181 research outputs found

    A lower global lung ultrasound score is associated with higher likelihood of successful extubation in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients

    Get PDF
    Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to assess loss of aeration, which is associated with outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting to the emergency department. We hypothesized that LUS scores are associated with outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving invasive ventilation. This retrospective international multicenter study evaluated patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with at least one LUS study within 5 days after invasive mechanical ventilation initiation. The global LUS score was calculated by summing the 12 regional scores (range 0-36). Pleural line abnormalities and subpleural consolidations were also scored. The outcomes were successful liberation from the ventilator and intensive care mortality within 28 days, analyzed with multistate, competing risk proportional hazard models. One hundred thirty-seven patients with COVID-19-related ARDS were included in our study. The global LUS score was associated with successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.96; P = 0.0007) independently of the ARDS severity, but not with 28 days mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.97-1.08; P = 0.36). Subpleural consolidation and pleural line abnormalities did not add to the prognostic value of the global LUS score. Examinations within 24 hours of intubation showed no prognostic value. To conclude, a lower global LUS score 24 hours after invasive ventilation initiation is associated with increased probability of liberation from the mechanical ventilator COVID-19 ARDS patients, independently of the ARDS severity.Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic pulmonary disease

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Ne vous faites pas de bile, ça se soigne

    No full text
    SCOPUS: no.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Intoxications par disulfiram et éthanol

    No full text
    SCOPUS: le.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Torsades de pointes due to methadone.

    No full text
    CommentLetterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Quel bilan chez le patient cardiaque avant un acte chirurgical non cardiologique?

    No full text
    In general, preoperative assessment of cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery relies on thorough clinical evaluation and rest EKG associated if necessary with further examination. In the case of coronary failure, coronary artery disease is the pathology most frequently encountered and is worrying because of the severe complications it provokes. Modern care of such patients requires a thorough study of clinical risk factors as well as pre-test probability of post-operative complications. This will enable one to quantify the cardiac risk and to work out the best strategy for pre-operative examinations in a restricted budgetary context. If the cardiac risk is low, no special pre-operative planning is necessary. On the contrary, a higher cardiac risk (institution dependent) renders relevant invasive exams necessary, such as radionuclide angiography and stress echocardiography. Positive testing leads to coronary angiography. If the latter reveals severe coronary stenosis, bypass grafting or percutaneous angioplasty is required if its risk does not exceed the patient's present post-operative complication rate for the scheduled surgery. For the other cardiac pathologies, echocardiography is the leading exam to assess left ventricular failure or valvular pathologies. New York Heart Association and Duke University classifications help in the risk stratification of such patients.Comparative StudyEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Lymphocytic pleural effusion associated with valproic acid.

    No full text
    Letterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore