can best be assessed by peers, patients, observation of non-medical work and timeliness/detail of paperwork.
Conclusion
Defining professionalism in measurable terms is a challenge yet critical in order for it to be taught and assessed. Recognition of the differences by gender and institution should allow for tailored teaching and assessment of professionalism so that it is most meaningful. A shared understanding of what constitutes professional behavior is an important first step
Sociocultural Determinants of Teenage Childbearing Among Latinas in California
Objectives U.S. Latinas have a persistently high rate of teenage childbearing, which is associated with adverse outcomes for both mother and child. This study was designed to investigate the roles of socioeconomic factors and acculturation in teenage childbearing in this population. Methods Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of measures of acculturation (language spoken at home, nativity, and age at immigration) and respondentsâ parentsâ education with age at first birth in a stratified sample of post-partum women in California. Results The unadjusted odds ratio for teenage birth for Latinas versus non-Latina Whites was 5.2 (95% CI 4.1â6.6). Nativity was not significantly associated with teen birth, but speaking Spanish at home was positively associated and immigrating at a later age was negatively associated with teen birth. Overall, these measures of acculturation accounted for 17% (95% CI 8â28%) of the difference in odds of teen birth between Latinas and non-Latina Whites. Higher levels of education among respondentsâ parents had differentially protective effects across the racial/ethnic groups. Controlling for disparities in respondentsâ parentsâ education without changing its differential effects across racial/ethnic groups reduced the odds ratio for Latinas compared to non-Latina Whites by 30% (95% CI 14â60%). Conclusion These findings call into question common assumptions about the protective effect of acculturation on teen fertility and suggest that improving childhood socioeconomic factors among Latinas may decrease teen childbearing
Recommended from our members
Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review
BACKGROUND: Intra-uterine contraception (IUC) involves the use of an intra-uterine device (IUD), a highly effective, long-acting, reversible contraceptive method. Historically, the popularity of IUC has waxed and waned across different world regions, due to policy choices and shifts in public opinion. However, despite its advantages and cost-effectiveness for programmes, IUC's contribution to contraceptive prevalence is currently negligible in many countries. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of the global literature on provider and lay perspectives on IUC. It aims to shed light on the reasons for low use of IUC and reflect on potential opportunities for the method's promotion.
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in four peer-reviewed journals and four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, and Global Health). Screening resulted in the inclusion of 68 relevant publications.
RESULTS: Most included studies were conducted in areas where IUD use is moderate or low. Findings are similar across these areas. Many providers have low or uneven levels of knowledge on IUC and limited training. Many wrongly believe that IUC entails serious side effects such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and are reluctant to provide it to entire eligible categories, such as HIV-positive women. There is particular resistance to providing IUC to teenagers and nulliparae. Provider opinions may be more favourable towards the hormonal IUD. Some health-care providers choose IUC for themselves. Many members of the public have low knowledge and unfounded misconceptions about IUC, such as the fear of infertility. Some are concerned about the insertion and removal processes, and about its effect on menses. However, users of IUC are generally satisfied and report a number of benefits. Peers and providers exert a strong influence on women's attitudes.
CONCLUSION: Both providers and lay people have inaccurate knowledge and misconceptions about IUC, which contribute to explaining its low use. However, many reported concerns and fears could be alleviated through correct information. Concerted efforts to train providers, combined with demand creation initiatives, could therefore boost the method's popularity. Further research is needed on provider and lay perspectives on IUDs in low- and middle-income countries
Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care problems
Contains fulltext :
136814.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Patient-centered care requires different approaches depending on the clinical situation. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making provide practical and well-described methods to accomplish patient-centered care in the context of situations where medical evidence supports specific behavior changes and the most appropriate action is dependent on the patient's preferences. Many clinical consultations may require elements of both approaches, however. This article describes these 2 approaches-one to address ambivalence to medically indicated behavior change and the other to support patients in making health care decisions in cases where there is more than one reasonable option-and discusses how clinicians can draw on these approaches alone and in combination to achieve patient-centered care across the range of health care problems
Medical Liability Insurance as a Barrier to the Provision of Abortion Services in Family Medicine
Family physicians who wish to provide abortions have been subject to both denial
of coverage by medical liability insurers and the imposition of large premium
increases. These policy decisions by insurance companies raise questions about
the role of family physicians in abortion care and about the autonomy of medical
specialties in defining their scope of practice
- âŠ