Prevalence of Escherichia coli carriage in the oropharynx of ambulatory children and adults with and without upper respiratory symptoms

[No abstract available

Acute cholangitis: Diagnosis and management

International audienceAcute cholangitis is an infection of the bile and biliary tract which in most cases is the consequence of biliary tract obstruction. The two main causes are choledocholithiasis and neoplasia. Clinical diagnosis relies on Charcot's triad (pain, fever, jaundice) but the insufficient sensitivity of the latter led to the introduction in 2007 of a new score validated by the Tokyo Guidelines, which includes biological and radiological data. In case of clinical suspicion, abdominal ultrasound quickly explores the biliary tract, but its diagnostic capacities are poor, especially in case of non-gallstone obstruction, as opposed to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound, of which the diagnostic capacities are excellent. CT scan is more widely available, with intermediate diagnostic capacities. Bacteriological sampling through blood cultures (positive in 40% of cases) and bile cultures is essential. A wide variety of bacteria are involved, but the main pathogens having been found are Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., justifying first-line antimicrobial therapy by a third-generation cephalosporin. Systematic coverage of Enterococcus spp. and anaerobic infections remains debated, and is usually recommended, in case of severity criteria for Enterococcus severity levels, or anaerobic bilio-digestive anastomosis for anaerobes. Presence of a biliary stent is the only identified risk-factor associated with infections by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Along with antimicrobial therapy, endoscopic or radiological biliary drainage is a crucial management component. Despite improved management, mortality in cases of acute cholangitis remains approximately 5%

The intravenous vancomycin prescription practices of French infectious disease specialists: A cross-sectional observational study

International audienceINTRODUCTION: Vancomycin prescription modalities remain non-consensual. We examined and evaluated the vancomycin prescription habits of infectious disease specialists in France. METHODS: Through an anonymized online questionnaire sent to members of the French Infectious Diseases Society, detailed information on vancomycin prescription modalities was collected. RESULTS: Out of the 712 physicians contacted, 179 (25%) completed the questionnaire; 174 (97%) of them routinely prescribed intravenous vancomycin: 95 (55%) by continuous infusion only, 12 (7%) by intermittent infusion, while 67 (38%) used the two modalities. Among continuous administration users, 157 (97%) applied a loading dose of 15 mg/kg or less (n = 80, 49%), 20-25 mg/kg (n = 33, 20%), or 30 mg/kg or more (n = 45, 28%); 143 (88%) used a maintenance dosage of 30 mg/kg/day and 157 (97%) carried out drug monitoring. CONCLUSION: In France, infectious disease specialists favor continuous administration of vancomycin using a loading dose, with systematic monitoring of vancomycin serum concentrations

Activity of fosfomycin alone or combined with temocillin in vitro and in a murine model of peritonitis due to KPC-3- or OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli

International audienceBackground - Alternative therapeutic regimens are urgently needed against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Fosfomycin often remains active against KPC and OXA-48 producers, but emergence of resistance is a major limitation. Our aim was to determine whether the association of temocillin with fosfomycin might be useful to treat KPC- or OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli infections. Methods - Isogenic derivatives of E. coli CFT073 with blaKPC-3- or blaOXA-48-harbouring plasmids (named CFT073-KPC-3 and CFT073-OXA-48, respectively) were used. The addition of temocillin to fosfomycin was tested using the chequerboard method and time-kill curves as well as in a fatal peritonitis murine model. Mice were treated for 24 h with fosfomycin alone or in combination with temocillin. Bacterial loads, before and after treatment, were determined in the peritoneal fluid and fosfomycin-resistant mutants were detected. Results - Temocillin MICs were 8, 32 and 256 mg/L for CFT073 (WT), CFT073-KPC-3 and CFT073-OXA-48, respectively. Fosfomycin MIC was 0.5 mg/L for all strains. The chequerboard experiments demonstrated synergy for all three strains. In time-kill curves, combining temocillin with fosfomycin was synergistic, bactericidal and prevented emergence of resistance for CFT073-pTOPO and CFT073-KPC-3, but not CFT073-OXA-48. In vivo, for the three strains, bacterial counts were lower in peritoneal fluid with the combination compared with fosfomycin alone (P < 0.001) and inhibited growth of resistant mutants in all cases. Conclusions - The combination of fosfomycin and temocillin demonstrated a benefit in vitro and in vivo against E. coli strains producing KPC-3 or OXA-48-type carbapenemases. This combination prevented the emergence of fosfomycin resistance and proved to be more bactericidal than fosfomycin alone